Unknown, hidden, and shocking facts about the death of blessed fr.

3obieg.pl 5 months ago

Unknown, frantic, and shocking factions concerning the death of Blessed Father Jerzezyko.

IS THE president TK PROF. Andrzej Rzeplinski, KS Murderers. SUELS?

What he knows and what he knows. ANDRZEPLINSKI?

LECHA WOOD “BOLKA” THE HOPE FOR CURRENT BLOOD. THE PRINCE OF JESUS FEED.

WHAT DO THEY KNOW AND WHAT ARE THE SECRETERS OF WACHOWSKI?

The face of Fr. Popiełuszko was so massacred that it was hard to admit him. Fr Grzegorz Kalwarczyk's account reproduces frightening details. Among another things, Fr Kalwarczyk cites a passage from the doctor's statement:

‘He stated that in his medical practice he had never performed an autopsy that would have been as damaged internally as in the case of the inside of the body of Fr Jerzy."

And another undisclosed in the evidence of the doctor performing the autopsy, the fact that during the torture, the tongue was ripped out to Father George.

For over 20 years, people have been killed in unusual circumstances trying to find out the fact about the execution of priest Jerzy Popiełuszko. Who is sabotaging the investigation into the “crime of the century”?

-"Stop talking, or you'll end up in Wisla like your brother” – Józef Popiełuszko, the brother of Fr Jerzy, heard these words on the phone.

He was the 1 who helped IPN investigators with his evidence to explain the fact about the crime at the chaplain of Solidarity.

The blackmailers demanded of him and his loved ones not to talk to prosecutors, not remember anything and not talk about the priest.

They threatened to die respective times.

Joseph Popieluszko was fearless in his quest to establish the fact about his brother's death.

He paid for his perseverance with large tragedy. In 1996, his wife, Jadwiga Popieluszko, died in a infirmary in Białystok. In the death certificate, the laconic expression was entered as origin of death: “Methyl alcohol poisoning’.

This is an astonishing reason, due to the fact that Mrs. Popieluszko was known as a non-drinking person.

She besides amazes the alcohol content of her blood, well above the lethal dose.

Despite the family's requests, the autopsy was unsuccessful, indicating the actual origin of death.

This doctor has never performed the ER section.

Who would be so badly damaged

I noticed small needle marks on her hands around her veins.

They indicated that individual injected this woman into the vein with poison in the form of concentrated alcohol – he tells “Polish Radio” wishing to stay anonymous to a doctor from the Bialystok infirmary who was the first to see the body of the deceased.

‘- Then my superior pressured me not to mention it to anyone and as shortly as possible forgot the matter.”

The intimidation of Joseph Popieluszko and the mysterious death of his wife is just 1 of many tragic episodes of the violent play of the PRL peculiar services. Its aim from the beginning is to close the mouth to all persons who could undermine the authoritative version of the crime on the priest Jerzy Popieluszka.

The game began a fewer days after the martyr's death of Chaplain Solidarity and continues to this day.

"Polish Radio" has recreated the scenes of 1 of the top hoaxes of fresh years.

SECRETES OF THE PLANT

The authoritative version of the investigation into uncovering the massacred body of a priest is simply a lie.

It was Krzysztof Manko – a diver from Wrocław – that already on October 26, 1984, in the afternoon, he was the first to find the body of priest Popieluszko in Wisła.

What happened a fewer hours later is known by the evidence of those present on that day at the dam.

– The corpses were re-emerged by divers, then hooked into the pontoon and towed thus to shore. Where there was a temporary base of divers and a search team, the “Nysa” brand car came and the body was loaded to it – reads in the minutes of the proceeding of Andrzej Czerwiński – a Wroclaw financier.

Thanks, among another things, to these testimonies, IPN prosecutors established that the man who first extracted the priest's body was Krzysztof Mańko.

Relatives of the diver to whom we have reached say that after this incident, Manko was terrified of something. He didn't want to talk to anyone, he shut himself up, and then he left home and never came back.

He received his passport on 1 November 1984 and left Poland.

He inactive lives and works in Greece.

After 2000, he successfully avoided gathering with investigators of the Institute of National Memory.

– This man has cognition that may prove crucial to re-enact the course of the crime— Says the prosecutors who investigated the execution of a priest.

Only this diver could aid find what happened to the priest's body after his final extraction from the Vistula on 30 October. Mańko himself is inactive silent and does not want to return to Poland. Thanks to the evidence of employees of the Włocławska dam, IPN investigators discovered that after 26 October the first section of the priest's body was carried out. Meanwhile, the evidence of the Włocław prosecutors who were investigating the case in 1984 shows that this section was performed by an anatomologist from the Provincial infirmary in Bydgoszcz. However, no individual interviewed could callback his name. This section has not been preserved in the infirmary archive (although the law requires specified papers to be kept for 20 years).

THE SERIOUS CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH OF THE COVALENT TADEUSS

The circumstances of the death of Tadeusz Kowalski are equally mysterious. Tadeusz Kowalski – a fisherman from Włocławska cooperative “Certa” – utilized to poach Wisla in the evening. He was accompanied by a colleague and a brother-in-law.On 25 October 1984, around 22:00 p.m. Kowalski and his 2 companions saw mysterious men throw the body of Fr Jerzy Popiełuszko into the sink. They were so close that the priest's corpse almost fell into their boat. 3 men promised themselves silence. They were afraid for their lives. What they saw, they only told the IPN prosecutors. A fewer weeks after the deposition, Tadeusz Kowalski went to the hospital, where he died after a fewer days. In the death certificate, the origin is stated as “methyl alcohol poisoning’. It's amazing, due to the fact that the reason for Jadwiga's death is besides defined. Given the date of death, the kind of illness and the duration of his infirmary stay, it should be assumed that Kowalski was poisoned with alcohol during hospitalization. Friends remember him as a man enjoying a successful household life, happy, healthy. Is it possible for a fortunate man in his 50s to commit suicide by drinking poisoned alcohol? Explaining this case may be very difficult, due to the fact that Kowalski's autopsy wasn't carried out, although his household was trying to do so.

SHARE KGB

Andrzej Grabiński, during the PRL period, was the shadow of an chance to explain the fact about the crime, a well-known defender of oppositionists, during the “Torrun process” of the auxiliary prosecutor representing the Popieluszków family. Grabinski – a highly educated lawyer – from the beginning saw gross errors in court proceedings that did not lead to an explanation of the truth. The counselor – not satisfied that the court did not detect the real initiators of the crime – announced the appeal. If this had happened, the ultimate Court would gotta reopen the full process. This could have thwarted the full plan of large hoax. A fewer days before the deadline for lodging an appeal in a home in Saska Kępa belonging to the Grabinski family, a bomb exploded, resulting in the death of 25-year-old Margaret Grabinska. In the course of the investigation, it turned out that the owner of the home was not a celebrated patron, and the convergence of their names was accidental. Until today, it has not been established whether it was an effort to intimidate or execution a lawyer. The chances of explaining this case are slim, due to the fact that after 1989, the material from this investigation was missing.

On November 30, 1984, a mysterious road accident occurred in Białobrzegi – a tiny town on the Kraków-Warsaw route. Around 8:00 p.m. on the road from Krakow Fiat hit a rushed deer. 2 passengers were killed at the scene Fiat And their driver. The militias have limited themselves to entering in the protocol that travellers Fiat They had no chance, and the truck driver ran distant from the scene. No investigation was initiated to explain the circumstances of the accident and no effort was made to find the truck or identify its driver. No witnesses were questioned, although a tragic collision was well seen by respective local residents.

"I learned about this accident the day before, in the evening, before it happened" – says Stefan Bratkowski – a author and erstwhile opposition activist. ‘I was just wondering what they'd come up with. erstwhile the press reported it was a car accident, I had no uncertainty that it was a fake murder.”

Bratkowski was informed by his friend – the no-living Warsaw lawyer Bogumił Studziński. General Jaruzelski – Colonel Artur Gotówko said in 1991: "There in Białobrzeg, the victims were not given the slightest chance. I know how to do this.” The IPN prosecutors who undertook this game rapidly discovered that the truck rammed the Fiat precisely according to the methods of scholars on peculiar NKVD courses, and then KGB and GRU. In the accident in Białobrzegi, 2 MMA officers were killed by Colonel Stanisław Trafalski and Major Wiesław Friday. They returned from the south of Poland, where for respective erstwhile weeks they explored earlier activities and associations of Grzegorz Piotrowski, Leszek Pękali and Waldemar Chmielewski.

Of all the activities, they compiled detailed reports and notes that they carried in the trunk of the Fiat. This documentation was never found. They are besides not mentioned in post-accident protocols. On the another hand, any of their notes were preserved during work in Krakow and Tarnów and left in their operational files. By accident, they were not destroyed between 1989 and 1990, so that the IPN took over. These notes concern the activity of Grzegorz Piotrowski aimed at the Church and priests. They let you to learn crucial details from the life of the chief murderer chaplain of “Solidarity”.

VACATION WITH AGENT

Grzegorz Sławomir Piotrowski (born 23 May 1951 in Łódź) is simply a safety service officer in the times of the Polish People's Republic, the killer of priest Jerzy Popieluszko.

Graduate of XXIX LO in Łódź. By education, a mathematician. He worked in the 4th Department of the MMA, from December 1982 to February 1983, the Group chief D of this department, dealing with activities against the Catholic Church in Poland, as captain of SB.

According to the preserved documentation of trips of the 4th Department of the MMA Piotrowski participated repeatedly in meetings with the department for diversion and ideological conflict of the KGB from 1971 to 1982.

In January 1983, together with 3 another SB officers, he kidnapped and burned with corrosive liquid Janusz Krupski.

With inspiration from direct superior Adam Pietruszko, together with 2 another SB officers, Waldemar Chmielewski and Leszek Pękala, he carried out the kidnapping and assassination of Father Jerzy Popiełuszko on 19 October 1984, in which he played the lead role.

Arrested on 23 October 1984, he was sentenced to 25 years imprisonment by the Provincial Court of Toruń on 7 February 1985. By the way of amnesty, the punishment was then reduced to 15 years. In the 1990s, the courts denied him parole. The punishment was completed on 16 August 2001.

On October 4, 2002, he was sentenced by the territory Court in Łódź to 8 months imprisonment for insulting courts and judges in a tv interview given at a conference promoting the fresh anti-cleric weekly “Facts and Myths” in 2000.

Upon his release from prison, Piotrowski was assigned cooperation with the weekly “Facts and Myths”, where he was to print texts under the pseudonym Sławomir Janisz. In 2005, appearing under that name, he was recognized by a brother murdered in 2003 by Krzysztof Gotowski. He was later to usage the pseudonyms Dominika Nagel and Anna Tarczyńska.

Roman Kotliński stated in the weekly paper that he never employed Piotrowski.

In 2011, the paper "Rzeczpospolita" stated that Piotrowski writes for a weekly magazine under the names Anna Tarczyńska and Dominika Nagel, but the money for this work goes to his wife Janina P. The editor-in-chief of the weekly magazine accused the author of the article of a lie and announced the trial, which did not happen.

Who truly was Piotrovski's grhegor?

To answer this question, you must go back to the memorable summertime of 1982 erstwhile Captain SB went on vacation to Bulgaria. According to notes preserved in the IPN (by Trafalski and Piątek based on the accounts of witnesses and SBs known Piotrowski) on the Romanian-Bulgarian border, he met briefly with a KGB officer who introduced himself with a pseudonym Stanislaw And he started working with him. During the “Trouń Process”, Adam Pietruszka spoke about this, but the court did not believe his testimony. The paper has been preserved in IPN "Exit and arrivals in 1971 – 1989 employees of Department IV". It follows that officials of the IV Department of the MSW regularly went to meetings with the representatives of the 5th Board of the KGB (this board was liable for combating diversion and ideological struggle). These meetings were held in Moscow and Czechoslovakia. Piotrowski participated in them. This is confirmed by detailed reports from these meetings. Importantly, no notes from Piotrowski from another meetings with the KGB were preserved – even from the terrible gathering in 1982. If Trafalski's and Five's findings are actual – this means that Piotrowski contacted the KGB without the cognition of his superiors, which in turn means that Russian peculiar services had their agent in the immediate vicinity of Kiszczak. In this situation, Kiszczak, who decided that the murderers of the priest would go to prison for long years, designated to carry out Piotrowski's crime, eliminated a abroad intelligence plug in his surroundings.

QUICK HAKI — STANISLAW OF CUT IN SB ACTION

According to archival papers of the Ministry of the Interior collected during the investigation of the Lublin IPN, 3 operations were undertaken in 1984 – “Theresa”, “Traw” and “Robot”. Their goal was to surveillance the convicts and their families and to prevent them from denying even the fact about the crime. The individual supervising this extended surveillance was Stanisław Ciosek – then Minister of Trade Unions after the transformation of the Polish Ambassador to Moscow, until November 2005 the chief advisor for abroad affairs Aleksandra Kwasniewski. Ciosek reports for the most crucial leaders of the Polish People's Republic of Poland have been preserved in the IPN, in which the minister informs in item about the behaviour of the convicts for purposes. According to the findings of the IPN investigation, Chmielewski, Pękala and Piotrowski visited the prisons of Deputy Kiszczak – General Zbigniew Pudysz. It was he who threatened and promised the esbeks that the ministry would not forget them, and for playing a hard function in crime to the end, each of them would receive a reward.

That's what happened. The 3 esbecs were covered with all amnesty for political prisoners in the late 1980s. As a result, each of them served little than a 3rd of the penalties (Chmielewski 4 years with 14, Pękala 4.5 years with 15 years). In addition, everyone went on passes very often). In contrast, the word of stay in prison for all 4 esbeks sentenced in Toruń is included in the internship, so that they can inactive collect hotel pensions for this period. This is an amazing co-incidence, for it has never happened before, or later, that any stay in prison should be counted as an internship. General Czesław Kiszczak personally approved this decision in 1990.

All this shocking information was discovered by IPN prosecutors.

THE PIOTROW GRIGER REPORT

Among all those convicted, the biggest prize was to be awarded to Grzegorz Piotrowski. Piotrowski's behaviour indicates that he initially believed in the hotel promises. He lost his delusions only in 1989 after another conversation with Pudysz erstwhile he realized that his cognition was becoming dangerous to him. During the next pass he wrote a study on SB's actions against Priest Popieluszka on respective twelve pages. Through his wife – Janina Pietrzak – he deposited respective pages of this study with his closest friends.

‘Most likely the explanation of Captain Grzegorz Piotrowski contained the actual version of events related to the individual of Fr Jerzy" – read in the February 2004 IPN memo.

As determined by the IPN investigators, through Pudysz, Piotrowski was expected to tell Kiszczak in 1989 that if he dies, the study would see the light of day. 1 copy of this study besides reached the Pietrusków apartment.

It's gone," said Rose Pietruszko to her son. This dialog recorded listening devices established in their flat as part of Operation Teresa. The tapes were taken over by IPN prosecutors.

RECOVERY — THE HOPE OF LECHA

CHRZANOWSKI – Sejmu Marshal – Kavaler of the Order of the White Secret Collaborator of SB ZUWAK.

THE function OF THE fact OF JOHN MARIA

In June 1990, the investigation into the "crime of the century" was taken over by prosecutor Andrzej Witkowski – then and present 1 of the best prosecutors in the country since the murders. A year later, after a tedious investigation, he intended to charge General Czesław Kiszczak. He did not make it due to the fact that Wiesław Chrzanowski, the Minister of Justice, took the case distant from him – in the 1970s a secret associate of the SB called “Zuwak”, in 1986 converted by the Department of First WSW (foreign intelligence).

The IPN prosecutors established that Minister Wiesław Chrzanowski was under force from Mieczysław Wachowski – Secretary of State at the law firm of Lech Wałęsa of the president of the Republic of Poland from 1990 to 1995 and Generals Kiszczak and Jaruzelski.

We tried to talk to Mieczysław Wachowski about it, but he refused to let the meeting.

Nor did the juridical committee set up in 1990 to analyse the crimes of the MMA aid explain the truth. The committee was chaired by Jan Maria Rokit.

It was to him that Rosa Pietruszko came in with papers on the case of Father Jerzy Popiełuszko. Rokita ran the colonel's wife in a vulgar manner, and he refused to accept the documents.

The Unknown fact About the Death of the Priest. JESUS FEED

It seems that 5 days before the murder, a priest was imprisoned and tortured at the russian military base close Kazunia. In the years 90 and 2003 – 2004, the investigation was conducted by the prosecutor from Lublin Andrzej Witkowski. He was removed from the case twice, usually erstwhile he was able to collect fresh evidence.

Currently the investigation is inactive being conducted by IPN prosecutors. However, Witkowski managed to establish many fresh facts concerning the course of events resulting in the death of the priest.

In a funadamental way, they undermine the full cognition of the execution of Father George.

The authoritative version of his death was a version constructed by the power apparatus in the Polish People's Republic, or more specifically his armed arm, or Ministry of the Interior.

ELECTRIZE THE crowdS

On the political stage, Fr Jerzy Popieluszko appeared in 1981-1982 as a pastor actively supporting strikers of Solidarity workers. His sermons during the Mass for his homeland were electrified by crowds. In a short time, St Stanislaus' church in Żoliborz became the mecca of patriotism. Fr Popieluszko was targeted by the SB in September 1982, erstwhile Department IV of the Capital Office of the Interior (SUSW) in Warsaw began to analyse the crypt. "Popel". The first effects of SB's actions proved to be mediocre due to the fact that it failed to get any crucial information. Meanwhile, Fr Jerzy's sermons increasingly showed hypocrisy and the lie of the communist system. In July 1983, 1 of them was reported to Wojciech Jaruzelski. usually the calm general got furious. He immediately called the head of the MMA General Czesław Kiszczak and told him directly: “Do something to him, let him halt barking” (these words are documented in the file of the case “The Grass” presently in the IPN resources). Kiszczak treated the superior’s message as a business order. At the gathering at the Ministry of abroad Affairs, with the participation of Zenon Płatka and Władysław Piestonia, among others, informed about the low effectiveness of the erstwhile activities in the case of "Popiel" recommended the improvement of an operational plan "to scope out" to the surroundings of Fr Jerzy. The assembly besides felt that there was a request for a priest to take supportive disintegration measures, hoping for a possible tense breakdown. From that minute on, all operations concerning Popiełuszko were under the direct supervision of Gen. Kiszczak.

VERBLE AND SENT TO THE VATECAN

According to archival papers from IPN's resources, which was found by the squad led by prosecutor Witkowski, the group of Captain Grzegorz Piotrowski from Department VI of Department IV of the MMA, liable for disinformation and disintegration in the Church, formally took over from the SUSW in Warsaw. In addition to harassing the priest by dumping illegal literature and ammunition into his private apartment, it was much more crucial to find an informant in the immediate vicinity of the priest. In February 1984, SB officers managed to registry as “Desperate” the individual driver Popiełuszko – Waldemar Chrostowski. “Desperate” could supply SB with fresh information about the priest’s activities and aid implement the strategical plan of recruiting a priest. The thought of recruiting Fr Popiełuszko – as an SB informant – appeared in the spring of 1984. Gen. Kiszczak, in the past head of military intelligence, was convinced that recruiting a priest would neutralize him, and possibly his individual could besides be utilized in competitions with opposition. In the summertime of 1984, in meetings with representatives of the Polish Episcopal Conference, Gen. Kiszczak considered that another concept of solving the problem of Fr. Jerzy, which could be accepted by both the government and the Episcopal Party, was to send it abroad. At the same time, Kiszczak thought that the optimal solution would be to combine recruitment with the simultaneous sending of Fr Jerzy to survey in Rome.

Sending a previously recruited priest to the Vatican would bring large success to Gen. Kiszczak. The PRL peculiar Services would place the agent in the most crucial place for all communist interviews – in the very centre of the Catholic Church.

And it would not be crucial to have his real operational capabilities in Rhym and whether Popieluszko would have real access to John Paul II or to his immediate surroundings. First of all, it was crucial that specified operational success would surely strengthen the position of Polish services in the communist block. The KGB did not have a valuable agentship in the Vatican despite its strenuous efforts. Czesław Kiszczak could so boast his success before russian comrades, which would undoubtedly strengthen his position in the Kremlin.

It is crucial to remember that the head of the MMA competed with the supervising safety camera of KC PZPR Gen. Jerzy Milewski, whose position on the Kremlin inactive seemed strong.

At first there was no plan to kill the prince

All these aspects were highly crucial to Kiszczak. Regardless of the actions of the SB to make a "verbuncle position", the head of the MMA decided to inspire himself the anticipation of sending a priest to Rome. In 1 of the talks with the Archbishop of Warsaw Bronisław Dąbrowski Kiszczak came out with the "unobliging" thought of sending Fr Popiełuszko to Rome, presenting this as the best solutions to the problem of an unruly priest. He besides suggested that specified a movement from the Church would surely improve the atmosphere in the relations of the government – the episcopate. Archbishop Dąbrowski presented the thought to the primate Józef Glemp, who did not accept it, but besides did not reject it. However, over time, the primate himself began to consider specified a move. The consequence of the subtle inspiration of Gen. Kiszczak was that in the autumn of 1984 both Archbishop Dąbrowski and Primate Glemp began to thin towards the decision to send Fr. The opposition expressed by Popieluszko in the hierarchs' talks on the subject, and, above all, the declaration made by the priest to stay with his “blacksmith” in church relations, could only be a confirmation that he truly should be sent abroad. The Polish Church assumed passive opposition alternatively than an open demonstration of political opposition to the government ruling in PRL.

From the above course of events, the Polish Ministry did not accept the plan to kill the priest. It was only going to recruit him and send him to Rome. Of course, the management of the MMA realized that recruiting Popiełuszko could be highly difficult. The gene knew that. Kiszczak, therefore, allowed in planned verbal actions a situation in which the priest would be brought to a state of "nearness of death", but inactive will preserve his life. This fact was confirmed in the evidence of erstwhile Department IV officers as early as the early 1990s erstwhile the investigation was first initiated.

PRIORITY

It approached October 1984. Captain Grzegorz Piotrowski's first operational task group was increasingly determined. The Hart spirit and courage of Fr. They could not realize the origin of his supernatural strength. Minister Kiszczak's birthday was approaching (19 October) and Captain Piotrowski knew perfectly well that the finalization of the priest's recruitment would be an excellent gift for the head of the Ministry of Interior. His superior General Płatek then wrote in his service calendar (recovered later by prosecutor Witkowski): "19 is coming and they want". The case of Fr Popieluszko was a priority. At the same time, Piotrowski and his people did not realize that the head of the Ministry of Interior had already ordered respective weeks earlier the surveillance of the full squad by the operational groups of the Military interior Service (WSW). Gen. Kiszczak had not trusted Captain Piotrowski for a long time, suspecting him of consulting operations with the KGB. Piotrowski met with KGB representatives in Bulgaria and Lviv. For Gen. Kiszczak, the captain's contacts with Gen. Mikhailov, a KGB resident in Warsaw, liable for russian actions in Poland were peculiarly suspicious. Piotrowski knew from his colleague Kościuk of the Ministry of discipline that he was being followed, but did not want to give religion to this information (notabene Kościuk was arrested and sentenced for revealing state secrecy).

Since the beginning of 1982, Fr Popieluszko has celebrated Masses for Homeland in the church of St Stanislaw Kostka in Warsaw.

The Last Holy Mass and the Burning

When it came to 19 October 1984, Captain Piotrowski's group knew that the priest was going to go to Toruń, where he was going to celebrate Mass for his homeland in the Church of the Martyrs. At the last moment, Jack Lipiński, the driver of Popiełuszko, replaced “Desperat” (Waldemar Chrostowski), who very much wanted to go with the priest. Since his departure from Warsaw, Captain Piotrowski has been informed about the location of the priest and has been in contact with the manager of Department IV General Zenon Płatek, who in turn informed Minister Kiszczak about the situation. In the evening, erstwhile Fr Jerzy celebrated Mass in the Toruń church, Captain Piotrowski and his companions sat in the 125p fire close the service church, waiting for the priest's return journey to Warsaw. The decision to initiate the action was given to Piotrowski by General Płatek. A fewer twelve meters from the church where Fr Jerzy celebrated his last Mass, there were cars with civilian WSW soldiers dressed in surveillance of Captain Piotrowski's group. This fact was confirmed in the early 1990s by 1 of the chiefs of the WSI to prosecutor Witkowski, providing journals conducted by the WSW of surveillance. erstwhile Fr Jerzy got on his golf volkswagen after the Mass, behind which he was driving “Desperat”, he had a real chance to escape from the esbeks waiting for him. But that did not happen. On the way from Toruń to Warsaw, close Górsk, a priest's volkswagen despite his opposition stopped in front of the fiat of 125p Piotrowski. The captain and his colleagues pushed Fr. George into the trunk of their car. Meanwhile, the “Desperat” with his cuffs on got inside, placing himself next to the driver. While driving, he succeeded, without suffering any injuries, allegedly jumping out of a speeding car. As he later established. Witkowski, the cuffs were pinned and allowed to be liberated from them, while damaged during the jump from the vehicle the naval field was cut off with a sharp tool. The jump from the car itself after the local imagination was carried out by the prosecutor Witkowski proved impossible at the velocity indicated at the Toruń process by the “Desperate”. The stuntman active in the reconstruction of events broke his arm and suffered severe contusions.

OPERATIONAL FAILURE

Meanwhile, the esbeks' car with the raging priest in the trunk was moving on. The first halt was planned in the ruins of the castle of Toruń, where a priest's rosary was found during the investigation. However, this crucial evidence was hidden in the investigation. During the stop, the torturers began to “soften” the priest with a stick. The next longer halt was planned in 1 of the old military bunkers in the Kazunia area. Here Piotrowski's people continued, even more brutally. In the morning, a half-conscious priest was taken over by another operating group. Captain Piotrowski and his colleagues returned to Warsaw angry due to the "operational" failure and full of concerns about the future destiny of the project. Meanwhile, the priest was in the hands of another team. Was it a counterintelligence or military intelligence group, or was it another MMA operation group? The evidence obtained in the investigation indicates "military" who at the request of Gen. Kiszczak has been following all the actions of Captain Piotrowski's group since mass in the Toruń church.
Captain Grzegorz Piotrowski's group abducted Fr Popieluszko in the evening of 19 October 1984 in the area of Górsk on the Torun-Warsaw route. They pushed the priest into the trunk of their 125p Fiat and drove towards Toruń.

During 2 stops – in the ruins of the Toruń castle and then in the old military bunker in the area of Kazunia – they began brutal “softening” the priest with a stick. In the morning, another group took over the half-conscious cat. The evidence obtained in the investigation indicates "military" (intelligence services or counterintelligence) who at the request of the Gen. Czesław Kiszczak has been following all activities of Captain Piotrowski's group since mass in the Toruń church.

WHEN DID YOU END YOUR LIFE?

What were the fates of the priest in the following days, and who continued to take care of him? The brutal process of recruitment was surely continued, not avoiding beating and threatening death. The clues besides indicate that on 20-25 October, the priest was allowed to stay on the premises of 1 of the russian units in the Kazunia area where the KGB exposition was located. During this time, respective tens of thousands of people of the hotel were searching the surrounding areas, with all the resources available to the Ministry of the Interior at the time. Permanent search for the crypt. "Search" and "Sutanna". Radio and tv communications informed of the disappearance of the priest, as if the power had completely not known what had happened. On October 20, law enforcement authorities sought the perpetrators of the kidnapping, while they moved in the MMA building at Rakowiecka Street. It was the first component of the lie from the Ministry of Interior and General Kiszczak.

What did the priest's contact with russian KGB comrades look like, we don't know, and we'll most likely never know. The body of the priest found clearly indicated that he was physically abused much longer than Grzegorz Piotrowski could have done with his colleagues. The findings so far indicate that Fr. On this very day, the doctor treating the priest showed up 2 individuals from the MMA asking what medications the priest was taking and what doses, suggesting that he was okay. A frightened doctor gave the essential information to mysterious individuals.

So erstwhile did the priest end his life? Many indications indicate that this took place on 25 October 1984. Doubts can only affect the time of death. Prof. André Horve of 1 of the Paris universities besides suggests the date after 25 October 1984, basing his view on the photos of the corpses of Fr Popiełuszko, which he obtained "Paris Match". prof. Horve besides points to many another injuries of the priest, which were not given in authoritative communications. In short, his opinion questions the findings of prof. Maria Byrda, who conducted a medical examination of the priest's corpse.

GEN. Kishchak – “Today Must Find Yourself”

October 26, people gen. The silage locates the corpse in Wisla for the first time. This fact confirms the evidence of 1 of the prosecutors who was ordered to leave and carry out operations at the scene. The priest's corpse was then extracted from the water and inspected by a physician, which was not revealed at the Toruń trial, then thrown back into the Vistula. The Head of the MMA Bureau of Investigation Colonel Zbigniew Pudysz consults on the public disclosure of the priest's corpse and further details related to the direction of the investigation.

October 30, Gen. Kiszczak arrives in a chopper to the dam in Włocławek, along with his crew and tells the search team, "Today must be found". The divers who are expected to exposure and extract the body are moving into action. The location and extraction of the priest's body on 30 October 1984 are besides a script in details constructed by the Ministry of Interior. It's adequate to mention that another dive squad exposed the priest's body in the water and another brought it out. For many more years, the divers active will be subjected to the force of Gen. Kiszczak. Even after 1989, many of them will be afraid to attest to the prosecutor investigating, fearing for their lives. The version of uncovering the body of the priest is complemented by the fact that neither Piotrowski nor his colleagues were able to find precisely where they were abandoned at the Toruń trial.

Dr Leszek Pietrzak historian of IPN “The Voice of Poland” No. 39 (23 – 29. 09. 2015) Toronto

IS THE president OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF THE MURDERERS OF THE PRINCESS OF THE POPE?

We've got tough facts!

The publisher of the weekly Warsaw Gazeta – Mirosław Kokoszkiewicz – found very crucial and shocking speeches by the associate of the Sejm in the 4th word of Zygmunt Wrzodak, who asked a question about the current president of the Constitutional Courts Prof. Andrzej Rzeplinski.

According to the erstwhile MP in the Ministry of Justice, there are evidence of Colonel Pietruszko, who was to attest in the presence of prof. Andrzej Rzeplinski on the subject. The murderers of Blessed Fr Jerzy Popiełuszko and was to say who wanted to kill Bishop Gulbinowicz!

In the context of the current attitude of Prof. Andrzej Rzeplinski, the disclosure of this information will be very valuable evidence with which man we gotta do. Prof. Rzeplinski – according to Mr Wrzodak he was to be part of the PZPR. The MP asked about this part of the life of the current TK president, but did not receive an answer.

We call on the Minister of Justice Zbigniew Ziobro to search for these materials, which are to be found in the hotel which he is headed by.

We're asking you plainly:

OR PROF. ANDRZE RZEPLINSKI through the years of the crime scene?

We present the full speech by Mr Wrzedak:

Parliament, 4th term, 107th gathering (stenogram p. 329) , 3rd day (07.07.2005)

agenda item 28

Appointment of the Ombudsman (prints Nos 4208 and 4257).

Mr Sigmund Wordak:

Thank you, Marshal.

High House! I would like to ask the Members of the applicants who ask to be appointed as an ombudsman to Prof. Andrzej Rzeplinski to say something about his political past, due to the fact that from the professional side I know him rather well. But is it actual that until 1982 he was a POP secretary at the University of Warsaw? And since erstwhile was he a associate of the Polish United Workers' Party?

Secondly, how does the applicant's MP mention to the 2001 message by the prof. that he resents the communist authorities from 1944 to 1950, that only 10 Poles were convicted of alleged murders in Jedwabne, and should at least 1 100 be convicted? On what biography, on what history, on what information does Mr. Rzeplinski base specified a unusual opinion?

And the most crucial thing is that somewhere in the beginning of 1990, Colonel SB Mr Pietruszka asked him to confess before the national prosecutor. A corresponding paper was written on this occasion in the presence of Mr Rzeplinski and the late Mr Nowicki. Colonel Pietruszko shows the full mechanics of the execution of priest Jerzy Popiełuszko. Colonel Pietruszka tells us who ordered the execution and murdered Peter Bartoszche. This interview was in front of Mr. Rzeplinski. What did prof. Rzeplinski do with this information?

Then Mr Rzeplinski, listening to the statements of Colonel Pietruszko, who said straight that General Kiszczak had him imprisoned due to the fact that he had to defend General Jaruzelski and Mr Kiszczak. Mr. Pietruszko agreed to prison due to the fact that the court was set at that point and the prosecution was set. And indeed, the conviction they set before the trial was given to Peter. General Kiszczak promised you a colonel. Pietruszce rank of general after getting out of prison.

I think this information is available to prof. Rzeplinski. prof. Rzeplinski, under these evidence of Mr. esbek Pietruszko, signed and these papers are in the Ministry of Justice. I met them this year. This is shocking to me, due to the fact that Mr. Pietruszka shows us who murdered and who ordered the execution of Piotr Bartoszche, as well as how Bishop Gulbinowicz and many others in the 1980s were to be murdered. These are evidence given in the presence of prof. Rzeplinski. And prof. Rzeplinski signs this protocol – I stress that.

What have you done with this information since 1990? Thank you very much.

(Applause)

Who truly is PROF. WHAT IS THE HEAD OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT PLAYING FOR? Rzeplinski has disgraced the memory of Blessed Father Jerz Piełęska

TAKING CARE OF YOUR cognition OF THE MAIN communicative OF THE MORD OF BERTY

66-year-old Prof. Andrzej Rzeplinski, head of the Constitutional Court wants to appear as an apolitical defender of the Constitution. However, the prestigious functions are due to the voice of politicians of the Civic Platform and post-communists from the SLD.

The shadow on his image is the silent consent to impunity of the actual perpetrators of the execution to Blessed Fr Jerzy Popieluszka, by withdrawing the Helsinki Foundation from the monitoring of the investigation, as well as the companying of records by him in the 1998 Mirror Act, which protected the most crucial victims of the Peerelian secret services.

Andrzej Rzeplinski – Marshal of the 3rd Chamber – Guardian of the 3rd Republic of Poland

Read full https://gloria.tv/media/uDH7UaxLxDx

IS NOT A announcement OF A Crime CARRIED OUT?

Failure to notify law enforcement of a crime is punishable. However, this does not apply to all offences, but only those listed in Article 240 of the Criminal Code. What crimes? What punishment is there for not knowing of their commission?

A individual who is simply a witness to a crime or who has reliable information about the crime has only a civic work to notify him. No government requires people, under the threat of punishment, to inform them of a crime.

The exception is Article 240 of the Criminal Code, which indicates a number of the heaviest crimes which are punishable by imprisonment until the age of 3.

Among them are: