The panic in the UK is increasing! – Interview

The panic in the UK is increasing! – Interview

Because our lie-media doesn't inform at all, or tell lies about the situation in the UK, we interviewed Mark Collet, leader of the Patriotic Alternative. You will learn from the interview what methods the UK government uses to suppress protests, who supports these protests, and... how we will end if we do not wake up in time.

Editorial Magna Polonia: Looking at the situation in England, it seems that the native English have had adequate that a thin red line has been crossed. Tell me, how was it before? Was there a feeling of anti-immigrant sentiment?

Child killer.

Mark Collet: It's all been buzzing under the surface for a long time, and assassinations in Southport were the last drop that shed the bitterness spell. People must be aware that just a week before the Southport bombings a young soldier was stabbed in front of the barracks in Kent by a black migrant. These attacks are becoming more frequent, but anyone who dares to talk of them is censored and ridiculed. In any cases, specified as the attack in Nottingham last year, the government informs us that the attacker is “psychically ill” and will not go to prison; then the case is swept under the carpet—but not without the government's prior organization of the large day of “love” and “unity” to celebrate the city's “successes” in terms of multiculturalism. People have already protested before this terrible attack in Southport, mainly against hotels for migrants. Imagine— the government spends £8 million per day to accommodate migrants; Sometimes in four-star and five-star luxury hotels, while the average British endure from tremendous cost of surviving and conflict with the problem of heating their homes.

How do the authorities in Britain persecute patriots and those who are not afraid to talk about the consequences of multicultural society?

Girls murdered by an immigrant

People who talk and effort to organize themselves politically are persecuted by the state. We are faced with unprecedented censorship – we are not allowed to major social networks, we are hidden in search engines, our bank accounts are blocked, papers are created about us, but we do not have the right to give interviews in them to respond to allegations against us, and our written answers are edited to obscure our actual beliefs. Finally, we are regularly invaded and arrested by the police. I myself have been blocked by 6 different banks and I can't even have an account! another nationalists, like Sam Melia, were sentenced to prison for sticking stickers which, as police admit, contained completely legal statements.

Do judaic communities in Britain have an impact on immigration policy?

Yeah. judaic communities in the United Kingdom, specified as the very powerful and influential British Council of Deputies, regularly support mass immigration and call for a ‘pure road’ to Britain. These groups have a immense influence on the government, and frequently prime ministers and opposition leaders meet with these groups to get their approval before the elections. Moreover, there are powerful judaic financial institutions that support open borders; these institutions regularly take into account the leading politicians who gather to address their private events.

What are media coverage in your country? Are there any credible media?

As for mainstream media, there is no reliable origin of information in Britain. Even supposedly “right” media, specified as the regular Mail, advance the same program as the government, and although they will talk about the problems we face to calm and safe their audience, they always attack anyone who presents the solution – they always support the Conservative organization and even attack people like Nigel Farage. The most akin to free media is GB News, which is simply a channel on Sky and cable, presenting a number of people who talk freely about migration and breaking free speech – but of course they will not talk to real indigenous-nationalists.

All right, let's decision on to current events. How did the protests begin?

The protests began from the bottom up, there was no organization. People just started talking to each another on pages like Facebook and came in immense numbers to city centres across the UK. People were so angry that there was another stabbing and that again white children were killed by a migrant that they went out on the street.

How many attend protests and in what cities?

New standards for secular police in the UK

It is hard to answer this question – mainly due to the fact that our information comes mainly from the media. Mass protests were held in cities specified as Liverpool and Sunderland. But there were undoubtedly many smaller protests that were not reported by the media. It is hard to establish a real image of the situation due to the fact that information needs to be submitted from the media, social networks and independent civilian journalists. However, regardless of the exact truth, protests were large and widespread adequate to prompt the government to call on peculiar measures to deal with them. It can definitely be said that this was the largest wave of protests against immigration that the country has seen since the beginning of the century.

What are the main demands of the protesters?

Since the protests were not centrally organized, it is hard to say that there was 1 main postulate. On the another hand, I would say that all individual in these protests has advocated 2 demands: to halt the flow of illegal migrants across our confederate border and to deport millions of illegal migrants surviving in the country. For a long time, anger has been rising due to the alleged “walk by tiny boats” through the English Channel. The “Stop boats” phrase is regularly used, and people do not want to see these migrants accommodated in hotels in their communities due to the fact that it puts British children and families at risk. What people mostly want is that migrants do not come here and are not accommodated here, and besides that they simply leave.

How do police treat protesters? How many arrests have been made and have any convictions taken place?

Police treated protesters in a scandalous way – which made even the main media gotta admit that there is simply a two-level enforcement. The treatment of protesters was very brutal and completely different from the treatment of smokers from Black Lives substance in 2020, erstwhile police were kneeling before BLM supporters and giving them a free hand to do what they wanted. So far more than 1,000 arrests have been made, these people were immediately placed in temporary custody. Many of them have already been convicted in peculiar 24-hour courts, which have been created specifically for the examination of protestors. Convicted people receive the strongest sentences the state can impose – people are sentenced to over 24 months in prison, for simply yelling at police officers, waving flags of England or “gesticulation”. There were besides cases of people who did not even participate in the riots but were simply present erstwhile another protesters “behaved inappropriately”. This means a complete shift towards clearly politically motivated sentences and represents a sharp contrast with the 2020 Black Lives substance riots, erstwhile judges allowed smokers to go free after they attacked the monuments, desecrated the war memorials and even demolished them! Police are besides arresting a large number of people in raids in the morning, for publishing opinions on social media – specified actions apply even to children aged 11!

Do you see a chance that protests will actually change something? Will the authorities suppress them? You seem to have a immense problem with repressive laws and facial designation cameras on the streets.

I don't think the protests themselves will change anything. However, the state's reaction to the protests is so brutal that it caused Keir Starmer's support to fall by 16 points, and now it is referred to as “Keir with double standards”! In little than 100 days, the fresh government has become despised and hated in a way that no fresh government has experienced. The government has made a serious mistake in judgment, and many people are now affected by its actions, causing widespread outrage and even greater hatred of the political class. We have a serious problem with state supervision – and the police are now spending more time monitoring the net and spying on people than solving real crimes specified as burglary. In fact, the problem is so clear that any police forces have not solved a single burglary case in years due to the fact that they are so busy chasing “thought crimes”. Police now have very sophisticated methods of tracking people who participated in demonstrations, and they usage these methods to arrest anyone who was present on them – even if they have not committed any crime.

What is the current law on hatred speech, and what action can lead to imprisonment?

The current rules on hatred speech are being reviewed. The current rules are repressive, but there is simply a clear threshold that needs to be reached – speech must be “a threat”, “obtrusive” or “demeanor”. However, the government is reviewing the current government and wants to change it to make the illegal usage of speech that is “probably” calling for hatred. This means lowering the threshold to guarantee that people are more easy silenced by the threat of state persecution and imprisonment. The fresh regulations are supported by peculiar online restrictions, which are introduced through the latest Online safety Act. I have recorded respective videos explaining these regulations and informing about how they will affect both average people and the owners of websites and social networks that let freedom of expression. These provisions will fundamentally make a two-step state in which average people are subjected to strict scrutiny and observation, but politicians, accredited journalists and members of the establishment can say what they want without restriction. This kind of censorship is something to be expected in a communist country, but it is happening here in the United Kingdom – and in conjunction with an unprecedented surveillance state it means the death of freedom of speech and the introduction of an era in which “thought crimes” are punished with imprisonment. If people want to know more about it, I have 2 videos on my channel. Odysee entitled: Britain’s Digital Police State and The Online Safety Bill will KILL Free Speech. These films explain this much more in detail.

Thank you for the interview. Here in Poland, it is not so bad yet, but the current government is considering introducing akin rules. Hold on and fight!

Thank you for contacting me. I hope and pray that Poles will look at Britain and see informing signs – you must guarantee that your beautiful nation remains unified and resists both mass immigration and multiculturalism. Moreover, you must argue any laws that effort to limit your freedom, Otherwise you'll end up like us in the UK.