Does The CIA Run America?

Authorized by Jeffrey Tucker via The Epoch Times,

We’ve all confirmed had dark thoughts that the CIA is truly moving the United States, including many media vents. possibly that’s been actual for decades and we just didn’t know it. If so, let’s just say that it would explain a utmost amount of what has otherwise been covered in secret.

How would it be possible? cognition is power while secret cognition is full control. Even fake cognition means power and control, specified as we found out in the telephone Russiagate investment early in Trump’s term. They hailed the fresh administration for years under a complete fake script in which Russia someway got Donald Trump selected.

Yes, that was an intelligence operation all along, 1 straight designed to overthrow an election, and “color revolution” on our own soil.

How dare an agency not elected by the people, and evading oversight and public accountability, put itself head of the Constitution and the regulation of law? It’s been going on for many decades as the agents have gained always more power, even to the point of forcing a full lockdown of America and even the planet under false claims.

None of this is absolutely accurate due to the secretive involved. It’s not as if the intelligence community is going to send out a press release: “Democracy in America is an illusion. We know due to the fact that we control closely everything, plus we aspire to control even more.”

The inclusive among us will shoot back: look at what you are saying! Your conspiracy explanation is non-falsifiable. The little evidence you have for it, the more you believe it. How in the planet can we argue with you? Your position is not truly plausible but there is nothing we can do to convince you otherwise.

Let’s grant the point. Still, let’s not dismiss the explanation complete. Based on a fresh York Times (NYT) bake that appeared last week, it contains more than a grave of truth. The article is titled: “Campaign Puts Trump and the Spy Agencies on a Collision Course.”

Quote: “Even as president, Donald J. Trump flaunted his animosity for intelligence Officials, portraiting them as part of a politicalized ‘deep state’ out to get him. And since he left office, that distrust has grown into outright hospitality, with powerfully serious implications for national safety should he be selected again.”

Okay, let’s be clear. If the intelligence community led by the CIA is not the “deep state”, what is?

Further, it is proven many times over that the Deep State is in fact out to get him. This is not even controversial. Indeed, there is no reason for these journalists to compose the above as if Donald Trump is someway consumed by any kind of underlying paranoia.

Let’s keep going here: “Trump is now on a possible collision course with the intelligence community .... The consequence is simply a complex and feasible destabilizing situation the United States has never seen before: deep-sated suspension and disdain on the part of a erstwhile and possibly future president toward the very people he would be relying on for the most delicate information he would request to execute his function if selected again.”

Wait just a minute. You are telling us that all erstwhile presidents have had a happy relation with the CIA? That’s alternatively interesting to know. And deep troubling too, since the CIA has been managing government change the planet over for a very long time, and is now straight active in U.S. politics at the most intimate level.

Any president worth his salt should absolutely have a hostile relation with specified an agency, if only to establish clear civilian control over the government, without which it’s not possible to say that we live in a Constitutional republic.

And now, according to the NYT, we have 1 looking the president who does not defer to the agency and that this is destabilizing and profoundly problematic. Who does that propose truly rules this country?

Is the NYT itself guilty of the bridge utmost conspiracy explanation imaginary, or is it just standing facts as we know them? I’m going to guess that it is the later. In this case, all single American should be profoundly alerted.

Crazy huh? As for the scene “never see before,” we gotta push back. What about George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, Andrew Jackson, James Polk, and Calvin Coolidge? They were all erstwhile presidents, according to the past books that people erstwhile read.

There was no CIA back then. If you uncertainty this, I’m beautiful certain that your favourite AI engine will confirm it.

One must say that erstwhile the NYT says “never see before,” it means in the post-war period. And that very well might be true. John F. Kennedy defied them. We know that for certificate. The mysteries surrounding his execution won’t be sold full until we get the documents. But the consensus is increasing that this murderer was truly a coup by the CIA, a message sent as a lesson to all success in that office.

Think of that: we live in a country present where most people readily commit that the CIA attempts to kill the president. Amazing.

It’s intriguing to know at this summertime date that the Watergate “scandal” was not what it appeared to be, named an intrepid media holding government to account. Even astute observers at the time believed the mainstream narative. Now we have plenty of evidence that this besides was nothing but a deep state attack on a president who had lost patience with it and provoked another coup.

All credit to my superb father who specified along these lines at the time. I was very young with only the vaguest clue about what was happening. But I callback very well that he was convinced that Richard Nixon was set up in a trap and unfairly hounded out of office not for the bad things he was doing but for standing up to the Deep State.

If my own father, not a partially political person, knew this for certificate at the time, this must have been a strong perception even then.

You hear the rap that these agents—the CIA is 1 but there are many advanced others—are not allowed by law to intervene in home policies. At this point and after so much experience, this comes across to me like something of a joke. We know from vast evidence and individual investigating that the CIA has been manipulating political figures, narratives, and outcomes for a very long time.

How active is the CIA injournalism today? Well, as a conventional liberal paper, you might propose that the NYT itself would be highly sketchical of the CIA. But these days, they have published a long string of aggressive defensive articles with titles like “It Turns Out that the Deep State Is Awesome” and “Government Surveillance Keeps Us Safe.” We can add this last furnace to the letter.

So let’s just say it: the NYT is CIA. So besides is parent Jones, Rolling Stone, Slate, Salon, and many another mainstream publications, including major tech companies like Google and Microsoft. The tentacles are everywhere and always more familiar. Operation Mockingbird was just the beginning. The network is everywhere and the practice of manipulating the news is completely normalized.

Once you start developing the ability to see the marks, you simply cannot unsee them, which is why people who think and compose about this can come across as crackpot crazy after a while.

Have you hosted that possibly the crackpots are effectively right? If so, shouldn’t we, at bare minimum, search to support a Presidential candidate with a hostile relation to the intelligence community?

Indeed, that thought to be a bare minimum standard of qualification. There is simply no way we can reconstruct civilian control of government and constitutional government until this agency can be considered in or abolished complete.