Some people, including day-to-day journalists, do not want to admit themselves to being hungry. What about God, is he silent too? Does he wash his hands again erstwhile he's out? (God's away, God's away, God's distant on business, business). Well, no! God gives us a very clear signal, we should be able to read it! In addition, you can see the map with forecast of weather on Sunday 18 May 2025. It will be in the centre and at the end of Poland, and there will be little fresco. How is this going to work? This explains:
I believe that they should go to the rear, which will make a lower entry. If you don't have a problem with that, it's better not to.
Here are the seemingly localized plants:
1⃣ The human race has no effect.
2⃣ Chances that my voice will change the output, which is missing.
3⃣ speaks quite a few effort.
➡️ sek: I'm not starving.
✅ Hidden assumptions: others operate. This suggests that there is simply a unchangeable mass that will besides go to the graves, so my voice in it will follow the evaluation.
But...
✅ If any thinkers are able to scope this sime, they will all resign.
The consequence is: no voters, no voice, no mandate.
➡️ It is simply a classical example of the regrecation of the consumption of strategiums, akin to: the bond, the paradex of the community of the animal or the branch effect. They only know what's going on.
➡️ Therefore, we gotta deal with the phenomenon of the two-fold potential!
The value behind it leads to absorption:
1⃣. If everyone is like me, then everyone is.
2⃣. If all of them resign, my vote abruptly becomes important.
3⃣. And if my vote can be taken, it is worth going.
➡️ Thus: the consequence that is to dispel me, that is not worth the effort, leads to an up-to-date vote.
The fact that your vote prevailed is that it has the other proportion to the first number. Only the little people are talking, the more your voice feeds weight. Therefore, it becomes more and more effective, the more people consider it to be ineffective.
!! It's an auction of effectiveness!!!
➡️ They said: "Indeterminateness" is simply a function of more activeness, not an optional feature.
It's not just a test of grain, but a foundation of community life:
1⃣. If all others halt paying taxes, why would you pay?
2⃣. If all others halt segregating the garbage, why would you do it?
3⃣. If all the others will halt proliferating, why would you bother?
This is the difference – as in "racial" – in practice, it is the most lethal!
✅ The more people consider the vote to be a waste, the more they pay to vote — due to the fact that your voice becomes decisive.
!? Do you care? You're trapped again!
✅ From the point of view of the explanation of the decication 1 — with a given stand of the planet — the reason for the decline of the fresco has no meaning!
✅ Your rights were deciated, depending on the number of actualists, not their movements.
Independently or indirectly:
1⃣. They do not talk out of the power of the calculus.
2⃣. Is it due to the fact that it rains.
3⃣. Are they apathetic, drunk, or windy in flat earth.
➡️ The static effect is the same: the decrease in frequency increases weight in the off-balance.
🌆 A concrete example: you don't request love to pull your man into the balance. 300 is enough. Sometime less, if the remainder considered that they were.
So why is he talking about "racial voters"? Bo:
1⃣. Model "racial failure" is utilized to show the effects of local and pardocs.
2⃣. inactive an analytic tool, not a viable opinion of the masses.
3⃣. It is expected to show that if all of them were de-calculative, the democracies would be inept – which would exposure the tension between the one-stop-shop and the interior system.
➡️ In fact, the applicable effect of low frequencies does not depend on whether people are dying from hunger from the plant or from the forest.
❗️ Thus, the more serious thesis is: “The little people are talking, the more unchangeable your head grows.”
🌩 1 of these is the fact that the majority of people are not able in the dream of deciding. due to the fact that if it were, the fresco would be almost even, and all the reprehensibility would fall like a card. Is democracy afraid that:
1⃣ is simply a ‘irrational’ (e.g. in the sense of duty, tradition, momentum),
The 2 components of the strategy are "soundly" in social function.
❕ Finally, the final conclusion is that you can go to sleep. You're trapped again!
➡️ In the case of liberal-demotional decication, it is naive that: "The biodecications of the large number of individuals in the process of headquartering, though 1 of the errors, are approaching the applicable optimum"
But that's illustrious, due to the fact that it's working in the back erstwhile it's very rigid:
1Indicated decisions are independent,
2. The hazard of success is somewhat > 50%,
3. The strategy captures good decisions and eliminates bad ones.
In the real world, no of these feuds!
❓ Why is it that the “seditions” are out of office?
❗️ “Optymal decication is not a means of error.”
💉 Example: 1 doctor knows that a patient needs an amputee. 9 laymen think there's adequate aspirin. Democracy: a mediate decision is – not a larger dose of aspirin.
➡️ Effect? The patient is able, due to the fact that the decision is determined by the majority of the non-compartment and the expert is overridden.
❓ Why does the demotion of the strategy spoil the quality of the decision?
✅ The decisions are not made by those who will be liable for them. There are no negligible selections: the depth of the decisions are seldom censical (no 1 loses their own money). There is simply a joint pot syndrome – people are looking to get something “for themselves” without caring about the full (Theory of the populist Borough).
➡️ As a result: democracy does not lead to a common goal, but to a mid-term compromise between the demands of the social groups!
!️temtemtemtemtemtemtemtemtemtemtem️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️!!!️️️️️️️️️!!️️️️️!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!️️️️️️️!!!!!️️️️️!️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️!️️️️️️️️️️️️S️️!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
✅ It is more likely that each of them will operate optimally. This is the thought of Hayek's spontaneous order, of Locek's contractualism and the practicality of Mises.
In this context:
The decision is determined by 1 decision, which will have the effect of its action.
2⃣ does not lead to a remedy for errors, but each survey has its own assessment in practice.
3 ⃣ Mistakes and corretives (market, competitiveness, sustainability).
✅ Democracy is simply a false, technological mojo: it is neither legal nor cooperative, but it is simply a compromise between ignorance. It does not give wisdom.
✅ The results of the decentralization and of the alleged ‘renewal’ lead to the re-active efficiency of the system, as it takes care of vowel costs, local informacation and con-rectorial mechanics.
✅ It is not based on the fact that the decision is driven by the crowd, but that each of them will have its own consecations. Democracy has thought the arithmetic of ethics and compromise with wisdom.
!? Have you already heard what you want? If not, it means that you should not be starving.
Grzegorz GPS Swiderski
]]>https://t.me/CanalBlogeraGPS]]>
]]>https://Twitter.com/gps65]]>
