Shouting in debates, erstwhile the weaker side speaks simultaneously with its interlocutor only to drown him out, is nothing new. It was adequate to go, once, erstwhile I was there, and so possibly half a century ago, to the Różycki bazaar to witness specified a two-voice mouth. My relative, Varsovian by birth, he knew precisely who the top was. individual like me couldn't realize it. I don't get it anymore today. Since only the opposing organization begins to operate with insurmountable arguments, the opponent enters the word and everyone is right due to the fact that you will not realize either. Why is that? due to the fact that culture has fallen in its basic layer. individual who considers himself a politician grew up in the atmosphere of the Rosytsky bazaar. He can't accept that what he has to say won't surpass what his opponent has to say. N. p. in the PRL parliament, that was unthinkable. due to the fact that nothing could gain power against the organization line. It's slow and in the back door. It's just that individual in Tusk's crew must be right, and since it's usually not there, that's why we have the same image all the time: a writer chases an activist in the seismic corridors, he runs distant and happy erstwhile he managed to close the door in front of his nose. An even better way to do this is not to let Tusk into the show, or individual crucial journalists who could ask a embarrassing question. Trzaskowski explicitly said that the elections are to guarantee that there are no specified questions. individual little well-read will say that in the “people's democracy” it was unthinkable. And it was. Only with the exception that only the most chained heads believed that they should accept what the organization gives to belief.
I have lived completely consciously since 1945. As of 1948, the russian regime, the class struggle, the demolition of everything that remained after the Independent. However, 1956, it was a catch of breath, hope that although communism would be, it would be a gomułkowka prayer, or Polish one, due to the fact that Gomułka, unlike Tusk and any of his gags, thought in Polish. Since then we have been accompanied by the hope that Poland will be more and more. In contrast to this, Poland is now declining rapidly, and the ruthlessness of Brussels' leftist-libertian curate and the dependence on Berlin, greater than then on Moscow, allows only a doubtful hope that the strategy will not be "closed". Then it would be "17 republic", now "European". Which one's better?
But erstwhile the political maturity of Poles of the times of the Polish People's Republic is compared with what is happening today, there is no area for optimism. Last May 3rd, I watched a street interview, I think on the Coast, and I was terrified by the stupidity of responding, usually the elderly. no of them could make a single argument in favour of Trzaskovsky. 1 said he was a good candidate due to the fact that he is the president of Warsaw.
In the years of the Polish People's Republic, even many parties criticized the dependence of the Polish authorities on the Kremlin. Currently, about 1/3 of voters do not see that the submission of Poland to EU law far exceeds the muzzle of Moscow. At that time the hope that it would become more loose was growing, now 1 should anticipate that Poland's sovereignty would be only a historical concept.
This comparison could proceed forever. However, it is hard to anticipate that this will reverse the result in favour of our present reality. Democracy was not in the Polish People's Republic, it was, but it was popular, democracy is not now erstwhile the civilian Coalition governs, it is, but it is fighting. So you can talk about a tie in this case. As for another matters, then there was small hope, for the comparative unanimity of the Nation in defence of independent Poland. Today, a serious part of Poland's society – I hesitate to usage the word Nation here – is manipulated and – what to hide – indifferent to anything that does not concern prosperity and laissez faire in the worst genre. Of course, it is foolishness, which in the end can make it easier for Tusk to “close” the system, that is, a fresh Prussian tribute, only in the other direction. It is not von der Leyen who will kneel before Tusk, but him before her. What about linen? Lenno will be too, only Poland will be the Lenner of Germany. It is not excluded that Prussia will return. They were liquidated at the Potsdam Conference. Returning to the name of Prussia present by regionalists, let us add Polish, surely has a second bottom. Isn't it time and place to come to this, wo ist der Hund begraben?
