The Center for European improvement (CER), an influential think tank based in London, Brussels and Berlin, points out that in this year's elections to the European Parliament, Europeans must choose multiculturalism or stagnation. If Europeans want prosperity they must renounce national values, increase the influx of migrants and make a multiethnic society. Another decision means labour shortages and higher taxes – scares analyst John Springford.
Think tank gani of the "radical right" action, which "probably" will gain many seats in June elections to the European Parliament. It indicates that the "great replacement" explanation will gain greater importance. It says that "liberal elites advance immigration from outside Europe to undermine cultural and cultural homogeneity".
CER does not like the rhetoric of many centre-right politicians who, in fear of losing their mandates, "have decided to accept the assumptions of this civilizational rhetoric alternatively than face it".
And so the head of the European Commission applying for another term, Ursula von der Leyen has appointed in the EC “a Vice-President for the Promotion of European Lifestyle” to delight voters who argue the negative effects of migration. In France, the leaders of the centre-right Republican organization condemned mass immigration, and the German chadeces in their fresh programme published last December stated that "all who want to live here must admit our dominant culture without any objections". British Conservatives are holding asylum seekers hoping to be deported to Rwanda.
"The applicable problem of turning to the nationalist right is that Europe is ageing rapidly, and less immigrant taxpayers mean higher taxes on workers paying for pensions, wellness care and another public services for the elderly. This is well known but little understandable as to the degree to which the free movement of people in Europe and higher employment rates will aid alleviate labour shortages", says the CER website.
Think tank calls on mainstream politicians to face the "nationalist" parties, stressing that migration from outside the continent is essential to keep the working age population stable.
Migration is intended to benefit European countries, migrants and countries to which visitors send remittances.
CERs point out that due to convergence of surviving standards, the free movement of people from poorer EU countries has decreased significantly, allowing richer countries to increase production and finance public services, the pensions of their citizens. Employers are now "forced" to draw inexpensive labour from outside Europe.
When presenting data from fresh years, think tank shows that there has been a clear slowdown in the employment of EU citizens from 1 associate State to another since 2016. A one-time slight increase of 200,000 was observed in 2019. The pay gap between the fresh and older associate States has fallen, and in the close future these differences will proceed to be bridged, as long as forecasts for comparatively fast growth in Central and east Europe are proven.
A large number of confederate residents left Europe in search of work following the 2008 crisis. Currently, no central bank is able to control the economical cycle and it seems improbable to repeat the "auto-destructive policy of the European Central Bank in 2010-2012" (raising interest rates in 2010 and 2011, refusing to support public debt). This policy was to lead to deflation and an increase in unemployment. As a result, many young people from confederate Europe have emigrated.
CER suggests that Ukraine's accession to the EU could stimulate migration, but accession to Ukraine before 2030 is unlikely. For first you must win the war. North-west Europe must so urgently bring migrants from outside the continent.
It is noted that it is hard for Europeans to work harder and longer. Even if this were to happen, it is improbable that it will be adequate to balance the effects of the ageing population. Many European countries have already announced that they will rise their retirement age in the future.
In the opinion of the tank, "most centreleft and centreright politicians recognise that immigration is needed to alleviate demographic pressure". Therefore, the drastic tightening of asylum rules present is intended to supply "only a political cover for bringing more people into regular immigration". For example, Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, although officially holding an anti-immigration position, has increased the number of work permits for non-EU abroad workers.
Therefore, in the opinion of the CER, there is no reason to question the "mainstream consensus" on immigration. "In the future, Europe will become little white and more multicultural if the right can't reduce immigration from outside the continent. This represents a serious political dilemma for mainstream politicians: centre-rights and centre-lefts. They can challenge nationalists by asking hard questions about labour shortages, the taxation burden on people of working age and the quality of wellness care systems and care for older people in the absence of higher immigration rates from countries outside Europe.
They can besides effort to borrow nationalist rhetoric, but hazard being overtaken by them, as was the case during the elections in Italy, the Netherlands and France. Those of us who welcome the economical and cultural vigor that immigrants bring should hope that mainstream politicians will find any courage" – says the European improvement Centre.
It is not known from now on that a large number of young people, at working age, is 1 of the fundamental factors affecting the welfare of a country. Therefore, the rulers should not only advance abortion, but besides sex politics, affirming various sexual deviations that hit matrimony and family.
Source: cer.eu
AS
Britain wants to limit legal immigration. Home Minister presented the plan
