Do you think I'm stupid?
No, I just think you're very unlucky erstwhile it comes to thinking.
Perhaps not everyone knows what this is. It is 1 of the Chinese online e-commerce platforms, which is reported to have respective million users in Poland itself. Recently, EU services have taken action against this. The European Commission initiated a formal investigation and a Chinese platform with respective allegations. 1 of these is the distribution of illegal goods, and it is not entirely clear which goods would be involved. many observers indicate that virtually the full scope of stores from Temu portal can be found at another retailers. For example, Amazon sells identical goods and the only difference is the seller and the price. A small taller, of course. And that's most likely where the dog is buried.
https://www.euractiv.pl/section/economy/news/eu-introduction-against-theme/
https://ekoetos.pl/beda-specific-action-against-temu-i-shein-country-ue-and-more-defined/
Finding a Comprehensive Description of Positions This accusation in media reports is difficult, due to the fact that everyone only gives a choice according to their own key.
One of the charges is the usage of low paid workers, mediocre working conditions, and even hiring children. erstwhile Western companies do this, the subject is soaped down with bureaucratic tricks or expected audits, consisting of pre-announced visits of officials from the corporate office who visit carefully selected and decently prepared facilities. It is besides a unusual chance that no 1 is disturbed by the expected rescue of the climate by electromobility, despite their excellent cognition of the employment of children and the inhuman working conditions of workers who mine battery and magnet components in mediocre countries.
In order to get the right perspective, it is worth realizing that the same European rulers that are presently suffering from Chinese stores have themselves caused the dismantling of European manufacture and the removal of all production to the Far East. Their actions are at the root of the current state. In the light of this fact, the media headlines look very ridiculous and ridiculous: Chinese trash is flooding... It's been flooded a long time and it's not always tacky. The reality is ruthless and most of our products come from China, regardless of the store. So why would individual fund intermediaries if they could buy without them?
Another reason for the attack on Chinese stores is alleged consumer defence. I don't truly realize what the problem is. I have never utilized this, but my many years of experience with another Chinese online store is only positive. Let me point out that I have not yet thought of buying something there for more than PLN 200, it is about the anticipation of enforcing a long-term guarantee.
One of the major allegations facing Chinese e-commerce platforms is unfair marketing, false presentation of product characteristics, concealing deficiencies, exaggerating advantages, etc. Again, comparing these platforms with Amazon is not beneficial to him. In Jeff Bezos' shop, the descriptions of the goods are much more laconic, most frequently do not carry useful information about the product. Much more can be learned about the same product by entering the pages of its Chinese sellers. Nevertheless, unfair marketing is at the forefront of the European Commission's list of allegations, and we will see how things will turn out.
Unfair marketing is not the sole domain of online shops. It is targeted by politicians, and especially American Democrats, whose goods are not of the first kind. I wrote about Kamala Harris' serious problems with giving interviews and public appearances. Problems in this area may be indicative of the shortages of intellectual candidates for the most crucial office of the planet power, proof of its figurework, so staff and sold media do everything to hide them.
The massive cover-up of serious shortcomings of a candidate for the office of president is nothing but dishonest marketing and even interference in elections. This was the presumption of Donald Trump's lawyers filing a suit against CBS News station for manipulating an interview with Kamala Harris conducted by the station on October 7.
Trump demands $10 billion in damages for "party and illegal acts of interference in elections and voting" from CBS, which, according to the lawsuit, aimed at misleading the public and "trying to tip the scales" in favour of Democrats in the 2024 presidential election. In a complaint filed at the United States territory Court in the North territory of Texas, CBS stations are accused of generating 2 different versions of Harris' consequence to the question of Israel's war with Hamas asked during the interview.
To hide Kamala's weakness by issuing a "word salad" alternatively of factual statements, CBS utilized its national platform in the program 60 Minutes, crossing the line between judgement in reporting events and fraudulent, deceptively manipulating messages – we read in the lawsuit.
In addition to monetary compensation, Trump requested a full trial involving a jury. In the lawsuit, he besides demands that CBS not print any edited section of interview 60 Minutes and that it be made publically available the full unedited movie and the accompanying evidence of Kamala Harris' full interview. So fundamentally he's demanding that we present unmanipulated facts. Most of the content of the suit is reflected in a letter that the lawyer of the erstwhile president had previously sent to CBS asking for an unedited evidence and threatening to sue.
https://edition.cnn.com/2024/10/23/media/cbs-news-trump-60-minutes-legal-threat/index.html
Apart from concealing the truth, CBS has no reason to reject specified a reasonable request. Any reliable information organization should welcome the chance to clarify the case – unless doing so would embarrass and exposure the organisation – the suit states.
CBS News rejected Trump's request on 26 October, stating in a letter that his demands were based on a “mistakeful assumption”.
Of course, the suit is primarily part of the election theatre. This is indicated by the absurdly advanced amount of compensation. However, it is not entirely unfounded and its task was primarily to realise as many people as possible, what Kamala Harris, a candidate for the office of president of the United States, and how much they are manipulated by the media in this matter.
Obedient Democrats American mainstream media and mindlessly repeating Polish media have nothing to say about it. Polish media are a tiny tube of large propaganda tubes from across the ocean. Serviceworthy journalists repeat the issue prepared by propaganda experts of the large brother that Trump allegedly declared war on the media. due to the fact that it is.
We have seen specified times erstwhile demanding from journalists journalism, integrity, impartiality and fact is simply a war on the media.
It is worth mentioning here a fragment of my erstwhile post on the function of the military-industrial complex in policy-making. The complex defends its interests with the aid of seized politicians and the media, and we are to take their products carelessly, at most by arguing for secondary matters and excitrating ourselves with sedated foolishness.
This was perfectly summed up by Frank Zappa, a superb composer, an excellent musician and social critic with a penetrating mind.
Politics is the amusement department of the military and industrial complex
Frank Zappa left behind a immense mass of customs sayings that we can find on the pages with quotes (many of them were deliberately twisted to dull their blades), but mostly his music. She, too, frequently communicates us with noteworthy insights. For example, Eskimo wisdom: Don't eat yellow snow (Guess why? Don't Eat the Yellow Snow - 1974).
Especially the 1 the media and politicians are trying to feed us.
Thank you for reading Substack Jack! Subscribe for free to receive fresh posts and support my work.
