Biernacki: How to solve the migration crisis on the border with Belarus?

myslpolska.info 5 months ago

From time to time, we hear journalists press politicians with the question: is simply a wall on the border with Belarus needed? You can get the impression that this wall, in the opinion of the questioners, is the main remedy for the border crisis.

Of course – it is not and as specified will not solve any crisis. Wall, it's a classical medicine that cures symptoms, not causes. I hope that yet any writer will ask the correct question, like those in the title of the article.

Proceedings – USA and Merkel

Of course, correct answers will be uncomfortable and even dangerous for the questioner, but it is time to end this game of appearances. In order to respond honestly to these questions, the politicians indigo must, as the main remedy for the migration crisis, postulate major changes in our abroad policy and thus critically address the policy of the past, thoughtlessly cultivated for more than 3 decades. Of course, this politician, or politician, must first of all criticise the U.S.-led assault wars in the mediate East, which destabilise the region and make a number of refugees and, secondly, introduced by Angela Merkel Open Door PolicyIt’s okay. ” "If Angela Merkel manages to unload the exile crisis, she will most likely deserve a peaceful Nobel. Worse, for the Germans and their neighbours, if she had failed.” – so in 2015 he wrote in “Politics” Adam Krzemiński. Unfortunately, present we already know that it has failed, and Germany and neighbouring countries have worse than the author of the article 10 years ago. Editor Krzemiński mistakenly assumed that even if it failed, it would not win as a consequence of unsuccessful attempts to correct errors. In fact, politicians, authors of these errors (this is simply a very mild term), have been convincing us for a decade that it is not mistakes, but successes and methodically worsen the situation.

Talk to Minsk and Moscow

Of course, physical protection of the border is simply a essential but immediate solution. However, this problem will not be solved without average diplomatic relations with Belarus and Russia, which the Polish side systematically worsens. As long as he rules Donald Tusk, Jarosław Kaczyńskiwhether the remainder of the servitude politicians towards globalists, average diplomatic relations with these countries will not be. They may even make a solid dam, shoot a fewer people, but the problem will stay as long as the Belarusian side accepts it. Does Tusk plan to shoot everyone? Will he yet start talking to Alexander Lukashenko and Vladimir PutinTo truly solve the problem? After all, there are women and children among people who are nomadic on the border. In case of the shooting of minors with mothers, it will be a gigantic image defeat of Poland. We are not Israel, so no 1 will hold back from condemnation.

The Revolution ate Ochoan.

Over a year ago Janina Ochoska was a certain KO candidate on the spot, in the EP election. Over a year ago, Mrs Ochojska fought against “soyusz evil”: Putin, Lukashenko, Kaczyński and the Polish army. They tried to disturb the uniform in guarding the border with Belarus, calling them by the way from the worst. present Tusk is inactive fighting this hostile alliance, only the wisdom of the phase is different. The Polish army is fine now, due to the fact that we must halt the Muslim war, which according to the authorities is no longer a gathering of mediocre people fleeing war and poverty, only a tool in the hands of Putin and Lukashenko aimed at the brightest Republic. So you gotta build firewalls, minefields and device guns. Mrs Ochojska did not adapt to the changes, so Tusk “took it and spit it out” and her Brussels sonekura passed distant with the wind. Therefore, mediocre Mrs. Janina methodically criticizes and instructs the bad Tusk. Well, the revolution eats its own children.

Poland itself supported destabilisation

Of course, it is not that Mrs Ochojska is the essence of good and nobility, due to the fact that she wants to aid people, and Tusk is simply a cynical boy of a bitch who no longer wants to do this and has moved 180 degrees due to the fact that it is politically profitable for him now. Both are politicians, loyal primarily to globalists. Therefore, the categories of good and evil in these considerations do not make much sense. Of course, it is highly likely that these immigrants are a tool in the hands of the government of Belarus, and possibly besides Russia. However, this does not change the fact that these people have come to Europe as a better world, due to the fact that they have war, unstable situation and poverty. It is hard to blame Mrs Ochojska for the war and destabilization of the mediate East, where most nomadic people on the Polish border come from. erstwhile the U.S. waged force wars there with the eager support of Poland, frequently with the participation of our soldiers, Mrs Ochojska was not a politician, but Donald Tusk was and supported, so she is active in destabilising the region, that is, in the “production” of immigrants for Lukashenko. However, Mrs Ochojska and Mrs Donald Tusk are liable for the escalation of the problem at the border, erstwhile present only physical protection remains.

In abroad business

Mrs Janina crying present forgot that 4 years ago, in the name of the Atlantic interests, as a MEP, she was making diplomatic relations with Belarus worse. She endorsed a resolution in which the European Parliament did not recognise the results of the presidential elections in Belarus, "renamed" at the same time the president of the Swiatlana Cichanouskawhich by decision of the Polish government, for our money, lived (or inactive lives) luxuriously in Poland. This was another act of worsening our relations with Belarus. Mrs. Cichanouska is already forgotten by Polish public opinion, but at a time erstwhile she was fashionable, politicians from all the ruling coalition present and the PiS – the organizer of this hucpa – walked to her. I remember she was a diamond back then. Agnieszka Romaszewska and associate Michał Szczerba from Tusk.

As long as we have politicians working in the interests of abroad courts, problems like this border will be more and more.

The first step, or liquidation of Belsat

In order to resolve the migration crisis on the border with Belarus, 2 basic conditions must be met. Poland will cease its hostile actions towards the Republic of Belarus to overthrow Alexander Lukashenko, which are usually expanding during the presidential elections there. So utilizing fashionable terms recently, Poland will halt the hybrid war against Belarus. In this case, 1 very crucial step has been taken. Donald Tusk has greatly weakened Belsat, a center initiating and coordinating hostile actions towards our neighbour. The post of the long-term head of this station should not be regarded as a motion friendly to Belarus, but alternatively as a negative assessment of the effectiveness of Agnieszka Romaszewski in the Belarusian section. After 17 years of being bitten by Romaszewski, the power in Belarus has not even shaken and is doing great. There are rumours that Donald Tusk has an inept Belsat reorganize, or make something more effective in this place. However, knowing our Prime Minister, we know that he can destruct it, but creating something fresh comes with large difficulty, so I don't think there will be any. The second essential condition for ending the migration crisis on the Belarusian border is to improve relations with the Russian Federation. If it is actual what our government media are constantly telling us, that migrants are besides a tool in the hands of the Russian administration to destabilise the situation in Poland, the more we request to have average diplomatic relations with this country.

Need for gestures from Poland

These are the 2 essential conditions to sit down for trilateral talks in order to end this crisis. The initiative should be on the Polish side, due to the fact that we did more to make these relations worse. With Belarus, the substance is much simpler, due to the fact that we are formally and in fact not active in the armed action against this country. Unfortunately, we are informally active in specified actions against Russia. Making Poland hub transshipment to supply the Ukrainian army, whether our aggressive and highly hostile towards Russia, but besides dangerous to Poles, abroad policy, including inciting NATO states to war, are only 2 of these examples. If we want Belarus and the Russians to start actively fixing the situation at the border, we must offer them something. From the position of instigator of war, Poland should turn to the position of instigator to peace, that is, our politicians should take the example of Robert Ficy and Viktor Orbán. Of course. hub cargo handling in Rzeszów should be importantly reduced, and preferably eliminated. It's a minimum to sit down with Lukashenko and Putin for conversation.

My postulate is absolutely right and it would have been fulfilled long ago if we were ruled by politicians who were guided by the interests of Poland and Polish citizens. Nothing lasts forever, so possibly we'll see about that. But even those now ruling realize perfectly well that the wall will not solve any political problem, but will make these problems. As a physical barrier, it will temporarily limit illegal border crossings. Like the Berlin Wall, which was politically utilized to specified an degree that people undressed it.

The wall between the brothers only hurts

The fact that Poland is detached from Belarus by a physical barrier, which is an extension of the "political denial" evidently does not service Poles or Belarusians. Two, possibly the closest nations to each other, which for centuries functioned in 1 state body, having shared heroes, now in the interests of the powerful of this planet are shared. Only due to the fact that the powerful of this planet does not like the political order in Belarus, which prevents them from influence in this country. Only a fewer years ago, the average Pole could fall for propaganda, that there is democracy in us, and in Belarus not and for the benefit of the Belarusians, the collective West should establish western democracy there and, of course, join Belarus in its sphere of influence. It didn't work out, which our countryman most likely had quite a few influence on. Ivan Tertel And his organs. present the average Pole knows that Western democracy is flawed at best and is frequently a lie. We are ruled by a "deep state" which brutally and openly interferes with the results of democratic elections if they are not in line with his expectations. In fresh months, in many countries, we have been going through an accelerated course of Western “democracy”. We are now looking forward to what the "deep state" will do to the winner of the first circular of presidential elections in Romania, after the annulment of its results. all wall on the border of the collective West is to perpetuate the influences of these invisible forces that destruct the remnants of our freedom, arguing at the same time that they defend it. It is advanced time that journalists pressed politicians with questions about the collapse of democracy and the emergence of murderism.

Cezary Michał Biernacki

Read Entire Article