The EU's ReArm Europe programme announced by Ursula von der Leyen does not aim to build the European Union's defence potential. Rather, it is about saving the EU's elites after the Green Deal's disgrace – says Tomasz Wróblewski, head of the Warsaw Enterprise Institute.
Tomasz Wróblewski's programme published on the "Freedom in Remont" channel states that the remilitarisation of Europe announced by Ursula von der Leyen is not intended to build safety in the region. The "ReArm Europe" programme would de facto service the EU's elite to save this task "and its amorphous democracy of elite stature".
– ReArm is something fresh on the EU repair firm. Firstly, it recognises militarism as an crucial component of Europe's peaceful architecture, and secondly, it is driven by the fear of the marginalisation of the elites of the Union, which are disregarded from Trump and the increasing anti-establishment movement throughout Europe. It's a task born of panic that the Trump revolution will spill across Europe. And it is this nervousness that makes ReArm even for an EU task that is full of contradictory and logical holes – says Tomasz Wróblewski.
The president of the Warsaw Enterprise Institute draws attention to the serious shortcomings of the overall plan to increase the military capacity of the European Union. It points out that Brussels is presently talking about creating a common European army, but there is inactive no thought where to get military candidates who want to service in the army. It adds that the EU has plans to make its own defence systems, but we do not even have the right industrial base to do so.
"But as in the Green Łada, the European Commission's actions were more crucial than the climate, so in ReArm, it is not just about the arms process itself. Creating regulations, fresh EU institutions, for movement. It is not about tanks and rockets, it is about power," says Tomasz Wróblewski on the "Freedom in Remont" channel.
He then adds that the ReArm Europe programme is crucial to the European Commission. "Fills the gap after the compromised Green Order. Officials realized that it was easier to scare us with reports of Russian military concentration than a climate disaster in 100 years. It is easier to explain what we request weapons for than this full arsenal of useless net zero technology," the expert explains.
Wróblewski notes that the same Euro-enthusiasts who, until recently, fought to defend the Green Deal stressing the request for climate sacrifices in the name of the planet's defence, present talk about building defence potential. The president of the Warsaw Enterprise Institute reminds us that the defence manufacture is not ecological, yet the Green Deal supporters worship it. “The same phrases, the same narrative, only a fresh object of EU worship”, he adds.
Source: basins.pl, YouTube
WMa
