Hanna Kordalska-Rosiek – “a steadfast promoter” of ethics and professional standards among journalistsI have a clearly defined attitude towards those who hold on to tv journalists, especially those connected with public television, controlled by subsequent ruling parties. In the absolute majority they are available propaganda, aware of who and how they are to serve. But she's not. Hanna Kordalska-Rosiek Common: TVP Gdańsk It is in this group a peculiar individual, worthy of the name of a unique media mend. It is publically presented and presented as a "journalist" for years fighting to keep advanced ethical standards of its profession. It is worse for her to carry out this mission alone.
The Good Name of PEDOFIL
H. I met Kordalska not as a writer but as a private resident of Gdańsk. erstwhile in the mediate of October 2015 I met a typical of TVP Gdańsk in the company of a cameraman, unsuccessfully trying to convince passersby to participate in any probe, I felt it was appropriate to aid a clearly disappointed woman. So I approached and the dialog between us began as follows:
– Do you consider yourself a tolerant man?
Yeah, but to any limits.
- Like what?
– I can't rise any tolerance for pedophiles.
– Oh, it's apparent and even legal.
– As a substance of fact, Roman Polanski, who is being prosecuted by law, is not adequate here, that it is tolerated yet in salons.
One could say – briefly, about and without addressing questions of any uncertainty about the facts themselves. I was kind of arrogant of myself. After all, I provided a public average writer with respective twelve seconds of valuable material, and in a situation where others so inclined to talk in front of the camera were not. In addition, I did not have a mouth that was more ugly than e.g. GeorgeWunderlich with SLD, and speech anything smoother than e.g. Adam Michnik from “Gazeta Wyborcza”, although they were not average passersby but real tv stars.
Unfortunately, for the next fewer days, I was someway incapable to find my episode on the ed program. Kordalska pt. ‘Daily transition’. Convinced that I had simply overlooked it, I asked the author by correspondence to indicate the date and place of issue. She reacted, I must say, quickly, due to the fact that on the same day. I learned that my message was 1 of those that “they fell out during assembly due to the fact that they did not fit”...
I am besides old a man and besides experienced a reporter to believe specified an argument. I was convinced that red. Kordalska joined the group of people who were not only tolerant of pedophiles but – even worse – who were vigilant about their good name. It is adequate that they are artists specified as Polanski.
However, I do not share specified tolerance, as I clearly expressed in the street probe. More, I had no more civic but journalistic ambition to bring things to an end. Especially erstwhile I found out that my intolerance to pedophiles had lost to the aired statements of intolerance to... squalled pavements and another specified "scandals". So I published this incidental on my website, and I clearly enraged Kordalska. She demanded that this publication be immediately removed under the rigor of bringing the case to trial. I said I'm not going to delete anything.
WHEN VEGETABLES OBTAIN
The subpoenas from the court did not come to me but the humiliation in the eyes of readers proved to be highly severe for the tv star. So severe that a small over a year later, she made the most of the chance she had to respond for an image failure. She was eagerly active in the PiS campaign, which, utilizing a subordinate TVP Gdańsk and a twelve another available media have decided to compromise me completely and to get free of besides independent, as a writer with his own publishing house.
An entry in papers was utilized as a pretext Security services About me. He was short and unambiguous in his words: “Non-cooperationIt’s okay. ” Not to refuse further cooperation or to proceed cooperation but to refuse without any papers proving otherwise – reports, reports, receipts, etc. In the words of everything that could not be removed even from the TW act “Bolka” or Lech Walesa during his sovereign presidency. For PiS polytruds, however, it did not matter. If there's an entry, it must have been a collaboration. And that's the version they kept to their first losing trials.
For me, the defence of the good name of a writer who was never tempted by the safe “unrejectible proposals” was a priority. Methodically and, but for 1 case, without any aid from lawyers, I was getting further slanderers. Of course, the biggest success was the winning trial with the manager of TVP Gdańsk Joanna Strzemiejna-Rozen and its free tools in individual Agaty Mielczarek. For here was the top scope and hence the slogan of the elimination of Jezierski went. The apology issued during the main release of the Panorama proved to be an highly painful kick for both perpetrators. Especially since the effort to immediately remove the board from archival resources failed without the ability to registry it, as can be seen below.
H. Kordalska-Rosiek had an highly easy chance to check the integrity of the accusations spread by the PiS-ers towards me. He lives little than 2 kilometres from the office of the Gdańsk branch of IPN. You can walk, by car, or even by tram. After a fewer minutes of travel, it's here. She could exercise her journalistic right of access to the files. However, she chose a more appropriate variant to her vindictive expectations and joined the chorus of slanderers extending her speeches to the central media, in the form of an online version of the monthly magazine "PressIt’s okay. ”
Unfortunately, the same thing happened to her as the boss and friend of TVP Gdańsk. It did not aid the support of a brazen, resorting to various swindling attorneys and appeal to the court of higher instance. judgement District Court of Gdańsk-North II Criminal Division, held in force by the judgement of the Gdańsk territory Court was unequivocal: wine. And as part of the criminal consequences, among others, the relation of PLN 3,000 to my benefit and the work to print on the main page www.MOTO.media.pl the content of the judgement for a period of not 1 as I suggested but two months.
STRENGTHENING THE LONGER, IF THE TROPIC OF ANTISEMITS IN THE HISTORY
Unfortunately, I waited almost half a year for the execution of the judgment, or the transportation of the order for its publication. The accused and punished, however, did not waste that time. She sought “justice” in her own way by sending out a calumny concerning the author of the publication wherever she could anticipate a affirmative response. As a crowning argument, I was assigned utmost anti-Semitism.
That's an interesting accusation. At least twice a day I say a long prayer to St. JosephOh, yeah. Semites of David's top family. In addition, I have consistently branded Israel's judaic wilderness in these pages, killing tens of thousands of Palestinian women and children of a clearly Semitic lineage. In the meantime, anti-Semitism attributes to me a media mend that I have never – what I have checked – protested against the slaughter of Semites in Gaza, qualified even by UN as a definite genocide. A somewhat smaller genre weight of the actual anti-Semitic Kordalska-Rosiek has to accuse me of homophobia, especially in the context of the defence of the good name of the celebrated pedophile from the movie industry, but it should be remembered that specified terms as anti-Semitism, homophobia or xenophobia inactive work on the imagination and decisions of many imbeciles, representing authorities in the 3rd Republic of Poland.
The above cannons brought about by Kordalska-Rosiek did not have the expected effect. A writer sent by her friend portal “Press”, after reading my arguments, he usually left the publication in the version expected by her inspiration. The profession was besides made by a slanderer writing from the Criminal Law Group in Offices of the Ombudsman o ‘no uncovering of grounds for bringing an appeal or an emergency action in favour of Mr Kordalska-Rosiek from the final judgement of the Gdańsk territory Court.“
Yes, even her kindly Mirosław Golon, known for his pro-Ukrainian or alternatively pro-Banderian sympathies then manager Branch of the Gdańsk Institute of National Memory with a clear untrue sadness, he reported “MadamHanna Kordalska-Rosiek’that the decision of the president of the IPN of 11 May 2019 stating that I was not an worker or co-worker of the safety bodies of the PRL in any form and giving me the right to apply for the position of democratic opposition activist or individual being repressed for political reasons is valid.
By the way: M. Golona remembers from the press conference held on 13 December 2017. Journalists were then informed about the change of patrons of respective Gdańsk streets, made on the initiative of the Gdańsk branch of IPN as part of the “decommunisation” of the 3rd Polish Republic. Her victim was, among others, eng. Stanisław Sołdek – Outstanding shipbuilder and competent ship manufacture manager, including chief manager Vistula Shipyards in Gdansk. due to the fact that – like more than 3 million citizens of the Polish People's Republic – he had a “communist” affiliation in his biography PZPR (where her to Freedom Union) was replaced by a certain Kazimierz Szolochem – I even had no education at the level of the vocational school, although specified during the period of the Polish People's Republic it was not adequate that it was free of charge that inactive guaranteed students decent scholarships and full employment guarantees. The unquestionable merit of Szoloch, however, was the activity in "Solidarity", which – as he correctly described it Bronisław Geremek aka Levartov – was created toJews like him lived better in Poland than Poles, which was realised with a Stachanów surplus.
I politely asked Prof. Dr. hab. M. Golon if, in connection with the posthumous punishment of a prominent shipship, he besides anticipated removal from the plates on 1 of the Gdańsk individual roundabouts Jack Kuroniawho in his communism and at the worst russian prayer went much further. I heard the answer: “We Historics know better who was a Communist”. As the folk proverb says: "Go fuck yourself, it'll crap you"...
TOMASZ KOPOCZYŃSKI: "PAPUGA" WITH TURBOLDING
The court and the institutions of the Tele-moralist yet executes the court order to print the judgment, after its placement pays the first of the invoices to abruptly and decisively waive payment for subsequent invoices. Apparently, the pains of losing proved stronger than compliance with applicable law and common sense, or reason lost to the belief that with specified a proxy as Tomasz Kopopyński (pictured below) The head of 1 of the Gdynia law firms can arrange anything.
I have a clear criticism of the "papug" which is utilized by clients who are victims of apparent defence for large money, served by a crucial proportion of lawyers and lawyers. Performing these professions allows not only for impunity-free and well-paid scamming "in the name of a good customer" but besides frequently stimulates active participation in groups carrying out the heaviest crimes, mysterious deaths without excluding (video: mafia of the alleged townhouse cleaners in Warsaw).
In the above context, the swindlings utilized by T. Kopoczyński appearing on behalf of Tele-moralist H. Kordalska Rosiek seem innocent. In fact, they should not give the position of an individual dressed in toga either to ignore apparent facts or to evidence insolently from the applicable law.
Head of the law firm with a credo banner in russian infinitive manners (“To realize the law, to realize a man) took off in his role, as if with turbocharge. Referring to my answer to the suit demanding the refund of money to H. Kordalska-Rosiek for the first invoice, he made the following statement: ‘I deny all claimsand the defendant’s applications, which I will not expressly grant’.
In my first instinct, I felt that I was dealing with a peculiar moron, in addition to being ostentatically insolent. It is hard to measure differently the usurpation of the right to decide which of the claims and conclusions the another organization may admit or deny, even if they were covered in undeniable facts. I was convinced that each of the judges active in the trial would bring the author of the fresh law, worthy of a regulation ‘Lex Koposzynski’ On the ground with a bang.
Unfortunately, I did not take into account T. Koposzynski's causative power. He seemed to know well what to anticipate and why from those sitting behind the bench. His method was primitive but effective: to reject any experts who do not meet his expectations and request – let us add, request effective – the appointment of experts by the court, which he will indicate himself. My task was to show that the favorites of the slanderer's typical from TVP Gdańsk do not have the basic competence to express opinions on the subject of the dispute, namely whether the costs of 2 months of publication of the judgement on the main page of the portal were the same or akin to those of another portals of comparable popularity.
And they weren't, but that was an argument that definitely proved mine benefit. I joined the case file due to the fact that I joined the price list for the publication of the alleged text commissioned on the main page of the portal ‘Business Puls’ about ratings even somewhat lower than the portal "MOTO.media.pl". A publication of this nature and at the same place was valued at PLN 24.000 net for the week of issue, which meant that monthly emissions would cost PLN 130.731 gross, i.e. 17 times (!) more than specified by my, inactive unregulated invoices.
T. Koposzynski did not even convince this fact. On the contrary. Consistently, he stuck to the “papuzi” gibberish presented in the numbering 10 pages (!) of the lawsuit, from which he could specifically only compression out his request not only to reject my right to pay outstanding invoices, but even to reimburse the invoice already paid. In another words, it is not a slanderer, but how I should be punished with about 10 1000 zlotys, which consist of PIT and VAT taxes on 3 invoices issued, plus a refund of almost the full amount which the accused was willing to pay for the first invoice. Question is, what's the punishment for? Yeah, for the fact that I dared to reprove my individual possessions and didn't let any media man credit me with acts I never did.
Two candidates of the experts proposed by the author "Lex Koposzyński" rejected by the court on the basis of my appeals allowed to hope that the case would turn out in a good, consistent, undeniable argument, direction. In a akin vein, I received the appointment of an expert not another individual designated by the Kordalska-Rosiek proxy but by the SSR Dorothy Krygier. Her choice was up to Zbigniew Zareka, a judicial expert at Gdansk territory Court, a judicial expert at District Court in Warsaw and a taxation expert at Chamber of taxation Administration in Gdansk.
Although the expert did not consider the 17 times lower price of publication of the judgement on the website "MOTO.media.pl" than on a portal with akin ratings, 1 of the key sentences contained in the opinion was: ‘The marketplace rate utilized as a measurement in the settlement of any marketplace transaction may be marketable only if the marketplace is the transaction itself.’ For apparent reasons, the publication of a judgement cannot be qualified as a marketplace transaction.
JUDGMENTS FOR THE measurement OF THE FULL MOTOR
How easy it is to know, specified an opinion clearly fell short of the expectations of T. Koposzynski, who accused her "no peculiar messages’. He made another letter in which he requested the admission of evidence from the opinion of another forensic expert pointing to experts from the territory Court in Warsaw and as if forgetting that precisely the same position is the expert Zbigniew Zawolak. In addition, the typical of H. Kordalska-Rosiek requested a simplification in the remuneration of the expert.
And this is where the unusual shuffle begins in the judge's lineup and the accompanying senility towards T. Kopopyński. First SSR Marek Jankowski accompanied by an SSR Katarzyna Walewska decides drastically due to the fact that close four times reduce the expert's wage of Z. Competition, specifically – from 3.660,48 to 944,64 PLN.
Then the SSR Dorota Krygier returns to the game, which allows the opinion Piotr Sulewski, a Warsaw court expert in the scope, as recommended by T. Kopopyński, of “online marketing” in relation to the assessment of the marketplace rate applicable during the contract between the plaintiff and the defendant. At the end of March last year, the aforementioned justice decides to let the opinion of Mr Sulewski to take the procedural documentation, and on 4 June of the same year grants him a wage in accordance with his expectations. PLN 5.425.32, higher by nearly 2 1000 zlotys than the wage of the expert Z. Z. Z. The competition, and even before 4 times the simplification of this salary. As you can see in Warsaw not only dogs bark more centralBecause the expert deserves special, Central rates. And 1 more thing: in the guide letter to the above-mentioned provision I was described as... Henry Jezierska. This is what feveriness and haste can do as shortly as possible to “refuse” the case as an influential proxy of the another party.
The key problem, however, is that I have not been given the chance to address this opinion within a time limit allowing for its rejection and the removal of the amount of P. Sulewski's wage from the symbolic gold. I could only do it – attention! – 25 July last year, which is nearly 2 months after accepting the wage for the Warsaw expert.
Meanwhile, he proved to be an highly impudent fraud. Premeditated, despite the company documentation available in the file Google, understated the average monthly number of visits to the site www.MOTO.media.pl of 42.882 to – it is not known from where it was downloaded – “numbers approx. 11,000. visits’, almost four times lower. This, indeed thieving, scam allowed Mr. Sulewski besides four times undervalue the publication of the judgment.
As if it was not enough, wrongly recommended by T. Konopoczyński “Internet marketing specialist’ (Such a speciality Mr Sulewski did not even mention in his self-presentation) did not consider the dependence of the valuation of the publication on its nature and place of issue. However, the final judgement of the court expressly ordered the publication of a copy of the judgement on the organization Main MOTO.media.pl portal, which meant, among another things, the regular care by the editor or graphic designer to guarantee that the written copy was appropriately exposed and included in the first 3 leading texts. The cost of this kind of service amounts to an additional minimum of 50 to 200 percent of the basic rate. Even if the cheapest option was accepted, the publication of the judgement should cost PLN 17,550 net, which is much more than the value of all invoices issued by me.
The 3rd "objection" of the expert concerns the comparison of the price of publication of the judgement on MOTO.media.pl with another portals. Mr Sulewski describes them as ‘renomated’ without even giving them their coverage, after which he states that the publication of the judgement would be much cheaper for them. On the basis of specified unconfirmed evidence, any, even the most absurd, thesis can be drawn.
And then what about the case? It went on “like a petal”. For nothing, my position of 30 October 2025 against a tele-moralist from TVP Gdańsk, demanding payment for the fact that I dared to fulfill the final judgement of the court, confirming the unwarrantedness of her slanders towards me. The circumstantial arguments and evidence of manipulation by her lawyer recognising only what he would like did not help.
On 21 April this year, SSR D. Krygier issued a resolution, Note – not subject to justification and without the anticipation of appeal – about omitting my application for approval of evidence from a judicial expert representing a higher intellectual and ethical level than that demonstrated by Mr. Sulewski from Warsaw.
So I have nothing left to do but wait for T. Kopopyński's further action to effectively convince the judges that it is not his client but I should be fined for denying compliance by tele-moralist H. Kordalska-Rosiek with ethical principles and professional standards. The only advantage for me is the anticipation of making public the impetuousness and insolence of its author, but effective principle. ‘Lex Koposzynski’. It sounds, as I recall, as follows:
‘I deny all claimsand the defendant’s applications, which I will not expressly grant’.
With respect to SSR Dorota Krygier, I will take advantage of the rule “Lex Biernacka’, precisely described in the publication under the eloquent title “LEX BIERNACK, HOW UNCLAIMABLE IT IS TO BE DISCUSSIONED”. Her adaptation to this material could look like this:
‘Although it cannot be demonstrated that justice Dorota Krygier is simply a individual suffering from secondary illiteracy or/and tasked by an unknown principal, she herself has not proved otherwise."
Henryk Jezierski
Photos: Public domain
(15.09.2026)
