All conflicts in Poland are beneficial to our enemies. There's not much information about that in the media, due to the fact that these, fighting for audiences and advertisers, have another interests. Just destabilization is financially beneficial.
Destabilization is simply a wonderful condition and possibly even a tool, above all to accomplish certain political objectives. It's a political theatre. The most interesting thing is what happens backstage.
Prof. Daniela Schwarzer - German political scientist and board associate of the Bertelsmann Foundation, leading expert in European and global affairs, associate of DGAP (German Council of abroad Relations), and associate of the French Legion of Honor about 2017 - in an interview published by the Virtual Poland portal on 2 January 2024...
... and, above all, the author of the study prepared by French and German experts on the request for a deep improvement of the European Union, which calls for a departure from the right of veto for the associate States, makes clear and changes:
"...which would make the EU towards a national strategy with reinforced European sources of legitimacy and its decisions".
"If a country is convinced that a decision can be taken against it and is crucial for its sovereignty, it may decision the dispute to the European Council, which decides unanimously".
The above conviction may calm down and be an argument to waive the right of veto, but Prof. Daniel Schwarzer later adds:
"It is advanced time for EU decision-making to become more effective to increase its operational capacity in an increasingly hostile world. If we just realized that any countries say "we don't want to quit sovereignty" and period, it wouldn't make sense to make this report, would it? As I said earlier, we must clearly specify what it means to defend sovereignty in these troubled times."
citing, for example, Viktor Orban, and Article 7 of the TEU vis-à-vis the breaking of the regulation of law of the associate State of Prof. Daniel Schwarzer, he maintains his view that countries that "break the regulation of law" do not receive the funds, where the abolition of unanimity is crucial. It is known that this is simply a threat to what we have been dealing with – not to the law, but to the EU's self-recognition that individual violates the regulation of law and so on. The EU will decide who breaks the regulation of law. Thus, the above-mentioned assurance:
"If a country is convinced that a decision can be taken against it and is crucial for its sovereignty, it may decision the dispute to the European Council, which decides unanimously".
... are just empty words to lull the vigilance of the sceptics of the EU federalization. The country will not receive money, despite its contribution to the EU common budget, according to an interview. Ensuring sovereignty in the European Council is just a game of appearances.
"Poland is so a key player. And from the position of Germany, he is besides a key player in the single market, where Germany and the Poles lost Britain as an ally in a very well-functioning triangle forging its reinforcement."
It should be read this way: Germany wants to control the Polish market.
"It was Poland that was right about Nord Stream and Putin's intentions towards Ukraine, as were the Baltic countries. Therefore, I think that we request to rebuild bilateral relations after all the campaigns in Poland and the negative narratives that were present in them."
Curious fact is that prof. Dr. Daniela Schwarzer, is simply a associate of the Bertelsmann Stiftung Foundation Board, Reinhard Mohn, volunteer for the Luftwaffe. His father Heinrich Mohn was an SS supporting associate – he donated to another Nazi organizations.
In 1947, Mohn took over management at C. Bertelsmann publishing house. He replaced his murmuring father there. As English Wikipedia writes:
"Heinrich Mohn belonged to the SS's patrons ellipse and sought to transform his company into a Nazi-style company. During planet War II, C. Bertelsmann Verlag became the leading supplier for the Wehrmacht, surpassing even Franz Eher, the central publishing home of the Nazi party. In particular, between 1939 and 1941, the income of "C. Bertelsmann Verlag" increased sharply. The judaic forced laborers were not forced to work in Gütersloh, but in the printing houses in Lithuania, with which C. Bertelsmann Verlag worked.”
Anyway, the Financial Times says: Multibillion South Korean arms transactions threatened after elections in Poland, And the article in TheKoreaTimes saysTusk would break the deal, but he's not doing it due to the war in Ukraine. However, he thinks about European arms suppliers.
What shocks the most in this full situation is the argument that the federalisation of the EU is an argument (including by Prof. Daniele Schwarzer) for EU unity, including in situations specified as the war in Ukraine, that no country will block aid to the country being attacked in terms of the risks posed by Russia.
Meanwhile:
"Disclose Journalists reported that the French were supplying Russian military equipment from 2015 to 2020. A spokesperson for the Ministry of Defence informs that there has been no breach of EU sanctions."
Republic of: ]]>https://www.rp.pl/politics/art35862581-media-franja-supply-rosja-b...]]>
"As the British paper The Telegraph states, France and Germany have armed Russia with military equipment worth EUR 273 million despite the embargo. These calculations are based on an analysis by the European Commission made available to the newspaper. The embargo gap results from the alleged "grandfather clause" and the "double destiny" rule. The first 1 was not blocked until April 8."
Business Insider: ]]>https://businessinsider.com.pl/news/the-telegraph-oto-how-Germans-and...]]>
Meanwhile, Donald Tusk in the exposure assured that he would strengthen Poland's position in the EU. He must have known then that, according to the EU interpretation, this reinforcement could only take place through federalisation and the introduction of a law limiting the sovereignty of Poland and another countries. There is simply a reason why EU representatives are pleased to change power in Poland.
The best thing, however, is that Germany accuses Poland of complicity in blowing up the Nord Stream 2 pipeline. quite a few shocking information about this case can be read here:
"Onet and Berlin operate against the Polish State – hereproof’
WP portal interview with Prof. Daniela Schwarzer:
M. Gostakiewicz, large EU Reform. Expert: From the position of Germany Poland is in this key debate, 2 January 2024 Virtual Poland, ]]>https://news.wp.pl/great-reform-ue-expert-with-perspective...]]>
