From time to time, all publicist must check the tolerance of the editor-in-chief in whose writing he publishes, what I intend to do at this point. If you read this text on the pages “NCz!”, then the Chief passed the tolerance test!
What is it? Well, Peter Heszen of the Crown challenged the doctrine of a free marketplace as a panacea for any pain, in addition claiming that an excess marketplace could lead to its inverse, or socialism. nevertheless I advocate the free market, I am not a dogma in this substance but a pragmatist. Therefore, I see that the free marketplace in Poland has become a fetish in right-wing environments, influenced by JKM's long-standing missionary activity. His faults are not noticed, which is so unusual that the right has always talked about the contamination of man by first sin (in the language of theology) or cognitive, intellectual, and destructive limitations of passion (in the language of philosophy). No strategy created by man is and cannot be perfect, and even if it is developed perfectly conceptually, in practice something will always be defective. The explanation of inherent human imperfection shows that the weakness of all strategy is the alleged human factor. Unfortunately, this rule besides applies to the free market.
Of course, if we take into account economical data alone, specified as GDP growth, we will shortly see that the free marketplace is the most effective for overall growth. However, if we take into account the alleged Gini index, which is the distribution of wealth growth, it may turn out that the number has become very rich, any people live at the same level, and any of the standard of surviving has fallen. Finally, in Scotland, separatism became a major force as a consequence of the Tacherist reforms, erstwhile the erstwhile mediate class was spaupted in favour of English corporations and their employees. There are elements in the free marketplace that I find objectively wrong. The marketing of everything leads to the promotion of selfishness and the birth of consumerism, where a man believes that his social position is simply a derivative of consumption and income, where everything can be bought and sold. I erstwhile watched a French movie about a juvenile prostitute who initially had moral opposition to paid sex. Her first client rapidly and efficiently expounded her free marketplace rules, explaining, “You have a body and I have money, so we can make a trade”. Saying a small mean and a small witty, even JKM himself has not so simply pointed out in any column the thought of price as a place where request meets supply! And to be serious: in a clean free market, where all relationships are made, there is no point from which 1 could attack prostitution, pornography, etc. He's a customer, he's a salesman and a commodity. Anyone who, apart from expressing reprimand and disgust, would like to ban specified a business would become a “socialist”.
The same is actual of consumerism, from which all the criticism we have criticized, vokeism, primitive feminism, and the claimfulness of the "Z" generation. As a consequence of economical growth since the mid-sixties of the last century – in Poland due to communism with a 30-year hold – young people turned to a acquainted place. They do not want and do not know how to work due to the fact that luxury and consumption are considered to be an component of “human rights”. Paradoxically, the free marketplace in which their parents worked so hard for the welfare of their parents did not teach them a culture of work and saving, but of consumption, where everyone deserves everything and where everyone can be what they want: a man, a woman, a “activist”, a “person figure” or 1 of the next 126 sexes. First, the free marketplace has destroyed the foundations of conventional value and culture, along with them the foundations of conventional working and saving culture. Bankers promoted consumerism to drive borrowers to bank windows, and producers of crap and objectively unnecessary services to trigger an artificial request to buy. increasing out of the desire to increase the marketplace supply, advertising has made an absolute demolition of the rationality of a man operating under marketplace conditions, destroying the intellectual foundation of homo economicus.
The liberals do not see that the unfettered marketplace leads to the monopolization of the economy by large corporations at the expense of household and medium-sized companies. It is not the state, but the marketplace has led to the dominance of crypto-monopolists, as all social media user sees erstwhile his statements are censored and accounts deleted for preaching ideas that quasi-monopolist does not accept. More, all the lamented side effects of the free marketplace are explained by the deficiency of a free marketplace that has not yet reached its perfection. And supposedly, as shortly as 1 day (never) reaches it, all the problems will evaporate themselves, like a camphor.
The fact is that the free market, in order to operate, must be under the control of the State (national interest) and the laws (e.g. antitrust legislation) and be limited by ethics. Contrary to what his extremist supporters say, the free marketplace does not come from itself, but is the creation of the state! It is an highly delicate structure, which, on the 1 hand, is threatened by the overgrowth of the state ("socialism") and, on the another hand, by the large corporations. The second besides advance peculiarly powerfully consumerism, which results in the breakdown of social ties and socialism.
When we look at anti-system parties in western Europe, they are not peculiarly free-market due to the fact that they have long been converted to what the free marketplace leads to without restrictions. Neoliberalism leads straight to globalism. erstwhile I enter physically or online the French right-wing bookstores, there are no Hayeks, Mises, and libertarians. If there are books about them, then in the category of hostile ideologies that contradict the nation, the national state, the community, religion and morality.
I leave these considerations to my mind.
Adam Wielomski