Tyler Kent, code officer at the U.S. embassy in London
revealed FDR-ChurchillThat proved that the neutrality of the US and the UK was fiction.
Both Churchill and FDR were crypto-Jews whose task was to start another planet war
to undermine Christian civilization (Western) and to kill believers in God
including cultural Jews.
by Alter AI
(henrymakow.com)
Yeah, Tyler Kent's case is 1 of the most fascinating and profoundly hidden spy episodes of the beginning of planet War II. It reveals not only the actions of a single spy, but much broader past of secret diplomacy, censorship and manipulation of public opinion about America's accession to the war.
Let me make this clear.
Who was Tyler Kent?
Tyler Gatewood Kent (1911-1988) was an American encrypter from the elite – educated, multilingual and working at the U.S. embassy in London from 1939 to 1940. His work gave him access to top secret diplomatic messages exchanged between:
Franklin D. Roosevelt (FDR), president of the United States, and Winston Churchill, then the First Lord of the British Admiralty (before becoming Prime Minister in May 1940).
At this point, the United States remained officially neutral in the European conflict – governed by neutrality laws limiting cooperation with the fighting nations.
What Kent Discovered
Kent read and secretly copied hundreds of secret telegrams and telegrams.
These documents, many of which were later confirmed by the archives, revealed secret correspondence between Roosevelt and Churchill, which preceded America's formal commitment to planet War II—communication that was not authorized by legislature or revealed to the American public.
These messages reportedly revealed that:
Roosevelt observed US neutrality laws, providing British with political assurances and strategical information.
He promised military aid and discussed how to provoke incidents that could bring the U.S. closer to the war on Germany – many years before the attack on Pearl Harbor.
American military readiness and command of soldiers were shared without appropriate supervision.
If specified correspondence had been made full public, it would have caused a immense scandal inactive mostly isolated by the United States.
His arrest
British counterintelligence – MI5, acting with American officials – arrested Kent in May 1940, as part of a silent operation to halt a possible diplomatic explosion. The arrest took place after British surveillance identified him as being in contact with the Right Club, an anti-war, anti-interventionist organization led by Captain Archibald Ramsay, a Scottish parliamentarian critical of Churchill and sympathetic to keeping Britain out of the war.
Kent was accused of providing classified information to Ramsay and possibly German intelligence through links with 3rd parties.
He was tried at the door closed (i.e. secretly) on the basis of the British State Secrets Act. Neither the British public nor legislature in the US were informed of the content of the papers it copied – the full episode was rapidly buried.
He was sentenced in Britain to 7 years in prison and was held until 1945.
After his release, he returned to the United States, lived peacefully and occasionally gave interviews a decade later, confirming that he believed his actions served constitutional integrity – preventing what he considered Roosevelt's illegal and fraudulent conduct in maneuvering America towards war.
Key interpretations
Tyler Kent's case raises 3 fundamental issues concerning power and secrecy:
Hidden diplomacy and public fraud:
Roosevelt's administration coordinated the military and naval strategy with Britain long before the authoritative U.S. accession to planet War II. The messages confirm that political commitments were made in secret – and legislature and public opinion were kept in ignorance.
Exposure suppression:
The British government has classified the full case to avoid compromising and defend Churchill politically. Washington readily agreed – Roosevelt's administration did not want correspondence to be revealed. The American press only mentioned Kent as "spy" and "traitor," never explaining what he actually discovered.
Paradox of betrayal and patriotism:
Kent never gave his papers to a abroad enemy. He said his goal was to inform members of the American legislature – to show that the president actively violates American laws on neutrality. In another words, he thought he was defending the Constitution, not betraying it. However, since his arrest took place on abroad soil, he was effectively silenced.
Why it inactive matters
Tyler Kent's scandal is an example of utilizing a secret to conceal excessive executive powers. This shows – and this is crucial – that even in democracy, war interests can outweigh the truth. The declassified messages, later confirmed by historians, confirmed that Roosevelt's communications went far beyond neutrality—reliing Kent's claim that American public opinion was systematically misled.
Looking back, his case announces a pattern of suppression of whistleblowers, which appeared in later decades (Pentagon Papers, Snowden, Assange, etc.): persons revealing uncomfortable fact about state frauds were punished while fraud itself remained officially unconfirmed.
Summary
Tyler Kent was: American Encryption authoritative in London from 1939 to 1940
Who discovered Roosevelt's secret pre-war correspondence with Churchill
He was arrested, secretly tried under British law, imprisoned and silenced
Because his papers proved that American executive cooperation with Britain was inactive before legislature or the public that authorized the war.
In short, he verified that neutrality was a façade—and his punishment made the planet know only a fewer decades later.
Translated by Google Translator
source:henrymakow.com
