This short text I decided to start somewhat ironically with the paraphrase of the popular memu in which the words "who are we?", "what do we want?", "when do we want it?" The meme itself is simply a humorous version of the indecisiveness of different social groups, but the subject I would like to address briefly is no longer 1 of these. In the face of our challenges, it is deadly serious.
Answering the question posed in the introduction, let us repeat within our own conscience, in reflection of our hierarchy of ideas and values these 3 simple (rhetorical?!) questions. But exactly, can we inactive answer these questions without hesitation? Isn't this kind of conscience check a grudge against us?
Today we stand at the threshold of the storm times, about which Jan Mosdorf wrote in the “Stage”. If we have adequate humility, we can repeat that We do not yet have a full answer to all the questions we ask ourselves, we know that our shortcomings are more easy met And now most importantly, are we far from political unrest? Can we connect cool thought with hot water? Or has this disorder become our main tool? The art we do in our own closed circle? I will not give here ready answers to these and further questions, due to the fact that I myself must ask and consider them in my own conscience whether I can yet answer them, whether the convenience of modern life that this planet offers us killed the perfect in me, or not to mislead him and false illusions of what we erstwhile called the thought that ignites our souls.
We have many ways of doing things in front of us - we can close ourselves to our own memories, erstwhile we were sunk in the 1990s and early 2000s by sacrificing our own funds, leisure time and time spent with friends to just pass on what we believe in the vast masses of society. There was no net at the time, no phones, no social media, and the only recipients of our action were at best respective people or often...no one. But was anyone interested? Did that halt us from acting? Nope. The only constant spectators of our actions were observing the preparations of our parents or the fewer of our friends, and the reward of simple words - "good work". Markers, paints, sprays, tens of meters of material, stickers, posters or jointly organized events and celebrations which we sometimes look at with a lenient grin were for us a lifetime. But it was inactive ours. Life and its stages are known to verify our actions. As nationalists, we have established hierarchy and priorities, including religion in God- spiritual development, the establishment of a household and its improvement and happiness. By the way, these are paradoxically revolutionary methods that are alien to this world. However, we may boldly repeat that the household is the basis of a strong and conscious nation for which we are committed to surviving and working. The sacrifice of it is 1 of the stages in the life of all nationalist, as crucial as the fresh street or public activity, which can besides be continued within the scope of the possibility.
We can besides close ourselves in our own environment, offending others and creating a closed ellipse of people treating everyone as competition. This is destructive due to the fact that it leads to interior destruction. Do we not remember the words of John Mosdorf- You can walk with us shoulder to shoulder and be certain that no one, who is simply a righteous Pole, will reject, nor will we mistrust? We are not organization players who will compete for the number of “devils” or “accession” just so that my message is “most expensive”.
The last of the blind streets is to close ourselves in the Farise dogma and the way of the right-wing "colored birds" which, theoretically and deliberalize on ideological topics, but which do not bring into motion, will be a discussion club which slow (at first unnoticeably) will begin to match a nationalist bohemian, operating on antipodes of social life. frequently the discussion of 1 or 2 points resembles the old Testament debates that led to the creation of absurd laws and orders.
In all this, in order not to lose your head and not get caught on 1 peculiar road, we should be able to draw on each possibility. The foundation is the past, the first of the apparent traps described by me. On the 1 hand, we must draw from the past that formed us, from reading, music and activities from which we cannot cut off, but we must not treat this as a pattern which is unreflectively copied for modern activity. We must besides draw strength and pride from belonging to our own organization, but besides in a healthy way, taking care of its strength and development, but not to close ourselves to a related and fraternal organization to which we, as conscious nationalists, should each time extend a helping hand, supporting each other. yet drawing from the vault of ideas- We gotta make a way to be imitated by others. Here's our thought possessivity. (Jan Korolec).We cannot copy on a scale of 1:1 but evolve to update the thought without cutting off at the same time from the roots.
Man is free in the interior life of his personality, as long as he can foretell his own actions and if he has grounds to justice his own actions (Bolesław Piasecki). In this rift around us, let us learn quickly...but with reason and humility. Let us remember that especially now we are the narrators and narrators of ideas, so let us do this with reasonableness - let us convey it responsibly. Let us be alien to the confusion, unnecessary nerves and the desire for blind retaliation, which does not lead to anything creative, and sometimes as Roman Dmowski wrote about it to lose creative thinking. However applicable politicians do not realize it, nevertheless it seems to them to be idealism, deficiency of soberness, we will stay on our way. Those of our friends who are impatient, let them think more profoundly about our tasks, those opponents who fear our competition for tickets and positions, let them calm down. We're in no hurry. (Roman Dmowski).
‘Who are we?"; “What do we want?”; “when do we want it?”
Bartosz Tomczak
