In the heads of our "our" experts (so far of the "pro-American" being) someway cannot fit (and no longer fit) that the "loving freedom and democracy" of the United States are and were an imperialist state which systematically (although not always effective) conquers subsequent territories.
This conquest is either "peaceful" (e.g. by financing political upheavals or any "colour revolutions") or by military aggression, "humane bombing" and physical demolition of alleged or actual opponents. Although this second method has ended over the last fewer decades with a series of humiliating failures (Indochins, Iraq, Afghanistan), the first 1 is more effective and has permanently expanded the American protectorate, especially in east Europe. Now the US needs success on the "peaceful" road – we besides know the action plan: the annexation is to concern Canada (new 51 state), all or part of Greenland, part of Panama and part of Ukraine. This is most likely not a complete list, due to the fact that the present time is conducive to large political change.
Why? That's a full different communicative and I'll get back to it someday. The most crucial thing is that another large powers – Russia has become active in a akin imperialistic conflict: in the present situation, giving her a hand can so be "buyed" for American imperial plans. Nihil novi sub sole: for thousands of years this has been a abroad policy, which is governed by the "Earth Commandment" – something for something. The US supporting Russia in the victorious end of the war with the Kiev authorities (which will most likely be listed along the way) will get its approval in return for its much larger (and much more favorable) annexation. What is east Ukraine worth from the position of Washington, in addition to Russian, compared to the annexation of Canada or even parts of Greenland? At least 2 birds can be killed on the same fire here: after all, Russia has become the leader of the anti-American Global South and can be taken out of that strategy by the way. I have been writing about this for 2 years and this script is becoming more and more likely.
The greats of this planet hold their power position only erstwhile they defend their interests by preserving the rule of proportionality: each large player must gain (the cost of others) proportionally – the rule of indenisation. It's a mistake to miss individual crucial in sharing the spoils, due to the fact that then you won't accomplish pacification. If our global policy experts, and especially “geostrategists”, did not read mostly sovetological stupidities, possibly they could foretell specified a turn of events. Now it is only lamented that the US was "trading" Ukraine, which straight confirms the suspicion that they are "ministers of the Ukrainian people", even though they besides live with the money of Polish taxpayers. This "hide" was something simple to predict, due to the fact that the political and material support from the US for the authorities in Kiev from 2022-2024 was absurd from their perspective: after all, an crucial part of the equipment supplied is already in Russian hands.
With this support, however, Russia was pushed into the embrace of Beijing, which had already explicitly declared its hostility to America. Of course, it is possible to bribe the authorities in Beijing by giving them Taiwan (the Chinese besides live there), due to the fact that the American defence of this island objectively makes no sense – but the prestigious-powerful. But it would be another defeat of the American protectorate in Asia: we all remember the panic flight of American troops from Kabul and earlier from Seoul. A cheaper and more beneficial option for Washington will most likely be realized: a return to the tradition of nineteenth-century Russian-American relations in order to break the Chinese-Russian alliance in the large triad of powers (China, USA and Russia). He who is not a troubled rusophobe and knows something about American politics has considered this option from the beginning (not ours anymore) of the war.
Witold Modzelewski
Think Poland, No. 9-10 (2-9.03.2025)
