On 8 January in the Sejm the first reading of the government's draft Act on the amendment of the Act on granting protection to foreigners in the territory of Poland took place, print 924. The majority of the parliament's task likes it. On 9 January, 408 Members voted to send the draft for further work. 26 Members opposed, 1 abstained.
Mr Zimoch from Poland 2050 believes, for example, that he combines care for the safety of the border with humanitarianism, as they are identified in the group's task peculiarly sensitive.
But why are there no children among these susceptible groups, only “unattended children”? “Children are frequently utilized to cross the border and destabilize the country,” explains Minister Duszczyk. Yet, it would seem that children who are suspected of being utilized by adults request peculiar protection. Sorry, Jizas, Maria and Joseph, if they want to save you, they'll gotta let you go on a raft after the Bug. Like Moses himself.
There were more outstanding statements by Minister Duszczyk, for example: “Our proposal does not pose any risks of human rights being restricted. We are only talking about time, territorial and proportional restrictions on migrants' rights, without limiting the rights of Poles surviving in Poland at the time." Because, you know, only Poles have rights. Yet.
And the absolute winner, pay attention, for here is the fullness of the minister’s message in the first syntax: “The migrant is simply a individual who is being utilized is being treated as a surviving shield. So if we want to cross the border, we're shutting it down right now. So that there is no anticipation of crossing the border, due to the fact that we do not then recognise, suspending this right to asylum, that anyone has crossed the border. So there is no rule of non-refoulment or ban on turning around, due to the fact that we consider that this individual simply did not cross the border in any way. It cannot be invoked as a consequence of this suspension of the law, but we are talking about the fact that this individual has not crossed the border, in fact he has crossed the border inadvertently, so he must return to the country from which he returned. This is the idea, this 1 (here the minister hesitated, seemingly not knowing how to bypass the word "fake"? – see the car.) this thought in this bill, which is compatible with global law due to the fact that it assumes a temporary, territorial and proportional suspension of the right to submit applications. But listen, you can't enter the territory in this situation either, due to the fact that the only anticipation of law that would make it possible for individual to trust on the right to asylum. There is no asylum, you cannot enter, you return to the country from which you came."
Are we clear? Yes Minister Duszczyk translated in the Sejm (10 hour, 5 minute sitting) the thought and basis of the law suspending the right to asylum.
By the way, Minister Duszczyk has eliminated our border. According to the Minister's statement, since there is no asylum, no 1 crosses the border due to the fact that he could only cross on the basis of asylum. And since no 1 crosses, there's no pushbacks due to the fact that there's no 1 to send across the border. So the border itself, as it turns out, is gone
That's how the bar barrier and the concertin are built. An absurd barrier, from a concept that can neither be explained logically nor legally justified.
Instrumentalisation
Why has it not occurred to anyone that beginning border crossings, enabling people to apply for asylum at transitions and improving visa policy is an easier and lawful way to combat illegal migration?
Article 1 of the bill, which introduces a fresh term, "instrumentalisation", seems to be the answer. It is he who allows the right to global protection to persons of any sex and age.
‘Instrumentalisation — conduct by a country bordering the Republic of Poland or another entity of activities aimed at allowing foreigners to exceed the rules of external border law within the meaning of Article 2(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/399 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 March 2016 on an EU Code of Principles governing the movement of persons across borders (Schengen Borders Code) (OJ L 77, 23.03.2016, p. 1, as amended1)), in peculiar with the usage of force against officers protecting that border or in conjunction with the demolition of border infrastructure likely to consequence in destabilisation of interior situation in the territory of the Republic of Poland,’ says the draft.
This instrumentalization Poland gives up willingly. Belarus can instrumentalize, so can we. Thanks to instrumentalisation, we can build a populist migration strategy that is intended to satisfy Polish racists and xenophobics, we can force additional money on the EU to defend borders, we can organize a "polygon", we can spend quite a few money on the shield of the East, or, as the Siegeni people say – Wała Tuska, we can displace, restrict civilian rights, distract from how the state services deal with another acts directed against Poland in the framework of the hybrid war, and above all we can keep political will above the law.
The MP Urszula Nowogorska of the PSL assured that at the beginning the border was crossed by women, children and aged people, now these are groups of young men with criminal background trained by Belarusians. "These people cannot be returned to the country of origin, due to the fact that there is simply a war in these countries. I mean Sudan, Yemen, Afghanistan, Somalia. Nor can they be returned to Belarus due to the fact that it has made an global readmission agreement," said the MP. So the worse people get to cross the border, the worse they get. If you can't deport them, you gotta push them out.
The Confederate Members lacked only a paragraph in the Act on activists whose organizations would have liked to have banned. In addition, they were satisfied that after years KO yet spoke the language of the Confederacy.
Members agreed that citizens' safety was the most crucial thing for them. Only that they are not migrants who go across the Polish-Belarusian border are at the minute a threat to Polish citizens, but uniforms who abuse alcohol at the border, speeding cars with unacceptable velocity on local roads, causing accidents, shooting at random civilians with a gun.
Drivers who – According to the police – in 2024 they injured 24,825 people and killed 1881 people. Are drivers' rights so restricted? Nope. There is not even a request for an entrepreneur hiring a driver to check whether he has a valid driving licence.
Only the Left declared that it would not support this bill due to the fact that it could not be repaired. Thank you. Katarzyna Uberhan said: "In this debate, we decided to put our own constitution in a drawer, lock and lose the key to it."
Podlasie Border defender Division He recorded a Christmas carol for all of us.. It's a phase of national schizophrenia I don't understand. Minister Duszczyk, if he wants his migration strategy to stick to the point he should immediately, along with the right to asylum, suspend the right to sing carols. Songs about how happy it is that immigrants illegally go with their kid to the town and destabilize the quiet peace of its inhabitants, who then gotta endure and shepherds and 3 kings, and yet find out that somewhere else Herod slaughters the innocent? It is encouraging foreigners to migrate, and Poles to humanitarianism, for which in Poland they are dragged after courts.
The carol should definitely not be sung. Unless specified a joint, critical, redactive one, with a dedication to Minister Duszczyk and 408 MPs who yet supported the project:
Oh, Malutski, Malutski, Malutski, as a glove
Why did you come to us through the woods? You tried to screw us!
"Speak and fight him
It won't.
Asylum
"Speak and fight him
♪ 'Cause you're here ♪
Solu
