Warecki: The War in Donbasa – erstwhile did it start?

Despite the passage of 3 years and 8 months since the beginning of the war that is taking place behind our east border, many Poles inactive believe that it started with an unprovoked invasion of Russian troops into Ukraine.

The dominant state of consciousness is that, here on February 24, 2022, the Russian Federation made a "unprovoked" aggression against Ukraine in order to occupy it as part of the reconstruction of the erstwhile russian empire, whose Russian Federation is simply a legal successor. But the situation is completely different.

That's right.

It is very crucial to stand on the ground of fact in this regard, due to the fact that it can defend us from decisions that are harmful to us. Created by the media on the basis of media-duplicated hagada of bad Russia and innocent Ukraine's stereotype is an crucial origin allowing the ruling Polish political elites to keep a advanced level of rusophobia among Poles who play a akin function to the flagism played in Ukraine. It is based here on the false presumption generated by propaganda, that here any day now bloodthirsty Russia will attack and occupy Poland, which will be equivalent to the return of our country to the stone age. That's why it's very crucial to figure out how things were actually going, due to the fact that for the moment, it looks like people watching the movie from the mediate are convinced they're watching it from the beginning.

When did this war start?

If we look at the war as a continuation of politics, it can be said without any exaggeration that the current war in Ukraine began between 1947 and 1948 erstwhile the United States officially incorporated the alleged Gehlen Organization into its national safety apparatus. It was formed in June 1946 by the American German intelligence agency, formed on the basis of a Nazi intelligence cell operating on the east front. The gene was in charge. Reinhard Gehlenwho became the first head of the West German national Intelligence Service (BND) in 1956.

While in captivity, Gehlen convinced Americans that he had good contacts in the territories mastered by the USSR, including with Ukrainian nationalists. This was very crucial in the position of the beginning of the Cold War, due to the fact that the Anglo-Saxons wanted to usage Ukraine as a tool to weaken the USSR. Cooperation with the Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists was very intense through the Gehlena Group until 1954, erstwhile the Soviets suppressed the active phase of the bander rebellion in the then russian Ukraine. Later, the CIA maintained political ties with bander survivors mainly through Ukrainian diaspora in the West. To a large degree it was made up of banders who fled to Germany first after planet War II, and then many of them settled in Canada, Australia, large Britain and the United States, where they gained considerable political influence as an crucial origin in the cold war struggles of the Anglo-Saxons from the USSR.

In conclusion, the United States has practically since the end of planet War II seen Ukraine as a territory to be utilized to destabilise first the USSR and then the Russian Federation. So the ongoing war began at the minute erstwhile that decision was made, or at the beginning of the Cold War. This was confirmed by the process of dismantling the russian Union, which was primarily aimed at separating Ukraine as a separate geopolitical entity and then importantly strengthening it in the counter to Russia.

Rehabilitation and renewal of flagism

This U.S. utilitarian approach to Ukraine as a tool to harm Russia came out again in 2004, erstwhile the presidential election won a Russian-speaking politician, Viktor Yanukovych. This was unacceptable for those who wanted to usage Ukraine as a base to harm Russia. So he was accused of corruption and election falsification, which led to unrest in the tired iniquities of politicians and poorness of Ukrainian society. This led to a constitutionally contrary 3rd circular of presidential elections. This time he won Viktor Yushchenko, a staunch Ukrainian chauvinist who was first in independent Ukraine to make a national hero Stepan Bandera, leader of the Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists, responsible, among others, for the cruel execution of 130 1000 to half a million Poles.

Although it may seem shocking for many Poles, it was not surprising, due to the fact that it was the fruit of a ten-year process which was consistently implemented. Thanks to General Gehlen, the Americans saw the tremendous possible of flagism in their war against the USSR and later Russia. Therefore, not only did they not fight this criminal ideology, but they carefully preserved it, in order to re-transplant it to Ukrainian soil, in contravenes to Russia's rising knee after the ruining governments Boris Jelcin.

Under US protection

From the end of planet War II to the present flagism is under the protection of the United States and their, besides Polish, vassals. Not by accident in Ellenville, a fewer twelve kilometres from fresh York City, in 1962 a monument was erected in honor of Ukraine's “heroes”. The monument consists of a needle on a stature topped with Ukrainian trident and standing on both sides by busts Semena Petlura, Jewhen Konowalc, Roman Shuchewycz and Stepana Bandery. It's in front of that monument. accumulated children of Ukrainian diaspora, dancing and reciting poems to the glory of Ukrainian “heroes”. There is simply a camp for children and youth from the Ukrainian diaspora in which the banders conduct 3 training cycles each summer, during which young people parade in Nazi uniforms with burning torches, singing band songs and carrying portraits of Stepan Bandera. akin centres were opened in Canada ("Veselka", "Verchovyna", "Bilohorsza", "Karpaty, "Dibrova", in which children from diaspora were instilled in love with the aforementioned "national heroes". The Banderers are excellent on the North American continent, due to the fact that they are inactive needed Americans to poison Ukrainians with hatred for Russia. For this reason, the CIA was doing everything it could to turn them into the regulation of Ukraine, due to the fact that only they could turn this country into an excellent tool to harm Russia.

From explanation to practice

However, despite the imposition of Ukrainian flag of Yushchenko, the poisoning of Ukraine with hatred of Russia went rather hard. To the surprise of the Americans in 2010, the 2010 presidential election was won by Viktor Yanukovych. He should not have won, but he won, due to the fact that for Ukrainian rulers since 2004, the flags solving the real problems of Ukrainians was not a priority. The failure of flags to their American sponsors was a bitter pill adequate that at the right time they triggered another crisis, investing $5 billion in it. The pretext was that president Yanukovych did not sign an association agreement with the European Union in 2013, for which there were crucial reasons. Meanwhile, the Anglo-Saxon agitators managed to convince the Ukrainians that the key to their welfare is the European Union, so the failure to sign the agreement was presented as a blow to their dreams of a prosperous and carefree life. As a result, the US-owned protests began on November 21, 2013 and led to the overthrow of president Yanukovych.

At this point, the banners took full power over Ukraine. Their goal was, what they did not hide, to deprive the political rights of the Russian-speaking population and to immediately expel all manifestations of Russian-speaking culture from Ukraine. From day to day, everything associated with Russia became bad. The reaction to this was protests of the Russian-speaking population, which were brutally suppressed by bander militias. In 2014, banders with known Volyn atrocities murdered 48 Russians in Odessa, as well as many others in Mariupol, Donetsk and Lugansk. From that minute on, there was no turning back, and that's what the Americans meant. This was the turning point where the active conflict phase began.

Course for War

The American concept was to make Ukraine, which was not only independent of Russia, but even hostile to it, which could become a component of NATO's expansion, which aimed at the interior disintegration of Russia and its division into smaller parts (for this reason the rebellion in Chechnya in 1994, in which they besides fought against Russia adherents of Bandera worship from Ukraine), so that it would never be able to usage its resources again to challenge the West, as it did in the russian Union.

What happened on February 24, 2022, is portrayed by Western propaganda as admitting to the Russians that they do not want peace. Let us remember, however, that it was the Russians who saved peace in Ukraine after a bloody coup in February 2014. At the turn of 2014 and 2015, the faithful troops of the Ukrainian army were surrounded in Debalcewo. Vladimir Putin He could then let for their full destruction, and even occupy the full Donbas without much difficulty, but he did not. At the time, she called him. Angela Merkel, begging him to influence the insurgents to let the circular Ukrainians go. She argued that this would make conditions for peaceful resolution of the conflict and Putin agreed to it. In this way, he created the foundations for an agreement, then known as "Minsk II" (February 2015) aimed at ending the conflict in east Ukraine, preserving the territorial full of Ukraine (excluding Crimea, included in the Russian Federation in March 2014) in exchange for granting the Russian-speaking population interior autonomy.

Throughout the later period Russia fulfilled its obligations, as opposed to the authorities imposed as a consequence of the coup in Kiev, which did not intend to do so from the beginning. This was admitted by Angela Merkel erstwhile in November 2022 she said in a conversation with the weekly weekly “Der Spiegel” that "During negotiations in Minsk, she bought the time Ukraine could usage to better defy the Russian attack". Her words were confirmed by the erstwhile president of France Francois Hollande and the predecessor of Zelenski, Petro Poroshenko. Russia was ready to full implement the Minsk agreements, but for the opposing organization they were only a tactical action in time to rebuild the Ukrainian army to NATO standards so that it could wage war against the insurgents in Donbasa. So the only 1 who truly tried to accomplish peace through the Minsk agreements was Vladimir Putin.

The West rejects the negotiations

The full size of this betrayal became apparent in the autumn of 2021 erstwhile the Russians accused the signatories of the Minsk agreements – Germans and French – of failing to implement them. Without seeing any good intentions on their part, they besides abandoned the Minsk Agreements and proposed a fresh peace expression based on the Treaty on the European safety System. The Russian side prepared 2 draft agreements – 1 for the US and the another for NATO – which were presented on 17 December 2021. These included, among others, halting NATO's expansion to the east and withdrawing NATO forces from the states that joined the alliance after 1997. In addition, they besides provided for an agreement on the non-displacement of offensive weapons close the borders of Russia and a simplification in the number of mid- and short-range missiles fired from land. These proposals were ignored by the West.

Despite the arrogance of Western states, in January and February 2022 Russia tried to hold talks to deescalate the conflict and establish peace with the Ukrainian side. Although the formal negotiations continued until the start of the peculiar Military Operation, in fact the Ukrainian side staged them stalling in the face of the Donbas concentration conducted in February 2022. By the start of the Russian military intervention, they were able to gather between 60 and 80,000 soldiers. 10 days before the entry of Russian wax into Donbass, the Ukrainians began an intense artillery shelling of areas overrun by insurgents. In this situation, Russia considered that there was no another way but to begin peculiar Military Operations.

But what was this peculiar Military Operation? The Russians did not mean to conquer Ukraine, but to have Ukraine sit at the negotiating table. And it worked. Six days after the start of the peculiar Military Operation, the Ukrainian delegation went to talk to Homla in Belarus. There were 3 rounds of negotiations in Homl and then the talks were moved to Istanbul, Turkey. There, at the beginning of April, an authoritative message was signed, a draft peace treaty under which Ukraine, among others, in exchange for guaranteeing the rights of the Russian-speaking population was to regain its territory (of course without authoritative Russian Crimea).

Practically everything was finished, and the Russians withdrew troops from Kiev, Chernihov and Sum in a motion of goodwill. But the Prime Minister of large Britain came to Kiev urgently Boris Johnson (as it turned out, well-paid by the maker of combat drones) and convinced Zelenski to say no. And the current war phase is simply a consequence of this refusal. They all focused on the Russian troops entering on February 24, 2022, as the beginning of the war, while the war began long before. It should be understood that this war has continued since the alleged collective West uses Ukraine as a tool to harm the USSR first and later Russia.

Russia's strategical Failure

The collaboration of Western military elites with Ukrainian ultranationalists and Nazis is part of a geostrategic game that aims to "extortion of Russian economy and armed forces and political position of government in and abroad", which would lead to a weakening of Russia. It's written straight by authors report published in 2019 by RAND corp – a investigation centre established in 1948 for the needs of the US Armed Forces. In short, the point is to destabilise the interior situation in Russia and at the same time keep tension at its borders. The generation of the conflict in Ukraine was a key aspect of these actions, besides taking place in the Caucasus and Central Asia. This is so a long-term strategical reasoning on the part of the US, aimed at creating instability in the close vicinity of Russia and, above all, in the erstwhile russian territories, in order to weaken Russia or as others say: in order to bring Russia into strategical failure.

This would in practice mean the full economical collapse of Russia, which has been attempted in fresh years by sanctions. The full economical collapse would in turn lead to a breakdown of social structures. This was needed to repeat what happened in Kiev in Moscow in 2014. To accomplish this, the Anglo-Saxons set a trap for Russia by militarizing Ukraine. The Americans wanted to bring the situation to a level that the Russians would take to the streets and overthrow Vladimir Putin. In their view, this was possible by dragging Russia into a war with Ukraine, which would consequence in the collapse of the Russian economy. It was a long-term strategy developed just after Majdan 2014.

Strategic failure, but whose?

All of these activities were to replace Vladimir Putin with an obedient Anglo-Som puppet in the kind of Boris Jelcin and reconstruct Russia to the state of the 1990s. This is precisely what Russia's strategical failure is about. The Russians have entered a trap, but not to the problem of the Anglo-Saxons. Although the cheese has not yet been eaten, the spring has fallen. The strategy of defeating Russia by dragging it into an unsuccessful war has completely failed. presently tiny bites, but regularly Russia swallows Ukrainian cheese and everything indicates that the Anglo-Saxons not only will not get to the Russian Mendelejev board, but will besides lose their assets on the plundered Ukraine.

The Russian Federation is stronger present than always in its post-missive history. If the nonsubjective and task of the conflict in Ukraine was to exhaust Russia to the limits of endurance, it became precisely the opposite. Apparently, the president of the United States saw this. Donald Trumpwho, realistically assessing the situation, knows that this war must end and therefore, contrary to the hardened rusophobes surrounding it, meets Vladimir Putin. Meanwhile, Europe, which preposterously places Russia as an enemy, commits collective suicide.

Under what conditions can the war in Ukraine end? Only in 1 way: the complete triumph of Russia, which is to accomplish all the goals declared by Vladimir Putin. Russia's eventual goal is most likely to include Ukraine in the union state, now created by Russia and Belarus, and to expel NATO structures from countries bordering Russia. The Russian Federation will never let the Anglo-Saxon-dominated West to proceed its policy since 1948, utilizing Ukraine as a cancer in Russia's body.

Krzysztof Warecki