Four challenges that die in the background in the regular public debate, although they will decide whether Poland will usage or miss the next decade. At the same time, we find a minute erstwhile the world's power strategy is changing rapidly, and Poland has more space than usual to conduct its own policy. This window will close fast.
In the first part I described 3 areas that undermine the foundations of the Polish economy: ]]>Demography, energy and emigration]]>. In the second, I took care of ]]>health services, taxation optimization of large corporations and a trap for average development]]>In which you are stuck richer than us. Welcome to the final part of the cycle.
Record arms, silent doctrine
In 2025 Poland allocated about 4.5% of GDP to defence according to NATO dataWhich gives her first place in the alliance. We are ahead of even the United States, which has stopped at 3.2%. In absolute amounts we are talking about over PLN 180 billion, which is more than twice as much as only 4 years earlier.
But it is worth knowing precisely what is behind this indicator. In accordance with NATO methodology, we include not only the acquisition of weapons and ammunition, but besides the salaries of soldiers, military pensions, training and training costs, the maintenance of bases and training courses, investigation and improvement and participation in abroad missions. Uniform pensions alone absorb about PLN 13 billion per year in Poland and enter the 4.5% of GDP shown, even though they no longer have any influence on the real military capacity.
In the Polish public debate, there is simply a dispute about which equipment to buy and from whom – from the USA, from the European Union, or to put on own industry. It's a buying directory discussion, not strategy. Much more crucial questions are lost in the background. What dangers do we face, and in what time span? Are we preparing for a conventional conflict, a hybrid war, or possibly cyber attacks and sabotage of critical infrastructure? Do we have the ability to respond independently to the attack, or do we have the function of the last line of opposition waiting for decisions from Washington and Brussels? In which areas we want to build an advantage as a state, due to the fact that if we can't afford everything, individual has to prioritise. no of these questions are answered publicly.
Government safety Centre gathering Source: interia.pl
There's 1 thing to be honest about here. Military, analysts and decision-makers surely have their threat map and know what we're preparing for. It's their job, paid from our taxes, and there's no reason to presume they're doing it wrong. The problem is that our possible opponents most likely besides have this knowledge, due to the fact that the intelligence services of all crucial state have long studied Polish arms contracts, changes in doctrine and the deployment of individuals. However, the debate lacks the public itself. Since the opponent is inactive analyzing our purchases and the deployment of troops, the public debate will not uncover anything to him. He already has that knowledge. Instead, it takes the chance that people will know what they are fighting for and be willing to bear the cost at a time of real crisis.
The effect of this debate is already visible today. After respective years of constant intimidation of war, vague messages after subsequent objects violating our airspace and the deficiency of a coherent state consequence to these incidents, the public begins to have doubts. erstwhile the “war is in the air” is heard for 3 years in a row, human sensitivity to the message falls. No 1 can explain clearly what we are preparing for and why this is the case. As a result, the public does not really know what script the state considers most likely.
Mandatory military service in the fresh edition
Mandatory military service returns in the debate all erstwhile in a while, but the question of how specified a strategy would look present is seldom raised. It is worth considering a solution tailored to Polish social and economical realities.
Imagine a fewer months, mandatory and usually paid training after advanced school. For a start for men, possibly yet for all willing women. It is not about restoring the model of essential service that older generations mostly mention as lost months. It is simply a program in which a young man learns useful things, among others, first aid at the level of a lifeguard, handling drones, cybersecurity, driving dense vehicles, handling communications, welding, electricity, acting in a group under force and reacting to critical infrastructure failures. A postgraduate of specified training returns to a civilian with circumstantial rights useful in the labour market, specified as a category C driving licence, SEP privileges (a certificate confirming cognition of work on installations and energy networks), a medical lifeguard qualification. The training way would be based on the candidate's erstwhile education and predisposition. The state gives the young man a professional start, and in return he gets a trained reservist, who can be called in a crisis.
It is worth noting immediately that this kind of training is not intended to prepare a frontline soldier. Rather, it is about building a backroom, that is, people who will keep the state in action in the event of a conflict. The modern war is not a clash of infantry alone. Behind the soldiers fighting on the front line stands extended facilities: logistics, medics, mechanics, communications operators, drivers, IT specialists and civilian defense.
Continue reading: ]]>10 challenges for Poland for the next decade Part 3]]>
]]>Free conference for investors - don't miss!]]>
Author: ]]>Bartosz Beerko]]>
