The sanation, however, understood that before you start screaming, you gotta see what happened. For example, there was an incidental with Lithuania and a borderer died. But there was a reservation to verify that it was our fault. In the meantime, what's going on right now is any kind of embarrassment. I remind you that we are already 2025 and the Russian-Ukrainian war has been going on for 3 1/2 years. There was time for an educational run about neutrality, etc. Meanwhile, everyone's off the hook. I didn't accidentally skip the Russian drone attack on us due to the fact that they do the clangor first and then they check what happened. The main harm was done by our own anti-aircraft missile, but Russia should pay for it.
Interestingly, they don't learn anything. The wires didn't teach them anything. There, too, we were dealing with an anti-aircraft missile. The nation, on the another hand, has not been instructed about the importance of neutrality and its maintenance. Sweden fought russian submarines during the Second War, for example, and it appears that 2 drowned. You have your territorial waters and you defend them. But they besides built minesteads correspondence with German to block the Baltic. Interestingly, a Swedish ship sailing from South America in the Atlantic was defended by the British against the German attack, and in the Baltic by the Germans was defended from the russian attack. The Swedes introduced supply limits for natural materials, bearings, steel for the militant side and respected them. The British sent fast boats for this, which in territorial waters were defended by Swedes from Germany. The Swiss defended their airspace against German and Allied aircraft, etc.
Neutrality can be violated and specified a violation is called an incident. There may be different types of these incidents, may be popularized by Dr. Bartosiak asymmetric attack. Society should be informed of these forms of human activity. State formations prepared for action. In the meantime, any incomprehensible disturbance arose at the Wire and now. The surprise that people (33%) did not believe in Russian drones is unjustified after the mentioned tragedy in the Wire, where an anti-aircraft rocket killed 2 people. Has anyone published the rules on damages? According to me, Russians should pay.
Our current regime, whose comprador character is unquestionable, flew to Trump crying for 20 drones. It's kind of embarrassing. 3 years of war and we have no anti-drone defense, the government pushes us into German solutions, while our company produces specified solutions for Ukraine. And how much are they gonna order and how much do we need? As always he brandes liars from the requirements of the modern battlefield. I remind you: how reasonable people opposed the erasing of Merida tanks and another weapons with the justification that against Russia could be utilized to defend it, the liar-speaking that they did not meet the requirements of the modern battlefield. And that they can be utilized in the back, to combat landings, to replenish their losses? The imagination of the upcoming russian threat sparked rage, but besides hope for the arrival of the Red Army which would yet pursuit the pigs. I mean, I explain to the lemmings: the fury sparked informing against the threat of Russian aggression, as probable. In turn, aggression itself gives emergence to the hope of a social affluent neobolshevik. To fight drones, we request any pots, any Diegtiarievs, etc.
What can any government do in this situation? Any time I say. It can buy roads (roads I say) an anti-drone system. Which won't be adequate to defend the drone, due to the fact that they won't buy enough. And ammunition besides expensive. In general, they are able to make a multi-annual modernisation programme for billions but are incapable to solve current problems. For example, Kevlar helmets enter. How long have we utilized steel and replaced it? possibly not.
And here comes the title cheetah: What is simply a cheetah and were the problems the shortcomings of that cheetah, or was it?
I leave the feats of Minister Błaszczak for another occasion, likewise the problem of negotiations. We have an unpolitical example of negotiations in Fire and Sword in the form of the Kisiel voivode, which is the answer to the ignorant thesis that a criminal is not to be talked to. I'm moving to Trump, where they cried due to the fact that 20 drones flew in:
Trump has planted Żeleński, which president Duda should have done long ago. The gellenian fickled him, he cut off the help. The week lasted for the boiler house, before they realized they had nothing (who understood? EU and France and Germany) and they calmed down. due to the fact that they have nothing. Trump's betting on specifics, and that's what you plan. You have a period to clean up – specified an ultimatum has given them. At first, they would displace, they would fictitize that French atomic shield, that money, that satellite strategy in 3 years. But they realized they had nothing and they were calm.
Rightly, editor Ziemkiewicz puts the thought of entering in 4 letters. If you overdo it, they don't respect you and they start to underestimate you. Where'd he compose it down? I'm asking due to the fact that I don't want to look for a show. The Ukrainians thought we were U.S. stooges, and we don't have our own opinion, and we don't request to be reckoned with due to the fact that we're gonna do what Biden says. Meanwhile, we had to make any demands, moderate. The writers couldn't even get TiR drivers. If the Ukrainians don't want to do the exhumation, that means they don't request our aid besides much and we don't gotta stick together. We can transfer 30 tanks, but we can transfer 150. And how much we give them depends on them. It's an introduction.
Returning to Trump: they came to him with the information that they can't handle 20 drones, that they don't have procedures, that they don't know what to do at all. And they wonder at his attitude. He won't parent them for sure. He needs to go with a circumstantial offer: Donald we have this and this and we offer this and this, in return we want that and siamto, but inexpensive and good. It's not a applicable chore. The writers have the other modus operandi, which I wrote about: if we give individual a million zlotys without anything, he will feel obliged to give us an apartment. And we are servants of the Ukrainian people.
I compose it fast due to the fact that all thread needs to be hit by an epope.
