The fallout of the Russian Federation is far little dangerous than leaving it in the hands of criminals
The invasion of Ukraine is simply a direct continuation of Russia's imperial and colonial politics; a policy that never ceased to exist. Russian aggression against Ukraine was combined with a propaganda run denying the existence of the Ukrainian people, the genocide carried out in the Ukrainians, and the colonization of occupied territories by cultural Russians. This is what happens in Mariupolu, Donbasa or Bakczysaraj. Russia's policy in these cases is simply a repetition of the 1 known from Krasna Polana or Kamchatka in the 19th century.
Whether we are dealing with Tsarsk, Soviet, or led by Putin, Russia does not change over the centuries. It follows the same imperial instincts, repeating the same scheme: conquest, genocide, colonization, and then seeking silent acceptance of position quo, and bribing the global community with a mirage of economical cooperation or illusion of a immense Russian market. We cannot be deceived to think that Moscow can be a partner in solving any global problems. Let us remember that even if Russia was falsely perceived as a stabilising force in Europe, this was at the expense of the nations of my region, my country, which was the subject of partitions and occupations made by Russia. Moscow had already planned to proceed to "go to the West", export its "stabilization" in the 19th century or revolution in the 20th century. Moscow is not ashamed to openly repeat this imperialist strategy in Ukraine in the 21st century. Therefore, Moscow's imperialism must end erstwhile and for all.
We should be aware that Putin and his gang of war criminals are not the cause, but the consequence of the problem, the origin of which is the authoritarian and imperial being of Moscow and the phobia of Ochrana, KGB or FSB, which the Russian state mastered long ago. Russian imperialism has very deep roots. Today, however, we are not in the 16th century of Ivan the Terrible or 18th century of Catherine II, but in the 21st century – the century of global law, common organizations and common values. The European Parliament and many another parliaments around the planet have recognised the Russian Federation as a terrorist state. specified designation has certain consequences. This terrorist organization in state form, even if seen by many as an empire, should be dismantled. Otherwise, we should have no uncertainty that, in the blind desire to keep the "imperium", another criminals in his leadership will proceed to pose constant threats, destabilisation, hybrid attacks and wars with neighbours and another countries, and enslave and oppress their own citizens. Therefore, as in the case of the 3rd German Reich, being an existential threat to humanity and the global order, The Russian Federation should undergo drastic changes. It is naive to believe that the Russian Federation, after its final defeat, may stay within the same constitutional and territorial framework. It has never happened in past that specified a centralised empire, subjecting itself to so many nations, will stay unchanged after defeat in a crucial war. Therefore, the global community cannot occupy a comfortable position of looking aside, waiting for developments, but must take a courageous initiative to support the refederalisation of the Russian state, taking into account the past of Russian imperialism and respect for the rights and desires of the Russian peoples. Victims of Russian imperialism should be able to rebuild their own statehood, exercise the right to celebrate their heritage and decide their own future.
Unfortunately, we cannot draw any affirmative conclusions from anti-war demonstrations organised by Russian society in or outside the country, due to the fact that there are no specified protests. However, we should draw lessons from mass protests against the submission of Moscow to the Federation regions, specified as Ingushetia or Far East Chabarovsk.
There is no specified thing as Russian gas, oil, aluminum, coal, uranium, diamonds, grain, forests, gold, etc. All these resources are Tatar, Bashkir, Siberian, Karel, Oyrat, Cherkish, Buriat, Yakut, Ural, Cuban, Legic, etc. For the majority of these regions — whether cultural Russians or indigenous people — Moscow only means war, repression, exploitation, and hopelessness. The harassment and discrimination of cultural minorities in Russia is on the agenda. Hypercentralisation exposed many weaknesses of the country, but above all the submission of theoretically autonomous regions and republics of the Kremlin's will. Moreover, Moscow is sending cultural minorities to a meat grinder in Ukraine, carrying out a actual cultural policy by further hurting both the Ukrainian people and the already conquered nations of the Far East.
Given the national and cultural map of the territories of the Russian Federation, we should discuss the prospects of free and independent states in the Russian area, as well as the prospects of their stableness and prosperity. The global community has a work to support the laws of indigenous peoples, which, as a consequence of Russian conquest and colonization, now besides be within the limits of the Russian Federation. We cannot just focus on protecting any indigenous people at the expense of others. The same rights must be accorded to Chakasoms, Tuwins, Yakutos or Evenks. We cannot underestimate the fact that cultural Russians, being the largest nation of the Russian Federation, are only 1 of many. We should focus more on the regions and peoples of the Russian Federation, their capabilities and prospects of sovereignty. We should get to know their leaders, their past and strengths. 1 must be aware that the Russian Empire denied the existence of a culture of conquered nations, frequently stealing their heritage. The Western word "cultural appropriation" has many examples in Russia, whether it is Mikhail Lermontov stealing legends of conquered Cherkies or Russians trying to separate the cultural Ukrainian Nikolay Gogol from his Ukrainian national identity.
It is crucial to be aware that the dissolution of the Russian Federation can bring serious difficulties and threats, as any transitional period. However, this hazard will be far little dangerous than leaving this aggressive empire unchanged. After the lethargy period, he will return with further aggressions, as he has done for centuries. There are many possible solutions and strategies for controlled, constructive and peaceful dismantling of the last colonial empire in Europe. The collapse of the Russian Federation will undoubtedly benefit security, including energy, and the economy of Europe and Central Asia. I agree with Janusz Bugajski[1]that fresh pro-Western states can appear from the Russian Federation, strengthening stableness in respective regions of Europe and Eurasia.
The dismantling of the last colonial empire in Europe is inevitable. It must so be controlled and constructive, addressing the issue of the imperial policy of “One Russia”. The collapse of the russian Union was a disaster for Putin and his KGB colleagues. For the Baltic countries, Ukrainians and Georgians, but besides for the Kazakhs or Kyrgyzstans it was a blessing. I am convinced that this will besides be the case in the case of the dissolution of the Russian Federation, which will bring freedom to the Iczkers, the Cherkies, the Buriats, the Chuktychs and many another nations.
Therefore, my fellow Member, Złotowski, and I welcome the chance to host a number of experts, historians, journalists, politicians from both sides of the Atlantic and leaders and representatives of more than 20 nations of the Russian Federation, who will meet in Brussels in the European Parliament to discuss the prospects of decolonising and deimperializing the Russian Federation.
Anna Fotyga, associate of the European Parliament, erstwhile Minister of abroad Affairs of the Republic of Poland
Crowd. Adam Laughter
[1]Janusz Bugajski (born 1954 in the UK), associate of the American think tank Jamestown Foundation from Washington. erstwhile associate of the Center for European Policy Analysis (CEPA) and manager of the fresh European Democracy Program at the Center for strategical and global Studies (CSIS). He collaborates with various U.S. government organizations and agendas specified as U.S. Agency for global improvement (USAID), the United States Department of Defense, the global Republican Institute (IRI), the Free Trade Union Institute (AFL-CIO), the global investigation and Exchanges Board (IREX), and besides collaborates with the BBC. Author of the book “Failed state. And Gudie is Russia’s rupture. A Guide to Russia's Breakdown). The view of the imminent collapse and the necessity of dismembering the Russian Federation is voiced.
Comment ed./translation.: Ladies and gentlemen, here we are dealing with the most serious and sinister speech by the U.S. Hegemonic forces, dressed in feathers of Polish “patriots”. Anna Fotyga has just announced publically the request to break up Russia, the actual liquidation of the Russian state and to take it over by globalist forces under the cloak of the conflict for rights, among others, of the Chukczów and Cherkies. This is simply a clear announcement of the implementation of what was unsuccessful in 1930 (the "Commivoyary's expedition to the USSR") and the definition of the US's most aggressive hegemonic environments with open viscous plans for Russia.
It is about actual planet domination, the demolition of the hated rival and the taking over of his – the world's largest – natural resources. In return, we are to have banana republics of non-Russian peoples of Russia and a veiled announcement – de facto – of the demolition of the Russian nation, as it is today, with its tradition, identity, etc.
There is no uncertainty that in practice this plan will mean a atomic planet war.
It does not substance that this plan comes out of the pen of the individual representing Poland. Nothing about our outrage here will aid – Russia and the Russians will take it in the only possible way – that Poland and Poles hatred Russia so much that not only the thought of any arrangement of average relations is simply a complete utopia, but that Poland is simply a prominent threat to Russia, as a center of thought promoting the demolition of the Russian state and, in fact, making cultural Russians subhumans surviving in a kind of a reserve. With all these consequences for Poland and for ourselves.
Of course, Mr. Fotyga is most likely expecting the triumph of the United States in the atomic war, since he speaks so openly about the demolition of Russia. Poland and the lives of all of us do not substance to her at all – or Poland only exists to harm Russia. The demolition of Poland in the war in the name of the demolition of Russia is included in the costs. And Mr Fotyg, along with Mr Bugajski, most likely hopes for a warm beach in Florida.
The question remains – purely rhetorical – why does Mr Fotyg not call for the decolonization of the US...
Adam Laughter
PS. Fatty in the text of Mr Fotygi my – AŚ.
