The democracy that we know, or alternatively the 1 that everyone in Poland has dreamed about in fresh years, wanted to adapt it to European-liberal standards, before our eyes it went to its higher form. The times of the pandemic and the confusion behind our east border have greatly accelerated processes that in earlier years simply could not make on specified a scale. All the signs in the sky besides indicate that this device is just speeding up, and after fresh events we can anticipate many surprises.
Intolerance as the highest manifestation of liberalism.
By observing the phenomena surrounding, it can be said that they were trending a fewer years ago, the tolerance crusade was importantly hampered in favour of a fresh communicative coined by apologists of globalism, namely, unrighteousness. As I mentioned, the improvement of events has importantly accelerated the pandemic, erstwhile only their "experts" could be trusted, and there could not be any speech about deviations from the line's media and politicians. It seems, however, that it is only now for good that we are dealing with a full developing propaganda device that has already eliminated all erstwhile objections to, at least, keep any appearance of democracy. Thus we have reached a time erstwhile freedom is defined as coercion, and on our own skin we can feel what disloyalty results from its followers.
Today, it is hard to prove what, at least a fewer years ago, human rights activists, LGBTQWERTY, and various kinds of morals extremists tried to fight for, and what was commonly called tolerance. Of course, individual can say that from the very beginning the so-promoted "tolerance" acted solely unilaterally, and its supporters were incapable to accept the pluralism of the worldview of those who did not support their fictitious imagination of the world. Full consent, the point, however, was that at that time specified an "intolerant" individual could at most be slandered with impunity and put on a suitable patch for the occasion – fascist, anti-semite, communist, homophobic and so on. present things are completely different, and all these "unrighteous" people are already deprived of their positions, threatened and savored, and, above all, oppressed. Of course, all in the name of the liberal paradigm of freedom. Thus, the words of prof. Alexander Dugin, so hated by any in Poland, who had already shown a fewer good years ago, are fulfilled, that at the time of the defeat of earlier totalitarianism by neoliberalism, the same has evolved into only an existing model of the improvement of societies, which, as time passed, "democratic" will increasingly not tolerate any deviations from the standards established by it.
Another thing is that even a fewer years ago, everything and everyone that we associate with the widely understood liberal left was widely regarded as representatives and mouths of Western interests in Poland. Of course, as far as the environment is concerned, nothing has changed. However, erstwhile we look at the another side of the political axis, we see that present things are completely different than a fewer years ago. An example of Prime Minister Mateusz Morawiecki clutching with Juwal Noach Harari, president Andrzej Duda for his spending in Davos, the engagement of any Confederate MPs in the communicative imposed by pharmaceutical companies and the EU and the most fresh "pragmatism" of the national environment show that there have been much greater changes than anyone could have expected.
Nationals at the service of globalists?
When we look at the current abuses of the System, the environment has been reacting, which over the last fewer years has vowed that this strategy is fighting to see what we are actually dealing with. I mentioned this in an earlier text, where I emphasized how Westernization liberalized its existing antagonists and unfortunately, with all fresh day I am convinced that I was right. Unfortunately, he writes due to the fact that in my heart my goal is not to hit any organization or individual person. However, it is hard to pass indifferent to the public statements made by members of these organizations who openly urge repression and advocate repression against those whose American centres of influence have defined as unrighteous.
It is not that these people are abruptly to renounce their opinion just because, for example, my colleagues and I have others. After all, no 1 has to full agree with the activities of individuals and identify them with their imagination of the world. The diversity in the enquiry into certain conclusions is something completely normal, which is what we learn from the story, which we are trying present to effectively curve and rewrite. However, the point is that these people and organisations did not so far distance themselves from goals that could have been considered to any degree to coincide with those that accompany the anti-system environment and simply stood on the another side of the barricade. Stuffing your mouth with phrases about love for Poland, defending religion and maintaining our identity will not change anything about it. We have already known these analogous, rebellious statements about the request to cultivate the memory of independency and advance patriotism. We know the faces of the people who have spoken them, and above all, we have all seen why and who these people have actually served. No, it was surely not about the interests and interests of Polish citizens.
How, then, can we treat the online entry of the press spokesperson of the All-Polish Youth, who tries to explain Dr. Leszek Sykulski's expulsion from work, alternatively than as pro-systemicity and duplication of narratives promoted by the American war machine? The same applies to the statements of the president of 1 of the Polish National Movement circles, who, in his TT account, enjoys the same incident, and the National Movement itself not so much that it does not cut off from this statement, which simply approves it. How different, than just as reconciliation in the Polish state right, to call the behaviour of 1 of the editors of supposedly national portals, who publically mocks the attitude of Grzegorz Braun – the only MP in the Sejm who is not afraid to express his opposition to bringing Poland and our citizens into war? Let us add to this the promotion of the PiS communicative about the request for "military exercises", the increasingly raised subject of "new multiethnic nationalism" and the complete collusion of silence in terms of the persecution of Canon Church believers in Ukraine, and we will see that the actions taken by this environment are no different from those of the Yankees and the global ruling organization who has been walking in the bar for years.
What will the future bring? But fear to think of the decency of ourselves and of our fellow countrymen should be good thought and not lose hope of change.
Patrick Chruślak
