Where do moths always go – and how do they end up?

wiernipolsce1.wordpress.com 9 months ago

.

Is it in the Polish national interest to cultivate anti-putinian propaganda – ?

.

.

There is simply a dispute between me and my colleague Paul (the neon “stanislav”) about Russia's current policy, or “collective Putin” rule. The word "collective Putin" is, in my view, as valid as the word "deep state" in relation to the US and British policies. However, there are fundamental differences as to the essence of these terms, due to the fact that what we specify as "collective Putin" governments does not have full power in Russia, nor does it own Russian property in contrast to what constitutes a "deep state" which, so far, has full power (all over the West) and is powerfully owned by US assets. And if I mention to Russian politics from the point of view of Polish national interest (although most of us, unfortunately, cannot specify them) – due to the fact that this is the most crucial 1 for us - and my colleague identifies with 1 circumstantial one, it is not known how many supporters possessing, Russian (and in so far as it is Russian, we cannot be sure) anti-putinian option – anti-collective Putin.

In 1 of my comments to Paul, I took the liberty of writing:

to anti-putinian propaganda you fly like a moth to fire with no discernment of who you stand for”. Which only strengthened my colleague in his anti-putinian publicistrhetoric And he definitely said:

... However, I intend to proceed to look at the opinions of the Russians, whom I respect for the persuasion and impracticability of their reasoning and concrete actions. I besides intend to inform users about these opinions and views, including the Neon24 portal."https://wps.neon24.net/post/177889,streelkow-no-admits-se-to-wine-and-no-request-o-ulscan

My point of view on Russian policy is as follows. I'm not interested. current The form of Russian rule, it does not substance whether it is Tsar's government, communist or current capitalist "collective Putin". But it's crucial to me thatRussia is not our enemy, does not endanger any of our interests, There are no claims against Poland, but 1 suggestion, which he does not even repeat – he wants good neighbourly relations with Poland and nothing more.

Today, however, Russia is at war with the West ruled by a “deep state”, that is, by the Jewish-Anglossianau finance, through which Poland (like many another countries) has been colonized and is economically and culturally degenerate, and Polish society is taxable flockau working for a "deep state" – To our enemies, to whom we must pay debt interest, due to the fact that that is how the financial strategy is set up. And the alleged West is our irreconcilable enemy not since 1990, but it has always been, it was even erstwhile there was no "deep state" – it is adequate to remember from what direction the conquest of Slavics came from.

So, Russia’s “collective Putin” fighting the West in Ukraine is fighting our eternal and fatal The enemy. And so we get to the simple question, Is it in the Polish national interest to practice anti-putin propaganda – ?

Should specified propaganda be pursued by individual who introduces himself in his dossier as a nationalist and a realist – ?

WArto besides yet realizes that the anti-putinian propaganda of Russian environments – supported by Paul ("stanislav") - regardless of the reasons for this, perfectly fits into the same propaganda of Western common Jewish-media. Should this way be followed by a Polish nationalist, a realist – ?

Of course, it doesn't regulation out in no way making public studies and evaluations politics of any country.

Dariusz Kosiur

Read Entire Article