In the course of the investigation of the Industrial Censory Complex, a number of classified information on the large operation of lying to the public about the causes, the effects of coronavirus infection SARS-CoV-2 and the danger of receiving alleged mRNA vaccines were made public. This is simply a uncommon case, due to the fact that 5 years after the WHO announced a "pandemic" only a fewer countries have taken any action to analyse irregularities related to the widely implemented anti-covid policy.
During the "COVID-19 pandemic", as many as 83 governments – under the pretext of ensuring national safety or public wellness – banned peaceful gatherings and introduced media censorship.
Many scientists and journalists were harassed and intimidated. Between 2020 and 2021, 17 governments adopted government prohibiting the provision of "false information" on COVID-19. Singapore has a fine of up to 50,000 SGD for the dissemination of "false information" (more than PLN 140 thousand). Cash penalties were introduced in Russia, Tanzania, Egypt and the Philippines. In the case of the second country, people accused of spreading “false messages” on COVID-19 were facing imprisonment for up to 2 months.
Murthy v Missouri
On October 20, 2023, the U.S. ultimate Court agreed to analyse a very crucial Murthy case against Missouri (originally filed as Missouri against Biden). It concerns the function played by Biden's administration officials to influence large Tech companies, demanding them to remove and censor selected content.
The suit was brought in May 2022 by prosecutors general of the states of Missouri and Louisiana along with respective private individuals (epidemiologists, consumer and human rights defenders, scientists and media publisher). They claimed that various entities, including many national agencies and officials, were active in censorship, aimed primarily at conservative messages. It included topics specified as the 2020 presidential election, the origin of COVID-19, the effectiveness of wearing masks, the intake of vaccines and the honesty of correspondence elections. They accused national government officials of violating the first amendment by "pulling" or "significantly encouraging" social media companies to remove certain content or lower the ranking of content on their platforms, making it harder to find it.
In the case of the State of Missouri v. Biden, No. 23-30445 (5th Cir. 2023), in which the reasons are, among others, 3 doctors, it was claimed that the online platforms "drawn by strings" by the government suppressed their messages due to the fact that they did not agree with the authoritative communicative of power.
In their reply, officials argued that ‘they sought only to mitigate the hazard of online misinformation’ by ‘noting the content’ that violates the ‘platform policy’, which is simply a form of permitted government interference.
The territory court agreed with the plaintiffs and granted a preliminary broad safety in the case. The court assessed the proceedings of respective national offices and issued an order to cease contacts with social media platforms that afraid the White House, the Chief Doctor, the CDC, the FBI, the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Agency (CISA) and the State Department.
The Court of Appeal partially upheld and partially waived the safety and modified the ban for officials. In the opinion of the court, White home officials in cooperation with the Office of the Chief Doctor forced and importantly encouraged platforms to average content. So they interfered with the right to freedom of speech, which they cannot do.
According to court materials, White home officials, the CDC, the FBI and respective another agencies at least since 2020 have insisted that platforms remove "unfriendly content and accounts". They have accessed an accelerated reporting system, reduced content ranking or deleted marked posts and user pages. The moderation afraid content related to the explanation of virus leakage from the laboratory (COVID-19), lockdowns, side effects of vaccines, election scams and messages regarding the compromising content of the laptop of the president's son, huntsman Biden.
Census included Jayanta Bhattacharyya and Martin Kulddorff, 2 epidemiologists who co-authored the Declaration of large Barrington, an article criticizing lockdown; Jill Hines, an activist who initiated the action "Open Louisiana again"; Aaron Kheriaty, a psychiatrist who opposed the blockades and vaccination orders; Jim Hoft, owner of the Gateway Pundit website, erstwhile removed from the network. The rights of Missouri and Louisiana citizens have besides been violated, who have been prevented from proceeding certain information and opinions.
The court assessed the management proceedings of virtually all agencies from HHS, CDC, FDA, FBI, NIAID, CISA, through the State Department, Trade, Treasury, and even the Census Bureau on the Electoral Aid Commission ending.
Facebook, Twitter (now “X”), YouTube and Google were sued. The collected material shows that White home officials have ordered, for example, "immediate deletion of the account" or a limitation of the location of circumstantial content in the network. Posts and tweets were requested to be yet removed, posts and films removed, but besides to be updated frequently. Detailed information was requested on the principles of Facebook's moderation, explanations on what was done to limit the "questionable" or "sensational" content and what "interventions" were taken. Information was requested on the "measurable impact" of the moderation policy on platforms; it was wanted to know "how many posts [were] demoted" and why positioning was not changed in the event of spreading "missions of information".
Facebook besides zealously removed content that did not violate his own rules of moderation. The selected films — ‘marked’ by officials — were ‘degraded’. Platforms helped to strengthen government propaganda on given topics (Algorithmic reinforcement). Officials were dissatisfied anyway, and "frustration was to scope its highest in July 2021" erstwhile White home spokesperson and Chief Doctor, Dr. Fauci, and president Biden demanded decisive action to reduce "disinformation" on COVID-19.
CDC officials pointed out to platforms what is “mission” and what it takes to get free of it. FBI agents remained in constant contact with platforms, providing them with strategical data in advance, informing them of "disinformation trends in the run-up to national elections".
According to the court's findings, officials, both through private and public channels, requested platforms to delete content and utilized threats. They forced censorship of accounts held by another state officials for alleged “medical misinformation”. For example, a video by the Louisiana Department of Justice was removed, which presented state citizens testifying to legislature and questioning the effectiveness of vaccines and wearing masks during the "pandemic".
Medicalians Kulddorff or Kheriats complained that due to censorship of their posts on social media they were forced to self-censor and not inform the public, for example, of the effects of vaccines against COVID-19, although they had expertise in this subject, due to education and experience.
The Court of Appeal noted that "rarely it was faced with specified a coordinated campaign, on specified a massive scale, organised by national officials that threatened the fundamental aspect of American life." He added that the territory Court had the right view of the correct assessment of “continuous pressures” by any officials to censor content. The court agreed to the assessment of the lower court that officials were aiming to suppress millions of posts protected by the first amendment to the Constitution and by their actions caused irreparable damage. The Court of Appeal recalled that the deprivation of rights resulting from the first amendment, even for a short period of time, is adequate to establish irreparable damage. He besides added that while officials are curious in cooperating with social media in order to prevent misinformation and interference in elections, "the government must not support these interests to the degree that it engages in suppressing the point of view" due to the fact that "the order to defend the freedoms resulting from the first amendment is always in the public interest".
This is how a global censorship strategy is created. KNOW THE fact – THE NEWEST BOOK OF STELMS ALREADY AVAILABLE
Investigations of the Judiciary Committee
In addition to the pending lawsuits, in the United States, the home of Representatives commissions have initiated an investigation into "The Censorship Industrial Complex". U.S. Government Support For home Censorship And Disinformation Campaigns 2016 – 2022".
On 9 March 2023, writer Michael Shellenberger, testifying before the Judicial Subcommittee, spoke of a modern-day large censor company managed by the American technological and technological elite and financed by unconscious taxpayers. The complex threatens freedom and democracy. It includes a increasing network of government agencies, academic institutions and non-governmental organisations that actively act to censor American citizens — frequently without their cognition — on many issues including COVID-19 origin, COVID-19 vaccines, huntsman Biden business transactions, climate change, renewable energy, fossil fuels and many others.
The accusations were made at the Stanford University net Observatory (Stanford net Observatory), Washington University (Washington University), Atlantic Council (Atlantic Council’s Digital Forensic investigation Lab) and Graphika (the company analyses social media), which have unclear links with the Department of Defense, the CIA and another intelligence agencies. They besides work with many U.S. government agencies to institutionalize censorship investigation and advance them at another universities and in think tanks.
The Censoric institutions are to carry out operations to spread their own influences frequently under the cover of “verification of facts”, convincing journalists and social media management that accurate information is simply a disinformation that legitimate hypotheses are “conspiracy theories” and that greater self-censorship results in more reliable reporting.
According to Schellenberger, "in many cases censorship, specified as labelling of content on social media, is part of an impact operation aimed at discrediting factual information". He adds that the censorship complex uses intellectual manipulation methods, any developed by the US military during the global war on terrorism, combining them with highly sophisticated IT tools, including advanced alogrhythmic systems (so-called artificial intelligence). The leaders of this complex fear that the net and social media platforms strengthen the message and position of populists, alternate and marginal personalities and views they consider destabilising.
What is characteristic, national officials and government agencies formerly active in the fight against the muslim State (ISIS) and terrorism, later in the fight against “extremists”, are now focusing on tracking down “missions”.
Journalists were prohibited from disclosing the obtained secret papers (the position of the Aspen Institute and Stanford University Cyber Politics Center 2020). It was considered to be ‘harmful’ to supply accurate information on COVID-19 vaccines as they caused citizens' concerns about taking a holiday.
Shellenberger defined "Industrial Censorship Complex" (CIC) as "a network of ideologically adapted government institutions, non-governmental and academic organizations which have gained censorial power in fresh years to defend their own interests from the volatility and hazard of democratic processes". They do not "defence democracy" – they say. "Moreover, they defend their own policies and financial interests, harming democracy".
According to his investigation, the “complement” was created, among others, by the National discipline Foundation (NSF), which since January 2021 donated government grants to discipline on “to counter misinformation” in social media. Forty-two universities received 64 grants. The NSF has created a fresh investigation way "track F" on disinformation and censorship called "Trust and Authenticity in Communication Systems", justifying its censorship programme with the request to defend civilian society.
Examples of programs that have obtained grants are: WiseDex on "using crowd wisdom and artificial intelligence techniques to aid mark more posts;" Hacks/Hakers: a set of tools to "build trust around controversial topics specified as vaccine effectiveness"; Ohio State University: CO:CAST "helps decision makers manage the information environment"; Meedan: Co·Insights "allows social cooperation, facts check and academic work to cooperate and respond effectively to emerging misinformation narratives fueling social conflicts and mistrust" etc.
The "Cenzury Industrial Complex" is to usage the tools of the Department of Defense, originally developed to combat terrorists, e.g. the "Social Media in strategical Communication (SMISC)" program created in 2011 by DARPA (Defense Advanced investigation Projects Agency) "to aid identify misinformation or fraudulent campaigns and counter them with real information". The program involves detecting misinformation, recognizing the structure of persuasion campaigns and influencing operations on social networks and social media, identifying participants and intentions, and measuring the effectiveness of persuasion campaigns and sending common messages regarding detected influence operations by the opponent. The same model uses e.g. "Course Correct".
In addition to the NSF, CISA, established in the Department of interior safety (DHS) in 2018, played an crucial function in the organized Censorship task following actions taken by Barack Obama administration.
Schellenberger claims that Digital Forensics investigation (DFR) laboratory created in the Atlantic Council is 1 of the “most recognized and influential professional censorship institutions in the world”. Atlantic Council DFR laboratory established a abroad DisinfoPortal portal in June 2018, straight in collaboration with the National Endowment for Democracy (NED) and 23 organizations to censor certain electoral narratives before the 2019 European elections.
Since 2018, Atlantic Council has been an authoritative Facebook/Meta partner in the fight against global disinformation. Think tank is funded by funds from, among others, the United States Department of Defense, State Department, USAID, National Endowment for Democracy, as well as energy companies and arms manufacturers.
Another entity active in the “Cenzury Industrial Complex” is Graphika: a private company that analyses the network for “foreign interference in elections” that received funds from the Department of defence from the unit liable for conducting intellectual warfare and from DARPA.
Moonshot CVE is another private company (based in London) to counter the radicalization of “right-wingers” on the Internet. The technological startup created in 2015 specializes in combating "conspiracy theory", sex force and human trafficking. He is associated with Elizabeth Neumann, a erstwhile assistant secretary of the DHS for combating terrorism.
Foreign Influence Task Force, a cyber regulation agency that consists of members of the FBI, DHS and ODI, is besides active in the Censorical Complex. In addition, another institution: Global Engagement Center, an analytical branch of the U.S. State Department, which through national fact-checking organizations deals with combating misinformation and detecting Russian bot networks. Finally, Hoemland safety Information Network announces accounts.
Under the Censorship Complex, the Election Integration task operates – a partnership of 4 government-funded Censorship organisations: Stanford net Observatory, Graphika, Atlantic Council’s Digital Forensic investigation Lab, the University of Washington Disinformation Laboratory, which tracks, among others, Russian disinformation.
Schellenberger argues that many of the people from the Censoric complex were active in spreading misinformation, trying to discredit the real news, convincing that the content they marked was "conspiracy theories" specified as those concerning the origin of COVID-19.
This is how a global censorship strategy is created. KNOW THE fact – THE NEWEST BOOK OF STELMS ALREADY AVAILABLE
A strategy of extended censorship tested during the alleged pandemic was to be designed by American and British military contractors and an interview led by a investigator of the British Defence Secretariat Sarah-Jayne "SJ" Terp in 2019 with Facebook (a model of public-private partnership). This strategy was implemented in the US and the UK between 2020 and 2021 and aimed to gag unfavorable narratives, not just "misleading facts", and to exert force on social media platforms to remove or prevent the spread of certain content on social media, e.g. narratives against lockdowns. Lists of persons were created of those who were undesirable by the hashtag authorities and detailed data from their biography were included in the spreadsheet in order to conduct reputational harm operations. The group acted on platforms with a request to “remove” sites.
As part of the offensive activities, the strategy created by Terp and its colleagues from MisinfoSec was used, which referred to tactics and disinformation techniques and to influence previously developed by MITRE's specialist, defence and intelligence agency contractor adapted by Terp for civilian purposes. It was taken from the experience of the arabian Spring. A framework was created for the DISARM system, which besides served the planet wellness Organisation to "anti-vaccinators" across Europe.
Terp included the concept of “cognition security” and information safety in the system, referring to operations carried out by US and UK services abroad. The actions did not focus solely on olaging or placing informing labels on certain posts and pages, placing data on black lists. They besides included actions to discredit individuals as a essential condition, which then allowed to request censorship against them, training influential people (influencers) to distribute certain messages and demanding banks cut off financial services to people organising pickets or another events. A broad cooperation has been described with Israeli cybersecurity experts and officers and “volunteers” from respective twelve countries around the planet active in the Censorical Complex.
A number of details are included in the mid-term study of the Judicial Committee of 5 February 2024 (The weatherization of the national discipline foundation: how NSF is based the improvement of automated tools to censor online velocity “at scale” and trying to cover up its actions). It confirms the unauthorised action to limit certain viewpoints and advance the narratives desired by the authorities.
The Commission and the Subcommittee shall examine the "collussion" of national officials with 3rd organization intermediaries, including universities, non-profit organisations and enterprises, aimed at censoring protected statements on social media.
The Commission and the Subcommittee stressed that they had discovered serious violations of the first amendment by the executive authority, pointing out that "Biden's White home straight exerted force on large social media platforms specified as Facebook to censor real information, memes and satire, yet leading to a change in Facebook content moderation policy".
The question was, what happens if censorship is automated and censors are machines? Then you don't gotta organize work for thousands of fact-checkers, make immense teams to mark problematic content online. Tools based on alleged artificial intelligence can monitor online speech on a scale that far surpasses even the largest group of bureaucrats and disinformation researchers.
It was for this intent – the automation of censorship – that hundreds of millions of dollars came from taxpayers' money, which was distributed to the NSF among scholars. It has been warned that as a result, there may be a much greater threat to freedom of speech as a consequence of the creation of a "censorship regime", changing the rights of millions of Americans in an immediate and mostly undetected manner.
Another mid-term study by the same committee of the judiciary of May 2024 revealed how he censored Facebook, YouTube and Amazon (The Censorship-Industrial Complex: how to top Biden White home Officials coerced large Tech to censor Americans, actual information and criticals of the Biden Administration).
The Commission noted that “the White home of Biden's run was mostly successful and its effects were devastating. By suppressing freedom of speech and deliberately distorting public debate, ideas and policies were no longer honestly tested and discussed in terms of their advantages. Instead, policy makers have implemented a number of public wellness measures that have proved disastrous for the country. From unnecessary extended school closures to unconstitutional vaccination orders that forced workers to receive a recently developed vaccine or hazard losing their jobs. Biden's administration and another officials unnecessarily caused the harm and suffering of Americans across the country."
The Commission noted that it was thanks to the litigation and the publication of "twitter files" after Elon Musk took over the company that it was possible to get acquainted with the behind-the-ground efforts of the Biden White home to censor political opponents and views of unfavorable power.
Officials demanded censorship of information that did not violate the principles of moderation of large Tech content. Even a list of books posted in the world’s largest online bookshop was discussed. The company implemented a strategy of automated scanning of the content of books around the clock, 7 days a week, in addition to having a squad of about 100 people who manually checked the content of books. Books against vaccinations were removed.
In August 2021, Facebook's leadership asked Misinfo Policy "to brainstorm on additional policy levers that we can usage to be more aggressive towards... misinformation", as demanded by the Biden administration.
The Commission found that "Biden's White home censorship run was targeted at real information, satire and another content that did not violate the principles of platforms. Contrary to their claims of a desire to fight the alleged misinformation and abroad misinformation, Biden's administration has put force on companies to censor real information, satire, memes, opinions and entries on American individual experiences." The ‘humoristic or satirical content suggesting that the vaccine is not safe’ was removed.
The Chief Doctor demanded the removal of “real information on side effects” of vaccines.
Zuckerberg, the head of Facebook, complained that if they broke their own standards due to force from the administration, they would regret it.
Technology companies were under force from the White home due to the fact that they had another crucial issues to deal with with the administration, for example, the issue of data flow.
"Facebook Files" reveals correspondence with White home officials on the censorship of "anti-vaccine contents". " YouTube Files" indicate, among others, YouTube activity under force from the White House, which decided to remove even "border content" – i.e. content that did not violate YouTube's rules. The platform was praised for the "proposal" of September 2021 on the extension of censorship. Amazon was instructed not to advance anti-vaccine books.
The Commission noted that "Facebook did not know precisely what to censor to satisfy Biden's White home and, consequently, censored even more real information", "negative information or opinions on vaccines" and "humoristic or satirical content".
The opinions of the unfavorable left were censored. In fact, while inactive in the election campaign, Biden announced that removing the content of the unfriendly left would be the highest priority.
For example, a list of 12 entities whose posts were to be removed immediately was created. The Facebook authorities lamented that the list of CCDH Disinformation twelve proved problematic due to the fact that the posts of any entities were "completely harmless" according to Facebook's interior assessment.
Biden's White home put force on Facebook to censor administrative critics including Tucker Carlson, Tomi Lahren and another conservative media.
Internal notes show that the White home wanted "concrete information on the effectiveness of intervention", i.e. data on the effectiveness of Facebook censorship. 1 of Rob Flaherty's officials asked Facebook about the "significant impact" of the "changes in the algorithm so that people read NYT, WSJ more often, any reliable origin of information, not the regular Wire or Tomi Lahren, polarizing people."
Officials were outraged that Facebook did not remove the memo Leonardo DiCaprio, which straight compared COVID-19 vaccines to asbestos poisoning "in a way that demonstrably inhibits assurance in COVID vaccines among the people that the Biden administration is trying to reach".
At the same time, Facebook employees complained in their interior correspondence that the definition of "mission" of Biden's administration was "totally vague" and that "it seems that erstwhile the vaccination run is not proceeding as expected, it is convenient for them to blame us."
In his discussion, Facebook pointed out that in the Chief Doctor's warning, "mission" was defined as "including those publishing real information about experiencing uncommon side effects".
In April 2021, Rob Flaherty sent an email to Google, YouTube's parent company, demanding changes in moderation in specified a way as to guarantee control over vaccination criticism.
Just 2 days later, YouTube Product manager Neal Mohan posted material on the blog, discussing the company's approach to misinformation. Mohan added that "we are now removing almost 10 million films quarterly" and that "since February 2020 we have removed over 1 million films related to dangerous coronavirus information".
In the following month, YouTube introduced fresh rules to remove “bad” information, questioning the safety or effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines.
The Commission noted that "the cooperation between Google and YouTube with the White home on misinformation lasted after 2021 and expanded to cover issues beyond COVID-19 and vaccines. For example, on 17 March 2022, Tim Wu, a peculiar assistant president for technology and competition, asked Google to meet to discuss “Russian misinformation/disinformation”, as well as “air lines competition”. On 16 June 2022, Google's public policy squad sent an email to White home personnel, in which they informed them of "the activities of YouTube on climate misinformation". On 14 July 2022, YouTube government personnel contacted White home staff, offering them information on "updates related to solving problems related to misinformation on reproductive wellness on YouTube", to which White home staff replied that they are "particularly curious in abortion". And on August 3, 2022, a Google Public Policy worker responded to an email from Rob Flaherty, thanking Flaherty for his ideas on how “the Google Platforms can aid inform and educate voters” and recommended Flaherty to meet with the “Left Election Team” so that he could “go deeper” about educating voters.
The Commission and the peculiar Subcommittee added that Biden's administration could have attempted to censor statements on another topics than coronavirus, specified as climate, abortion and inflation.
"Amazon Files" revealed that Biden's White home besides ran a run of force on net bookstores. In March 2021, Biden's White home officials criticized Amazon, the world's largest online bookshop, for offering books that questioned the safety or effectiveness of vaccines, including recently developed vacancyes against COVID-19. In the face of force from the White House, Amazon reacted quickly, implementing a fresh policy that imposed restrictions on "anti-vaccination books" within a week.
The Commission noted that "The pressures of Biden's White home on Amazon show that despite alleged claims of attempts to combat viral alleged misinformation on social media, the real intent of the White home censorship run was to censor unpopular statements, regardless of their form".
Officials complained about the “high level of propaganda, misinformation and misinformation” in the online bookstore. Amazon's management has taken action to classify all books expressing doubts about vaccination as ‘extremistic’ and not to advance or even remove them.
Flaherty, Slavitt and another key members of Biden's White home censorship regime, who had already left their posts, thought censorship was justified. Slavitt published a book entitled "Preventable: The Inside communicative of How Leadership Failures, Politics, and Selfishness Doomed the U.S. Coronavirus Response", in which he criticized Americans for almost fanatical attachment to the first amendment and opposing sanitary warnings during the alleged covid pandemic. He wrote about “obsessing on the freedom of the individual, even at the expense of the lives and wellness of others.” The Commission commented as follows: "Slavitt's sincere message underlines the arrogance of the Biden White home and its contempt for fundamental civilian liberties". It was added that "Constitution is not suspended in times of crisis" and "the first amendment did not harm life and health Americans; on the contrary, if Biden's White home and administration had followed the first amendment, so much unnecessary pain and suffering could have been avoided. As public wellness measures could not be honestly discussed by the public and assessed on the basis of their advantages, the Biden administration and another decision-makers imposed public wellness measures that were devastating to students, workers and another Americans throughout the country. present they are widely considered stupid. Statements... Trust in Science they proved to have no technological basis. For a time the fact was censored, and disinformation was spread by experts, including the Biden administration. America needs a free and open debate on burning problems, and Biden's administration should have trusted the intelligence of the American people to make their own decisions."
It was added that "the examination of constitutional violations by the executive authority is not enough; legislative reforms are needed" and that is why the home of Representatives are working on adopting fresh rules that will further strengthen the right of Americans to free speech. Members of the peculiar Subcommittee proposed a draft law on the protection of freedom of expression and a law on the work for censorship, which will enable national workers to be held liable for violating the rights of Americans under the first amendment.
Report of 30 October 2024 (Election Interference: how the FBI “prebunked” a actual communicative about the Biden Family’s correspondence in advance of the 2020 presidential election) describes how the FBI, along with another actors, interfered with the electoral process and carried out a public disinformation action, misleading the circulation of influences by the Biden household (compromising the contents of the laptop of the president's boy huntsman Biden), suggesting that the disclosure of these data was “Russian misinformation”. This was not "Russian disinformation", but real information, facts that were not to be seen before the 2020 presidential election.
Other more targeted investigations are besides being conducted in the U.S. legislature on, for example, the impact of the Censor complex on the competitiveness of tiny enterprises (Small Business: Instruments and Casualties of the Censorship-Industrial Complex The home Committee on tiny Business). This investigation will proceed until 2026. But it has already been established and described the cooperation of national officials with different start-ups to test the mechanisms of automated censorship, mapping the information space and marking the entities allegedly sowing "MDM information" (projects Atlantic Council or NewsGuard, Global Disinformation Index, etc.).
33 operational tools were tested with 25 participating offices including GEC, DOD, embassies and abroad governments. 8 tests resulted in a longer implementation, while others resulted in an interest in a longer period of usage by participants outside the GEC, depending on the availability of funding.
More than 100 technologies have been active in the GEC method demonstration series, including "psychological resilience tools, blockchain validation technology, crowdsourcing information verification and social media monitoring products".
So-called artificial intelligence is utilized not only to verify content but besides to monitor trends, identifying anomalies in discussions, misinformation and misinformation and identifying their sources.
Data are collected from various sources of social media, micro expression and another physiological and biometric data obtained from the reflection of users of video recordings, assessing indicators of emotional context, projection and hidden expression and physiological reactions to stimuli. Millions of films are processed from global, publically available sources.
It follows, measures and analyses narratives, sub-narrations and basic content from more than 20 sources, including social media. It identifies, quantifies and traces narratives in large-scale media conversations. It analyses memes, automates communicative investigation on visual platforms specified as TikTok, detects and measures viral moments erstwhile they begin to appear before reaching critical mass.
The ‘artificial intelligence’ shall be utilized to identify the most influential ‘actors’ in any set of cumulative or recently collected data, to identify links, to find hidden activities and to identify sponsors.
Data sets from physical, information and cognitive dimensions are integrated by geospatial contextualisation.
Social media and temper analysis are utilized to get data to make campaigns to change behaviors that solve mark problems. It fights misinformation, utilizing local influencers. Many of these operations affect US government agencies: DOD, DOJ, FBI, DHS, CISA, GSA, USAID and USAGM.
All these actions are not limited to the US market, but already have negative consequences in Europe, where thousands of people are sentenced to prison sentences due to posts on social media, e.g. in the UK (for example, the riots of the 1920s).
In the U.S., Trump's squad immediately took a number of key decisions regarding the reinstatement of military services, which were thrown out due to refusal to accept mRNA vaccines. A backing ban has been introduced for universities and another educational institutions that inactive require testing, vaccination against COVID-19, etc. At the same time, Trump seeks the anticipation of withdrawing the pardon of president Joe Biden on Chief Doctor Antony Faucie and another persons liable for covid policy.
The current president besides seeks to appoint as head of the National wellness Institutes a persecuted Stanford epidemiologist, Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, who promised to find an alternate to investigating vaccines on cell lines formed on the basis of aborted children's cells.
Along with Dr. Martin Kulldorff, prof. of medicine at Harvard University, and Dr. Sunetra Gupta, prof. at Oxford University, Dr. Jay Bhattacharya was a supporter of the alleged Declaration of large Barrington, which highlighted serious concerns about the harmful effects on physical and intellectual wellness of covid politics commonly utilized by governments during the alleged pandemic.
American researchers are besides discussing the withdrawal of mRNA vaccines at all due to the fact that they contain artificial genetic code. Synthetic RNA can origin toxicity leading to cancer, inflammation or autoimmune diseases.
In many another countries, including Poland, however, there are no lessons learned from apparent abuses, and medics who had the courage to tell the fact about vaccines and the consequences of covid policy.
Agnieszka Stelmach
This is how a global censorship strategy is created. KNOW THE fact – THE NEWEST BOOK OF STELMS ALREADY AVAILABLE
