Ukraine has received and continues to receive a comparatively large financial aid package since the start of the Russian intervention, both from the European Union (EUR 4 billion) and the United States (US$ 18.6 billion). We can read specified data in authoritative reports. However, even in mainstream media, we can hear that these amounts are much higher – according to words journalists Candace Owens for Fox News, the US donated much more funds to Ukraine. Unfortunately, at the same time, there is increasing concern, both behind the Atlantic and in the European Union, that the funds transferred are not being utilized in the way they should.
For own pockets
The aforementioned writer reports that $50 million already donated to the U.S. was spent on properties in Switzerland by Volodymyr Zelensky and his loved ones and friends. In a word, funds to support the ruined (not only war) Ukrainian economy have been embezzled. The European Union has besides seen that 90% of the financial and material aid sent is virtually disappearing in unexplained circumstances and directions. Since the beginning of the war, we have been able to look at situations where food products and the first needs of the cities to scope the needy, appeared in Ukrainian stores for sale. Moreover, even if any tiny part of the aid was received through humanitarian, charitable aid, it was issued with language apartheid. This means that Russian-speaking people for purely political-propagand reasons did not have access to products and were openly discriminated against by those liable for issuing them.
Although military equipment donated by the US, among others, was surrendered to the Ukrainian army in leasing, therefore, it will gotta in explanation pay the subscription fee for the usage of the equipment entrusted, but in the light of the above mentioned trends, it can be assumed that any repayment de facto incurred debts (including various banks and global funds) will most likely be made in kind. This is due to the approach of the political elite of Ukraine, which is completely irrelevant neither to the destiny of its own citizens nor to any, for example, patriotic attachment to natural resources and the state of possession of all inactive functioning industries or simply businesses in their own country. In short, there will be repayment of debts in nature, the sale of Ukrainian goods for a fraction of their real value. This kind of action is typical of the Komrador elites, corrupted, separated from the society they manage. For specified groups of power, only their own good is important.
Penalties against Europe
Come on. Ursula von der Leyen She promised the government in Kiev that the monthly aid for Ukraine would amount to around EUR 4 billion, and the increasing scepticism of giving Ukrainian elites any aid is visible. As a result, even Ukrainian troops themselves without resources or even basic food will resold the Russian side of the guns entrusted to them, which creates a dangerous situation for the donors themselves. As a consequence of specified acts, Moscow has almost unlimited access to the technological thought of countries sending their weapons to Ukraine. So even technological espionage is not needed to guarantee that Russia is full aware of the military possible of the European Union and the US.
While spending considerable resources to aid the corrupt Zelensk Government, inflation is growing, both in the European Union and in the US. Uncontrolled overprinting of money in order to supply financial assistance to refugees in the form of any kind of support and inclusion in the various social policy programmes of host countries causes the local currency to lose value. The sanctions imposed on Russia have been hitting Russia for a long time, and they are now clearly in the very ones imposing them alternatively than in the state to which they were intended to harm. The only crisis facing Russia present is the increase in the discontent of Russian society from withdrawing troops from Kherson.
Abandoned population of Chersonia
According to authoritative statements by the Kremlin, this decision was due to the fact that, from a financial point of view, the Russian troops were not paid to keep their positions in Kherson. However, according to many observers, Moscow was afraid that there would be provocation from Kiev in the form of blowing up the dam of the water power station in Nowa Kachowce, which would consequence in flooding and thus the death of over 100,000 people and Russian soldiers themselves. Unfortunately, the Russians themselves believe that the withdrawal of troops, i.e. de facto The Russian administration from Chersonia will consequence in the death of people surviving there, who will be left to the Ukrainian army seeking revenge on alleged Russian collaborators. Meanwhile, the fact is that the local population decides to cooperate more or little successfully with the presently stationed troops to simply survive. Thus, regardless of whether they are Russian or Ukrainian troops, injured citizens effort to peacefully coexist with them. Nevertheless, as was the case in previously abandoned areas by the Russian army (and thus devoted alternatively than captured by the Ukrainian army, as it is mistakenly recorded in the media), the population of the Kherson region will be treated with force by the army and the Ukrainian administration. The citizens of Russia, knowing the situation, are rebelling against Putin's government due to this, for a humanitarian reason.
Lack of transparency
Turning to the financial issue, the American public sees a immense fraud of funds transferred Ukraine and does not want their taxes to be spent on luxury abroad estates for Ukrainian oligarchs and members of the Kiev government. Of course, any observers and researchers knew and predicted that the Ukrainian state, which, even before the outbreak of the conflict, did not meet any standards of a democratic state, where corruption was and is an endemic phenomenon, would not lend funds transparently. no of them had any illusions that money would dissolve, and aid would only improve the wealth of the wealthiest people in the country, and only a fraction of all aid would actually go to those affected by military action by both parties.
The outrage in the US and the European Union is increasing all the more due to the fact that Zelenski is already clearly and clearly allowing fraud of money transferred by allied countries and is constantly asking for more. It is so felt not only that the Ukrainian-Russian war is simply a substance of general fatigue and indifference, but besides that there is impatience and a sense of injustice corrupted by the behaviour of Ukrainian political elites. This is due to the fact that, no substance how negative we might have assessed the countries of the European Union and the US, most of the procedures, both at the individual and at the level of medium-sized officials, are comparatively transparent, especially if we compare with akin circumstances in Ukraine.
Non-refundable alms
The aforementioned writer Candace Owens, who has previously been a passionate supporter of providing broad support to Ukraine, present suggests that a peculiar committee should be established to analyse where Kiev spent American money. Similarly, many global organisations, including the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation, request that the Kiev Government be brought before the competent The Court, which would examine and measure whether the actions of the Zelenski Government bear any sign of crimes from the point of view of global law. Indeed, it can be surmised that the powers of the elite of power in Kiev will not let their subcontractors to be released and punished; this would be how they would justice a realistic approach to current events. However, it can be seen that ever-seeking aid and support, corrupted, preying on the misery of war for their citizens, Ukrainian elites can shortly stand against the wall. More and more centres are announcing the simplification and even the completion of any material tranches for Ukraine, seeing the senselessness of specified action. For example, Germany, which has late requested that the countries that had previously provided financial assistance to Kiev be excluded from adding to subsequent tranches for Ukraine (obviously stressing that Germany belongs to specified countries). specified information is peculiarly grotesque given that financial assistance is being provided by a vast majority of the EU countries, so in theory, any aid on its part would be impossible. We so have a clearly melting desire to further support Ukraine even by Europe.
Candace OwensFinally, we should ask ourselves a question about the sense of Poland's continued support for our east neighbour. What is the intent of the Vistula donors? Especially since, unlike Brussels and Washington, we are not lending to Ukraine, but we are virtually doing something like giving unrewarded charity, which we are to be highly arrogant of. Does this kind of impatience be among Poles who observe a drastic increase in inflation from 1 period to the next, which is said to be gaining momentum? Or do Poles pay little and little attention to developments in Ukraine and pay more attention to the conflict for survival? It is hard to find any logic (taking into account, of course, only possible solutions to this mystery officially considered) in the proceedings of Polish elites of power. possibly they accept the principles that guided cartoon King Julian – “Let’s do it before we realize it doesn’t make sense”?
Sylvia Gorlicka
