Zorro and Robin Hood

Zor­ro is an anarcho-capitalist with a spade. Its first is simply a natural, not state codex. Inter­tures erstwhile officials are looting people erstwhile the power crosses the sound of freedom. Worked on this, without engagement and stamp. Robin Hood besides fought with a week. But his message is rhubarb. He took 1 to give the second, breaking the regulation of non-agreement, the foundation of all the creative freedom. He was an anarcho-chist, but not a capitalist.

Zor­ro

This anarcho-capitalist. Anarchocaptali­tion is based on 2 key elements: non-agreement and smo­cation, which leads to the freedom of all social networks. Zor­ro inter­tives erstwhile the politician or local officials are instigating and violating the local population. Guns wash 1 of their lands, their crops, their earnings – a non-existent conservation agency.

It does not apply to the state court, the back works erstwhile the state breaks ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­. Zoróro does not work with any authoritative love. Its sprawl and lasso can be utilized in the field of primary protection and management of constriction. It does not consider the end of the state's apa­r­r­r­or apar­r­r­or. For him, the office of politician is the consequence of the co-operation of the losses of the legithism to the opposition of displacement.

In the leader of the Zor­rórólólólóre, thieves frequently recover and take them away. Don Die­go de la Ve­ga (the civilian alterl Zor­ro), lives in the cut, behind the facade of aristocratic passiveness. erstwhile non-industry has its own activities, it is possible to deal with society in a way that is compatible with society – it is not a criminal practice. The central price of power and biurocracy is based on the subsidiarity: the improvement of the origins, with a unique mini-min­cation of the power.

The Zoróro is not a back-breaking country for violence, but primarily for all rights of one. . . . . . . This is what makes him an anarcho-capist.

Robin Hood

Robin gathered the December “Joint companies«created by the parenting of an alter­tive society, which was formerly ruled by a tightened society. It is in a certain sense close to the current courts or protection. 1 bandytism: deficiency of transparency, deficiency of formal regulations or contrak­tions – this is more of a gang than a critical marketplace instinct.

Robin Hood to anar­chista, but not an anarcho-captive. Clearly, the usage of government power was out of control and, in its own Narrifice, it was against the natural laws of poverty. No little than 1 of the methods (republic, forced redistribution, initiation of power) are in contradiction with the non-connection of the anarcho-capitalism with non-agreementality.

Robin Hood is simply a classy Annar-chist: mocking the state, rolling with the tyrannium, is firmly oppressed – but this is not done by free marketplace contrak­tions or good judgment, but by bandy redistribution. For this reason, it was more left-wing than a model for the defence of the market.

Similarly,

Robin Hood stood in opposition to the Sherif of Nottingham and the State's Peace Apparatus. Therefore, it can be said that he lived with a possible number of local authorities, and that he was able to measurement the flow of water on a sedated basis, as were the active conservation agencies in anarcho-capitalists. All their activities were overriding. Initiation of the movementy (fiction, regulation). Navet, if the intent was to punish the guilty, it was inactive a good, forceful pain, contrary to the pure explanation of the regulation of nonagreement. In addition, Zorro did not bargain from the fact that 1 of the gods, but always inter­r­­­cation, was behind where it happened. lack of knowledge.

Zorór was convinced that they would give back what they stole, frequently quietly and without power. Robin Hood – beginning up robs visitors and nobles to give poverty. It's a classy force. redistributionnot the free marketplace of philanthropy. Although it may have been utilized by the locals by means of dates, 1 of the main figures is crime. The Anarcho-Capitals recognise only voluntary support – due to the fact that they give the power to break under the tens of years. engagement in the defence of force was voluntary — and so was Zor­ro, than erstwhile did not initiate the force, it has always been there where it has already reached it.

Robin Hood is simply a quinte­sence left, Zor­ro The original. Robin Hood completed the redistribution, Zorro re-established the message. It is the back of the rebel group that stands on social networks.

Both were aristocrats. . . . . . Zorro was willing to support and reconstruct the station. He did not usage the title for a hug, but for a protective wash of natural origin. He pretended to be a dekactor to defend people from the country, which was taught by the Aristocracy to plunder. Don Die­go de la Ve­ga pretended to be weak in order to be able to act effectively — his mask hid no shame, but virtue.

Robin Hood was besides from the household noble, but he lost all — not the back of the stuff, but besides the ethos. His rebellion was not a continuation of virtue, but a reaction to the failure of privilege. He fought not to reconstruct the flow, but to reconstruct the old supply. Zor­rog with tyrannium, Robin with los. Zor­ro was a region of its own motion, Ro­bin – a region of its own curve.

The Aristo­cation of Zor­ra is nobilitas animi, the aristocracy is Resentivity in green kubra.

Grzegorz GPS Swiderski
]]>https://t.me/CanalBlogeraGPS]]>
]]>https://Twitter.com/gps65]]>