erstwhile I follow the mouths of 2 women from Poland 2050 (apparently they changed the name, but nothing else) I am enraged, due to the fact that after all, this theatre is expected to be politics in their terms, and it is simply a manifestation of nonsense for public money and for the benefit of “coalicians”, and in fact for saving stools, which are increasingly escaping from t.c. On the another hand, there is besides Schadenfreude (being at the services of Berlin, you gotta master any ideas.) due to the fact that stupidity can be branded and it doesn't hurt her. Not until she stands in the audience, possibly the audience will yet admit her.
Understandably, specified parties and specified politicians are needed erstwhile it comes to demolition on a national scale. It's no of their business. PSL, Poland 2050, left and insignificant “coaliciers” have 1 task: to perceive to the leader. Stalin had the organization level followed by a area that didn't clap. All he had to do was pay for it, even with a camper. Hitler didn't gotta do specified a thing, due to the fact that those who were in the area were clapping themselves. There are words in the conflict song for the east Front: Freiheit das Ziel, Sieg das Panir! Führer, befiehl! Wir folgen dir! (The goal of freedom, the banner of victory. Order, Chief, and we'll follow you). Only 1 thing's real here: Führer, befiehl! Wir folgen dir! due to the fact that they followed Hitler blindly, even to slaughter in Russia. And so his “coaliciers” follow Tuski. It's so ugly to watch Kosiniak Kamisz, yet by education a doctor, unthinkingly nodding him. You don't even want to talk about others.
So who is this Tusk? After all, he is not known for political successes, not counting kissing Berlin and Brussels. He sings to them “vir folgen dir (euch) (we follow you) and he is sung by the same horners in Warsaw: we follow you. Who is he?
Richard Legutko in his fresh book: Recapitalisation, Warsaw 2025, describes Tusk as a sociopath due to the fact that he is human vindictive and to a degree different in any of the current and past politicians of the 3rd Republic. As vindictiveness transcends boundaries, it begins to control the full action of man. this suspicion of sociopathy becomes credible (p. 392). And then:
"I understood, yes: no man with work for the country – and I compose it in 2025. erstwhile Tusk is Prime Minister – he could not lie to Poles on an equally manic and comparable scale, he would not clearly lead a deliberate and transparent demolition of the economical and political institutions of Poland, he would not ruin the budget, he would not retreat from key investments, he would not demonstrably violate the law to an degree even unimaginable, he would not ignore Polish interests in order to service abroad interests, and, above all, he would not deepen to the limits of the pathological Polish-Polish war which threatens the disaster of the Polish state." (p. 394)
The author describes Tusk as a "sociopath". hatred and vindictiveness are characterized by the majority of self-employed who endure from this ailment. In the last moments of his life, Hitler had even specified friends as Göring and Himmler killed due to the fact that they wanted to go their own way.
I appreciate prof. Legutko's opinion, but I have my doubts, is what Tusk does simply due to his apparent sociopathy? (Socipata is simply a individual with antisocial personality disorder (ASPD), characterized by a deep deficiency of empathy, manipulation, disregard for social norms and deficiency of remorse). If that were the case, Tuska could be justified, as is the case with psychopaths. However, it so happens that the activities of Tusk and his government clearly indicate that the origin is consciously serving abroad interests. These include EU initiatives that harm Poland in the fields of economy, identity, ideology and sovereignty. There is an otherwise incomprehensible submission to Germany, bordering on any inferiority complex.
In view of this right view of Tusk, why does the government and the electorate perceive to him? The government, due to the fact that it chooses people, either limited or opportunists ready for all bastard to make a career, or psychopaths uncovering satisfaction in doing dirty work. And the electorate? There's no clear answer. You gotta go back to the analogy. Hitler had to the end, and possibly he inactive has supporters. So did Stalin. After Stalin's death, I saw people – Poles – crying. Why, then, is it amazing that Tusk has followers? You'd think of the end of both despots, but that would require any kind of intellectual predisposition. You should be sorry.
Recently, 1 of the German newspapers said that the possible successor of Tusk would be Sikorski. Tusk is perverse, which doesn't mean it's always stupid. So Sikorski is simply a change for the worse. Or is that what Germany needs?
