Mr Marcin Romanowski has just received the so-called. Iron letter which simply means that alternatively of keeping him in mining custody with the hope that he will yet "break" and start blaming the people of the PiS line itself until the conviction he will stay at large. And that will require the burgundy D.A.'s office to get their own evidence.
PLet us skip the charges against the application of this warrant of freedom to the accused institution.
Rather, let us look at what Waldemar Żurek writes on the X portal, cast by Tusk as Minister of Justice and, at the same time, lawyer General. I remind you that he is not a man from any social lowland, but a erstwhile typical of the “extraordinary caste” for which 1 would anticipate more than from any typical of a hateful group of strong-in-buy.
In an entry published present on the portal X Żurek writes, full of outrage:
‘There is no impunity and no impunity for the people of Zbigniew Ziobry. The Prosecutor's Office will make a decision to issue an iron letter for Marcin Romanowski."
According to a erstwhile justice of the Krakow territory Court, Mr Waldemar Żurek's lawthe application of a preventive measurement is in itself a penalty. However, in no case is it, but, in accordance with Article 249 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, it is only to safeguard the appropriate conduct of proceedings. Only exceptionally can it be a means to prevent a fishy from committing another crime.
Meanwhile, according to Lurk (I'm going for a bet that's the gist of words heard from his chief) A temporary arrest is simply a punishment.
Furthermore, Żurek is highly reprehensively spreading the message that Mr Romanowski should always be in the Transnistria.
Z Minister Żurek's entry on X involves another.
Since the erstwhile justice states that the deficiency of application to Marcin Romanowski of the strictest preventive measurement will consequence in this 1 being impunityless, it means that he realises that the allegations announced with a bang are actually a pound of wafers not worth it. And if it comes to trial, then the burgundy-ass prosecutor's office will endure a terrible defeat.
Hence, the announcement of further steps of the burrowing neoprosecution seems logical. The complaint will prolong the proceedings. utilizing the method of linguistic interpretation, Article 281(2) Kpk theoretically indicates an obstacle to the issuing of an iron letter in the form of opposition by the prosecutor.
§ 2. In the preparation procedure, an iron letter may be issued at the request of the prosecutor or in the absence of his opposition.
Not exactly, gentlemen.
If the request for an iron letter comes from the suspect or his lawyer, the prosecutor shall have the right to object which does not bind the court. The amended provision of Article 281(2) of the NCPs must be interpreted utilizing the rules of systemic interpretation. It should be assumed that the authority taking the decision on the Iron Letter is the court and that the parties concerned, i.e. the suspect and the prosecutor have the same powers and legal means to defend their own position and fight the opponent’s position. The opposition of the prosecutor so reflects the negative assessment of the defendant's application and the request that the court disregards the application and does not issue an iron letter. In favour of the primacy of strategy interpretation, including the pro-constitutional provision in question, SA in Gdańsk expressed the view that the systemic and functional explanation of Article 281(2) of the NCPs leads to the conclusion that a territory court examining a suspect's application for an iron letter in the preparatory proceedings is not bound by the prosecutor's opposition (post. SA in Gdańsk dated 29.3.2022, II AKz 222/22/22).
For: Code of Criminal Procedure. Comment, ed. prof. dr hab. Jerzy Skorupka (2026)
What will the Court of Appeal do and, above all, when? due to the fact that in order to challenge today's decision, first, you would gotta draw up its justification...
One is 100% sure. The process in which Mr Romanowski would appear as accused will not begin before next year's elections. Romanowski could respond publically to the charges, and this in turn would seriously exposure their smallness.
Therefore, no of the processes so loudly announced by Tusk before 15 October 2023 and besides during the first months of his reign by compromise 13 December It hasn't started yet. No, even the indictments have not been formulated!
It is more and more clear that we are dealing with a political hucpaa dressed in a toga.
30.09 2026
