Who's scared? Political elites, their services and media, opinion-making, academic, artistic environments. All those who engaged in any degree in favour of the war in Ukraine.
They are not afraid of average, honest Kowalski – Polish taxpayers who have been robbed by the authorities in Warsaw, drowning billions of their money in our war. We Poles are not afraid of peace, we are afraid of war. And we anticipate the same from the elites who regulation us. Right now, erstwhile Russia is victorious at the front and the urgent request for peace is born, the elites should present us with Plan B. Polish policy plan for peace and fresh postwar reality. And of course they should present Polish bills for this war. Who? Not only Ukraine, but all those who forced us to finance this war, transform our territory into its military hub, caritas, and land promised to its banded ideologists and terrorists, .
The account, which is obvious, should not include God's spirit of guilty Ukrainians, authentic victims of war, wanting peace and conditions for a decent life. However, it turns out that Poland has no plan B. Her strategy is to proceed to participate in the war, to spend on arms and absurd debts in non-Polish banks. Moreover, no of the Polish decision-makers mention any Polish accounts, many of our war costs. Neither does anyone intend to settle Kiev or Warsaw. We are not even certain that in this one-way transmission of our assistance there was no corruption in the ranks of Polish politicians.
Peace Sabotage
Moreover, it turned out that right now, erstwhile a peaceful plan Donald Trump for Ukraine became the basis of the fresh phase of the negotiations on the end of the war, we lose these 5 minutes given to us to clear ourselves of bad fame – the fame of Herostrates – which we gained from Euromaidan, first inciting to the war of the West with Russia and then actively participating in it. utilizing the U.S. umbrella that president Trump has opened over all who will support his plan, the Polish authorities and the elite have forfeited the anticipation of political “conversion” and have engaged in sabotaging American peace efforts. Warsaw has sided with D. Trump's opponents – globalists who are in the transatlantic trance and its anti-Russian mechanics even now that the White home has announced a fresh US national safety strategy to the world, in which Russia ceases to be an enemy; it becomes a political and economical partner. Question number one: what did Poland gain from sabotaging peace? Or are profits drawn by single saboteurs?
Although the tragic 3 European globalists, leaders of this sabotage – Macron, Starmer and Merz – did not let Warsaw to join their ranks, the Polish authorities and Polish elites do everything to at least repeat them. Prime Minister Tusk and Minister Sikorski improvise any “talking” on the races, they go to any meaningless meetings to tell the planet that Poland inactive supports the war in Ukraine, inactive wants to be a military hub for it, declares another $100 million – this time to buy weapons in the US for Kiev – etc. By the way, all Polish decision-makers proceed to dig up Russia, due to the fact that so far it is only due to the fact that they held over us their power in this transatlantic matrix that they hatred it. All of this happens at the applause of the Polish parliament and mainstream media absorbed by mini-problems specified as the European tourism of the erstwhile Minister of Justice Ziobry’s Bitter Or dogs on the chain. In this tax-paid cluster – the random majority of people – there was no 1 who would request to settle anti-peaceful activities of the Polish authorities. Nobody worries them with any question, so they can calmly, with a copper head, tell Poles that during the peace negotiations on the part of Poland, the most crucial is the escalation of war and expanding our spending on it. How can we be certain that Polish decision makers of our participation in this not our war – those Kaczyński, Szydłów, Morawiecki, Tusków, Sikorski, Kosiniak Kamyszów – that no 1 in Poland will always settle them for this?
And we could have been, like, Viktor Orban and enter past as a protector of peace, standing on the bright side of power. At our request, we were on the other side – on the dark side of power.
Corruption
The revealed corruption in Kiev surely amazed not only EU but besides Polish elites. She surprised, but she didn't. Established under force from the US in 2014, the NABU office to combat it revealed a large-scale usage of management positions for private benefit in a strategical state sector company – Enerhoatom, whose yearly income is $5 billion. The investigation showed that $100 million was removed from the company. president Zelenski's friend, called his treasurer, was behind the proceedings, Timur Mindycz – who had escaped by taxi – of course – to Poland, and hence to Israel. On his recordings, the head of the Ukrainian President's office Andrij Jermak He's listed as Ali Baba. Their disclosure resulted in the resignation of the most crucial after Volodymyr Zelenski people in Ukraine, called vice president. president Trump's administration officials already know everything about Jermak's “robbers”. Hence the abrupt submission of Kiev to Washington and the expected readiness for peace talks.
It would seem that this corrupt context does not concern Poland. But how can you be so sure? Monitoring of events in Ukraine erstwhile Prime Minister Leszek Miller He warned the Polish authorities to deal with this matter. His words: “I do not want to take work as a Pole in any way – I do not feel co-responsible – for the subsequent scandals that erupt in Kiev” sound like a memento to all those who want to proceed to keep the war in Ukraine and sabotage peace. In view of the financial crimes that NABU has revealed, the people in the immediate vicinity of president Zelenski's continued financial and military support of Ukraine means supporting the corrupt regime. Sooner or later, you'll gotta take responsibility.
Fear
Prior to Jermak's resignation, the search in his office “took a cross” for further U.S. assistance to Volodymyr Zelenski and forced him – as well as supporting his European Union action – to consider Donald Trump's peaceful plan. Initially, EU political elites including Polish and related mainstream media ignored the problem and even attempted to silence it. However, erstwhile it turned out that the White home administration had conclusive evidence of corruption, and what is more, they are only the proverbial tip of the iceberg – the saboteurs of peace lost their faces. abruptly they saw the possible of ending the war without their participation. Therefore, E-3, the self-proclaimed European leaders – Macron, Starmer and Merz – began in awe to take quasi-peace action, compose their plan and at the same time proceed to support the military and financially losing Ukraine.
Poland was not invited to this “leader” group for many reasons. The most frequently mentioned is the deficiency of Warsaw's accession to the "voluntary coalition", reporting the readiness to send a military peace contingent to Ukraine. However, the Polish decision-makers who have been banned from both Washington and Brussels are not able to protest loudly and say that since the beginning of the war in Ukraine, Poland has, unfortunately, been doing much more for it and is inactive doing much more than the mentioned 3 "leader" states. And it was adequate to endanger the elimination of the notorious military hub in Poland for the Western war against Russia, so that transatlantic globalists would treat us differently. However, among the politicians of the governing strategy of Poland from the circular table there is no 1 who would spell it out clearly on the global stage. All the more reason we will not find among them anyone who would request equally loudly the condemnation of the flag genocide and the ban on its ideology in Ukraine and the European Union in both Donald Trump's plan and the EU counterplan. specified behaviour according to the Polish state ration would require Polish politicians to return straight not only to president Trump and the European three, but besides to president Vladimir Putin.
However, no 1 from the pacifying treaty of the Polish people has been able to make specified political returns since 1989. besides president Nawrocki, who has been trying late – unsuccessfully – to address the problem of penalising flagism. He would gotta go through a profound transformation of patriotic consciousness with his written-ipeenian facilities and cut himself off from Poland's harmful primitive rusophobia.
On the basis of not only political realism, but besides of specified a civilizational axiological transformation, 1 should not anticipate present Polish decision-makers, and if they were to "appear to them", it should not be taken seriously. Possible spectacular – in the face of an American-Russian strategical agreement announced by the US – the rejection of russophobia can only be achieved out of fear of losing power. Those who have created and created at this crisis minute for us since 1989 Polish abroad policy only gave and proceed to bear witness to the fact that "they hatred Russia much more than they love Poland". We have the right to anticipate from those who are just fighting for power in the upcoming parliamentary elections.
Incompetence
Poland's absence in peace negotiations is the biggest defeat of Polish abroad policy since Yalta. A memorable gathering of the “great three” – Joseph Stalin, Winston Churchill and Franklin Roosevelt – from February 4, 1945, in this Crimean hotel decided not only about the destiny of planet War II, but besides about the destiny of Europe and the planet in postwar strategical order. Bleeding, exhausted and defenseless Poland was not represented by any of the 3 mentioned. On the contrary, each 1 at the expense of Poland secured the interests of its state in the provisions of the Yalta. Will it be different now? Who of the negotiators will talk on behalf of Poland about the costs we incurred through military, financial, humanitarian, civilization-cultural participation in the Western War against Russia in Ukraine?
In the U.S.-Russia system, Donald Trump could call us. But nobody asked him to. Moreover, during his first abroad visit to the United States, president Nawrocki observed the American leader – planning a reset in relations with the Kremlin – not only before Putin, but besides Russia itself. So presented Polish rusophobia in the face of a changing planet arrangement could only cool the pro-Polish emotions of the American President. In turn, in the European, pro-Ukrainian – i.e. separated from the reality of war – the negotiating arrangement – Macron, Starmer, Merz – Poland is treated as a messenger boy.
All governments and all presidents of the III Republic of Poland are liable for the current defeat of Polish abroad policy. However, Prime Minister Tusk bears spectacular work for the current anti-peace policy and the head of the MFA on his behalf internationally Radosław Sikorski, which, in a media feud with the presidential palace, almost exclusively claimed the right to formulate a Polish position on the global stage. Despite functioning in Polish politics since 1992 – erstwhile he accepted it to his government Jan Olszewski in the rank of Deputy Minister of abroad Affairs – did not show in the critical minute for Poland present either political experience, skills or knowledge.
Instead of bringing Poland to the table of peace talks by diplomatic methods, it has political unrest. The most shameful evidence of this scandal is the praise of the decision of the Polish court not to give Ukrainian terrorists to Germany Cranberry Volodymira, liable for the diversion on the Nord Stream pipeline – received in the West as a praise for terrorism by Poland. The opinion of the state in favour of terrorism was again obtained after R. Sikorski said in October, encouraging Ukrainians to blow up the pipeline. A relationship that happened shortly after. The “warring” of the head of the MFA besides includes his media pushes with Elon Musk, which late ended in the bitter defender of the American businessman: “If, God forbid, there will be a request to supply Poland with 40,000 Starlink systems, this Sikorski pest will be liable for Poland’s problems.”
A separate chapter in the political unrest of this minister is his repeated calls to transfer frozen Russian assets to support Ukraine, which threatens Poland with the possible of being accused of stealing them from Russia. erstwhile we add to this deficiency of basic cognition about totalitarianism, we will get a full image of the incompetence of the current minister of the Polish Ministry of abroad Affairs. This deficiency was demonstrated by R. Sikorski at the last OSCE meeting, accusing Russia not only of deficiency of democracy, but besides of striving for totalitarianism. The Polish minister does not know that the foundation of totalitarianism is not this deficiency of democracy, but an all-powerful in life both social and individual ideology implementing the utopian social and anthropological plan, which was the formation of the "new man", alleged homo sovieticus. From this point of view, the European Union is closer to totalitarianism, proclaiming the concept of man without properties on the grounds of genderism and utmost ecology.
In addition, totalitarianism is atheistic and anti-Christian, which cannot be accused of Russia, which is experiencing a triumphant revival of Christianity. The problem of totalitarianism caused by R. Sikorski forces a digression connected with his biography. At the time erstwhile Polish peers of the current minister established student organizations independent of communist power, and Polish workers Solidarność; erstwhile we experienced over the Vistula the papal pilgrimages and revival of the Polish nation, pacified first in the state of war and then after a circular table by Balcerowicz reforms, Mr.Sikorski enjoyed a peaceful life in the West, to which – as Wikipedia writes – he entered (unless somehow) an English language course. And he returned to Poland – speaking colloquially – "ready to go", without taking a single flyer into his hand, without fleeing internment, the homeless, and later from unemployment to the West. With a biography like this, it's best not to contact the problems of totalitarianism.
The Polish minister of abroad affairs would besides request reliable cognition about Poles in Russia, including the descendants of our insurgents surviving in Siberia. Its absence can be demonstrated by the liquidation of the Polish consulate in Irkutsk – the last in Russia – as a retortion for the early closure of the last Russian consulate in Poland in Gdańsk. In this policy Polish interests and Polish sentiments related to Siberia were defeated by russophobia. The spirits of Siberian exiles and heroes cry over this failure now Anhellego – Siberian poem Juliusz Słowacki.
And everything happens erstwhile the fresh U.S. defence strategy eliminates American-Russian Russophobia. Its continuation is simply a madness, and at the same time an inept effort to imitate a policy consistent with Polish interests.
Prof. Anna Raźny
photo of wikipedia
Think Poland, No. 51-52 (21-28.12.2025)
