The paradigm of explanation of social and geopolitical phenomena must become the thesis of the end of Western Civilization, set in the early 20th century by Oswald Spengler in his canonical work The Twilight of the West. After Spengler, countless intellectuals took up the same theme, for example, James Burnham in the untranslated Polish book The Suicide of the West: An Essay on the Meaning and Destiny of Liberalism, Pat Buchanan in the sensational “Death of the West. How extinct populations and invasions of immigrants endanger our country and our civilization” or late Douglas Murray in "The unusual Death of Europe". Reality provides countless empirical facts confirming the thesis put forward by authors: for at least a 100 years the West has been losing its territory, demographically dying out, culturally and economically failing, is increasingly threatened by bankruptcy and insolvency. Whoever denies this reality is denying the fact and surviving in fiction.
How does this paradigm address the current situation of war in east Europe? The Western war with Russia is already under way, and it has not just been officially declared. We can have no uncertainty that the intent of the national government of the United States is to remove the unincorporated centres of power to establish a global hegemony of the democratic-liberal system. The United States has overturned power in fresh decades and has brought chaos to many countries specified as Iraq and Libya. We know present that there was no "weapon of mass destruction" in Iraq. Americans grant themselves the exclusive right to overthrow uncomfortable regimes, and if any another state militaryly enforces the right to defend its own interests, they consider them “terrorist”. Western states transfer tremendous military and financial resources to Ukraine. There's no open war, and hopefully it won't happen. Never head the anticipation of starting a atomic conflict, which in itself would be a global disaster. More crucial are the long-term effects on the future of civilization. Any war between European nations in the present demographic situation of the Western and Orthodox planet is another nail to the coffin, undoubtedly speeding up the extinction of these cultural circles. Of course, by looking at demographic statistic from countries specified as the United States, France or the United Kingdom, we see a constant population growth. However, the fact is that it is due to mass imports of immigrants from culturally alien circles alternatively than native fertility. cultural populations die out in both the West and the Orthodox world. At the same time through its absolutely mindless policy of sanctions and isolation of Russia, The West cuts off nearly a 100 and 50 million people who are closer to it culturally than Asians and Africans. Moreover, it cuts Europe off from the most crucial natural resources it needs to survive, just as any organism needs food. Bringing them from culturally hostile states, at higher prices, makes the situation worse for which average citizens will pay. Already today, an average Western citizen is burdened with countless taxes and regulations that take distant at least 50 percent of his monthly income. Through the expansion of bureaucracy and social states, economical growth is halted, it prevents the free creation of fresh businesses and jobs and yet it kills children and families due to the fact that people do not have the means to establish them. This is the reality of the seemingly “democratic-liberal” The West and the cut-off from inexpensive and good natural materials from Russia and its multimillion-dollar population are making this situation worse. The proposal is one: there is no Europe without Russia and there cannot be Russia without Europe.
Russia's isolation forces it into the hands of totalitarian China and this is another nail accelerating the “death of the West”. Over time, the country will be colonized by a stronger neighbour. This in turn will give China a powerful injection of inexpensive natural materials that they request to further develop. present we are already witnessing Russia's view of China and India's grace, which is forced to sale oil half as inexpensive as before. The stronger China will be, the weaker the West will be. Despite economical cooperation, it should not be forgotten that China is simply a totalitarian state, with a certain amount of capitalism at the economical level. Orwell's "point system", centralised authorities, ubiquitous surveillance, the "one child" policy (last suspended due to the demographic disaster) and the dominance of 1 organization is simply a actual image of the modern mediate State. Communism went bankrupt in the late 20th century, but it did not cease to exist. He made a merger with Western capitalism taking the form of a "liberal democracy" in Europe and the US, in China he survived in his classical form. Communist China was and is simply a deadly enemy of the West, and their goal is global dominance. Russia is simply a associate of the BRICS group of China, India, Brazil and South Africa. Given the size of China and India, and the imperialist urges of the former, there can be no uncertainty that Russia, Brazil and South Africa are to be only an appetizer for the acquisition of natural resources. Russia already accepts the ideological interest of the Asian and African worlds as its credo in geopolitics. Vladimir Putin openly says that Asian, African and South American countries should take their place in global relations. He states that the West is illegally holding its dominant position. What does that mean for the West? The more strength and importance Asia and Africa have, the little the West has, and this accelerates the process of its dusk. Globalism is naivety, a utopia designed to make a fresh Tower of Babel. Africa and Asia have been enemies of the West for thousands of years, with countless wars which have threatened Europe's endurance many times. If anyone thinks that something has changed, he is naive. The enemy will be the enemy. The only thing that's changed is the form of conflict. From the battlefields, the fight was transferred to economical and commercial spheres.
In Russia we observe any kind of ideological revival oscillating around the thought of Tradition, attachment to religion and cultural identity. The most celebrated ideology of this rebirth is Alexander Dugin, whose doctrine has its origin in the thoughts of 20th-century traditionalists: René Guénon and Julius Evoli. Russia places itself on the front of defending conventional values and puts itself in opposition to the West, identifying liberal and degenerate values. However, without the demographic forces that she desperately lacks, she will not be able to make a real opposition to global powers. all large movement of past has a demographic at its core. An example may be the Cross expeditions, or the drastic expansion of the Vikings in the early mediate Ages. "Demography is destiny," sounds an old saying. In the demographic crisis, Russia cannot act alone. As a vassal state of China, feeding its more powerful neighbour natural materials, it becomes a disaster to the West. Isolating and demonizing Russia, it is precisely this catastrophe that is being given to us by the demoliberal, or, in fact, neo-communist, mad and realized, pseudo-elites from Brussels and Washington.
Mariusz Starved
