Many Polish independent commentators make a major mistake about BRICS – they want it now, rapidly and effectively. It's a large mistake. 1 can gag that BRICS is specified a global thought with the usage of Endetic thinking. Evolutionary redevelopment of planet order, putting on effect, not performance. BRICS is not to be a fresh Komintern (which saddens communists), a terceristic global (which saddens nationalists) or an other reflection of Euro-Atlantic structures (which saddens anti-systemists – if they truly exist). It's expected to be fairer, but besides more sovereign. BRICS is very careful not to make mistakes of global Western organizations – it does not want to furniture the individual systems or interfere with customs and worldview issues. It's a beautiful well thought-out global thought that doesn't request an artificial rush. In my opinion, its future goals are three: 1) Maintaining planet peace between diverse blocks and state systems. 2) economical competitiveness against the dominance of the US dollar and the departure from the dictatorship of the planet Bank. 3) United States (NATO) hegemony fracture in the planet military system. BRICS can become a form of organizing the non-Western planet (above Euro-Atlantic “civilisation”) The reality has changed and America and Europe do not want to accept it. India has become the most populous country in the world, and China has reached the position of the largest economy. Russia breaks down the loose ties that it had with the Euro-Atlantic world. Awareness of the future importance of black Africa is awakened. BRICS' chance is to preserve, preserve, respect for non-revolutionary and anti-revolutionary spirit. It is for the present time that the West wants revolution and war. A planet revolution in the moral-ethical sphere and an economic-armoured confrontation with the East, in peculiar Russia.
So I do not realize why any commentators anticipate BRICS to go against the UN or WHO. It's trying to force any global Rejtan. This is not understandable, especially given China's influence in the WHO and the position of UN Secretary-General Antonio Guteresh towards BRICS itself. This isn't about a full confrontation with the Western world. It's about trying to rebuild unfair economic-military arrangements. The countries of the global south draw here from the doctrine of the far east, or at least from Vatican practice – “God's mills grind slowly...” In many aspects of BRICS, I believe, he will be looking forward to working with today's antagonists in the United States and Europe. Today's planet is so globalized that it is impossible to build a camp of a hermetically closed economy. This is, of course, an chance for Poland, not a threat.
BRICS is simply a comparatively fresh political concept and it is not entirely clear which way it will go. There are aspects that worry the head of climate or the smoldering imperialist aspirations of any countries. Today, however, this is the most serious form of non-Euro-Atlantic organization of national countries in fresh decades. Due to its loose form, it is acceptable to those who advocate the supremacy of national states over global organisations. However, we must be aware that BRICS will not become an anti-globalist force in a strict sense. As a substance of principle, the structure of various states, nations, races, religions and civilizations cannot be anti-globalist. It can become alterglobalistic and respect the diversity of life organization by individual nations and states. This is the strong side of BRICS, this could be the strongest side of this movement. It is simply a loose federation, not a decision to establish a superstate.
The ability to cooperate despite natural differences in those areas where there are common objectives is simply a large asset to this agreement. Individual states do not lose their identity and who to defend their interests. besides the ones that stand out inside the federation. BRICS is not a revolutionary organization, and fortunately for us Poles will not search to trigger any planet revolution or support wars. For us, peace and future favourable relations with the rising force of the “Global South” and the dwarfing “Euroatlantic Civilization” are most beneficial. I would like Poland and wider east Europe to become a bridge connecting these 2 worlds, part of a transit route, a fresh silk trail, a gathering place and a place of business. present it seems completely abstract. But a twelve years ago, the case of Turkey (a NATO member) or Saudi Arabia (a Washington associate) in the arabian planet was similar. tiny European countries like Hungary and Slovakia show us what the art of lavirants is about for the benefit of their own people.
For today, BRICS has succeeded in building an informational and propaganda counterweight to Euroatlanticism. With its message it reaches most people in the world. Whether we can break the military and financial hegemonies of the West will show the coming years. He has a immense chance.
