There may even be a majority in the European Parliament of lunatics in the medical sense," says editor Stanisław Michalkiewicz in an interview with Tomasz Piejnik.
At least Russia is behind any corruption scandals in the European Union. Even 1 of the Green MEPs admitted this. Does the Kremlin dictate climate policy to Brussels?
Not only did Russia bribe Euro MPs, but Russia bribed another countries. It started with Qatar. These Qataris, like the Russians, will not give free money to anyone. Therefore, they must have any benefits. I am a small amazed that MEPs are bribing, due to the fact that the European Parliament has no large power. He only passes resolutions against earthquakes. This is specified a luxury home for erstwhile politicians.
Not exactly. Legislative acts are discussed in committees and then voted in the forum and the European Parliament must be allowed to enter into force.
I say those Euro MPs who were corrupt were just mailmen. The European Commission has real power in the Union. I say the main corruption centre is the European Commission. Besides, there are specified characters as Mrs Vĕra Jourová, who already had a criminal episode just corruption.
Not just her and not just this Commission.
Yeah. possibly this is where the Commissioners are chosen. Headed by Mrs. Ursula von der Leyen, who appears to have been interrogated in connection with the Pfizer affair.
Before that, she had specified scrapes due to the fact that she was suspected of specified acts as the Minister of Defence of Germany.
The ancient Romans have already observed that there is no gate that a golden donkey cannot pass. There are rather a number of specified gates in the European Union. Corruption is the regulation of governance. At the moment, we see clearly expanding from the German side, which usage the institutions of the European Union mastered by the various German Shepherds to discipline Bantustan Members so that, in fact, it is included in the coalition agreement of the 3 parties forming the current German Government, the European Union becomes a national state. This has already been decided in the Maastricht Treaty and is consistently, patiently and methodically implemented. The politician of the state says he's against building the 4th Reich, but that's not true. After all, in 2021, with the aid of parliamentary clubs of the Left, due to the fact that even his own group rebelled partly, he pushed through the ratification of the decision [Council] on the own resources of the European Union, which provided the European Commission with 2 fresh powers. Power to make financial commitments on behalf of the Union as a full and power to impose Union taxes. This is simply a milestone towards the construction of the 4th Reich. Then why should we take the various declarations of the warden seriously? He goes to impudence, saying that this year's elections will be elections between independency and slavery. What else did he do to us? After all, in 2003, he, like Donald Tusk, was behind Anszlus. In 2008, he was in favour of ratifying the Treaty of Lisbon, which amputated Poland a powerful part of sovereignty. These 3 examples are most likely enough.
The bribery scandals in the European Union have been happening for a long time, and this has late multiplied a lot. Do you agree that this is what all EU policies are based on?
In democracy corruption is not a pathological margin, it is the rule of governance itself. The European Union is besides so conceived. For what is the peaceful unification of Europe? By bribing bureaucratic gangs to get them to quit state sovereignty for the 4th Reich. Hitler tried to force it, but it failed, and the full nations hated the Germans. After the war, Germany came up with an excellent thought to build the 4th Reich by peaceful unification, i.e. bribing bureaucratic gangs that run individual bantushans. The European Union is sitting on little than 2% of GDP. And how effective it is. This is simply a masterpiece.
In my opinion, this is not about the money from the European Union budget. It is simply a regulation which may have nothing to do with the Union budget. Regulations that make 1 company a day can gain billions across the Union market.
Very possible. Only due to the fact that we were talking about corruption, I am saying that the European Union is built on corruption as a rule of functioning. If individual believed that Germany would drain its own taxpayers for years to satisfy Greece, Poland, Slovakia or Romania, I cannot forbid them to believe it, but I do not believe it myself. Germany treats the construction of the European Union as an investment that must at any point start to turn around. This minute has just come.
Coking coal for steel production Brussels considered natural materialstrategic. Meanwhile, the EU methane regulation de facto eliminates coal mines in the EU, including coking coal. Looks like a divided personality.
Not the divided personality. And any of them, and any of the corrupt funds they've spent on bribing commissioners, they're the ones that's going from wall to wall.
Further EU regulations shut down hard coal mines, coal energy, ban heating houses with solid fuels, taxation combustion cars, and yet destruct them from the marketplace and force homeowners into costly thermomodernisation. Who is behind the Green Revolution in the European Union?
Two groups, I think. The first group is crazy. In the European Union, and especially in the European Parliament, there are more crazy people in the medical sense than anywhere else. It could even be the majority. They truly believe in all these ecological farts. The second group are smart guys who usage this naive belief of madmen in ecological rhizomes to train full nations. This is aimed at forcing weak and stupid countries to quit those energy sources they have, on things that they don't have, and that individual will sale to them. It's as simple as building a cepa, but it can't be said directly, so it's said that you gotta save the planet, you advance emotionally unstable girls like Greta Thunberg. She was now nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize. This shows that “You're the wisest leader. for Heads”, as Boy-Żeleński wrote.
Germany made volts on the EU ban on combustion cars after 2035. Which option will yet win?
I fear – according to Murphi's law – if something bad happens, it will happen. According to authoritative medical statistics, there are 20 percent crazy people in Poland. I think these statistic are understated due to the fact that quite a few crazy people aren't diagnosed at all. They don't think they're crazy, and they're not going to investigate. If democracy persists for a while, and this percent of crazy people grow, and it will, due to the fact that even the educational strategy is conducive to it, then at any point crazy people in democracy will take over political power and we will be in the power of crazy people.
The Polish government agrees to implement alleged milestones and another regulations imposed by the EU, which will turn our lives upside down and hit us financially. To this end, it besides rapidly amends the laws, so that only in the end Brussels will give loans and subsidies to KPO. It seems that this money is needed not so much to society as to politicians – to have something to give and to steal. Would it not be better for Poles to quit all EU money completely and thus not be subject to EU blackmail?
Very possible. Smart people do that. Switzerland is simply a small more serious than Poland. Although there were sleazes for her to join the European Union, she did not due to the fact that she does not want to. But this had to be thought of in 2003, erstwhile the accession referendum was. I told you at the time that Switzerland didn't want to. The supporters of Anszlus said, "This is different due to the fact that Switzerland is simply a rich country." I replied, “Yes, it is simply a rich country, but not due to the fact that it has written down somewhere and it has fallen into a rain of gold, just due to the fact that it is governed by reasonableness.” Well, then let's regulation wisely, too. The method of bribing bureaucratic gangs has proved very effective. You pointed out that these milestones are turning our lives upside down. This is an analogy with the 18th century. What was the aim of the possessive states in Poland, mainly Prussia and Russia? To bring Poland to a state of full overpowerment. It's the same thing right now. Let me give you 2 examples. In this expression of unconditional surrender of Poland on the issue of the regulation of law, which took the form of an amendment of the ultimate Court Act, it is recorded that independency is being tested, i.e. that 1 justice may competition the authenticity of the another judge, and if he effectively does so, all judgments with the participation of that justice are invalid. due to the fact that he's not a judge, he's a disguise. There's gonna be a whorehouse squared.
Second thing: the last judgement of the TEU on the anticipation of the decision of the forest administration in Poland being appealed to by environmental organizations to court. This will lead to the decision of courts that do not know how to organize the forest. The courts know how to drink and bite and corrupt themselves, but not erstwhile arranging a forest. And they're the ones to decide. There will be complete overpowering of the forest administration. The key figure here is Prime Minister Mateusz Morawiecki. In 1989, he was registered by the Energy Stasi as a secret associate. [This information was revealed in 2022 by Leszek Szymowski, and on 13 December 2022 a question about this substance was raised publically by Grzegorz Braun, associate of the Parliament. This issue remained without comment of the individual afraid – ed.] As all Stasi's assets were taken over by the BND after German unification, this case could have continued. I don't know if she did, but she could have. delight note what Prime Minister Morawiecki is doing. He agreed to all of this: and the conditional mechanism, and decarbonization. In short, a German agent couldn't have done anything better. but he's covering these concessions with specified a thrombin rhetoric. But let's not be fooled by this tromadradic rhetoric. Let's see what he's truly doing.
They are being revealed to Poles (but besides to another EU nations) increasingly absurd and conflicting with common sense mainly "green" EU ideas. Isn't that how you test the end of our endurance?
I was talking about training. On the 1 hand, crazy people, on the other, trainers. All mankind is being trained. The epidemic was an excellent excuse for training. Defending the planet from global warming is besides an excellent excuse for training, and I don't think that's the last word yet and there will be another.
Given all the harmful EU regulations we are talking about, do you not think that what Brussels serves us is much worse than the governments of the PO, the Law and Justice and the Post-Communists combined? They didn't want to ban cars.
It's comparable. Pretexts for training change. The Bolsheviks trained full nations under the slogan “good proletariat”. This argument no longer works, but quite a few crazy people believe in defending the planet from global warming and that it is the right thing to do. Why shouldn't they believe if Miss Greta gets the Nobel Peace Prize? They'll believe even more.
Is our membership of the European Union even worth it?
I don't think so. I utilized to figure out how much it costs to build highways. A fewer years ago, I found that for the yearly contribution Poland makes to the European Union, 500 km of road could be built. Including the acquisition of land under the highway, etc. Poland belongs to the European Union for 19 years. Then multiply the road 500 km times 19. We'd have a completed road construction program and no favor. With my own money.
In my opinion, the most harmful issue is not the issue of the EU contribution, due to the fact that it is only about 1% of Poland's GDP. It is much more damaging that the European Union interferes with the marketplace with its regulations, causing an inadequate allocation of resources. This causes much more cost to the economy than this full contribution.
Of course. Already Frédéric Bastiat in the brochure What you see and what you don't see He noticed that. You can't see what you're talking about. Nobody's counting it. I don't know how. Therefore, Poland's balance of membership of the European Union may be negative. Only there's no way to prove it. Furthermore, the remainder of the planet does not belong to the European Union, and look at how well it is developing. There is besides life outside the European Union. That's good news. Only that our bureaucratic gang has been so effectively corrupt that it no longer imagines life outside the Union. effort to choice up these apanases from all of these Euro MPs. life retirement after 1 term. They'll rip your eyes out.
Thank you for talking to me.
Tomasz pastry Pie Pienik spoke
Download sustainability report
"Janek, why do you choice on equivalent development?". SINGLE responds!
