So 1 could comment on the reasoning of the authors of the rotation call, which was published in the paper "Le Monde", and which was signed, among others, by the celebrated Trotskyist Daniel Cohn-Bendit and his sidekick from the 1968 Revolution – Adam Michnik.
The authors of the "appeal" say that: "A betrayal of Ukraine would be a death conviction for a European project". What does this “treason” involve? The thought that the triumph begins is that it should not be pointed to the only acceptable result of this war: Russia's withdrawal to its borders. 1 of the guilty popularity of this thesis is, of course, Donald Trump. Meanwhile, as demagoguery convinces the signatories of the "appeal": "The triumphant Putin would resume his wars against Ukraine today, but besides against Georgia, Moldova and the Baltic countries. The full continent would fall toward the abyss. Our security, freedom and values are straight at risk. So we must act quickly." And the conclusion: “NATO depends on the goodwill of the White House. The European Union is struggling with the indecision and fear of any Heads of State and Government, as well as the dual play of Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban. This is why we call for the mobilisation of all European citizens: if NATO does not rapidly take work for inviting Ukraine to join the North Atlantic Alliance, a coalition of willing European countries must be formed."
At 1 time, erstwhile Joseph Piłsudski was asked what would be like Poland would be taken in ticks from the east and west – he had the thing: "We will have nothing left to defend ourselves with sabers in Saski Square". It was a manifestation of sarcasm and circumstantial irony. Mr Cohn-Bendit and Michnik about sarcasm and irony should not be suspected. They live in the belief that they are absolutely right – Putin dreams of nothing else but Europe's "conquest". The fact that it is an obsession, testifying to the intellectual conviction of these masters – does not request to be convinced. What does it say? There are many reasons, but 1 of them has its origin in the doctrinal rusophobic haze of the Open Society Camp, or camp, which is George Soros. The current Ukraine is simply a task by Soros. It is no coincidence that people around Donald Trump openly say that 1 of the objectives of the fresh administration will be to cut Soros and his company off from influencing US politics. I think they know precisely what they're talking about. Camp Soros is now the biggest threat to the peace, stableness and social order of the full Western world. Not only does Donald Trump know it, but Viktor Orban knows it, Vladimir Putin knows it. Hence this hysteria and calls for the final throwing of Ukraine on a sacrificial stake.
Jan Engelgard
photo of wikipedia
Think Poland, No. 1-2 (5-12.01.2025)
