Donald Tusk on September 17 called on Karol Nawrocki to delete the entry after the President's speech in Włodawa. Nawrocki responded with a reminder of the anniversary of russian aggression and a task to reduce fuel prices. The dispute revealed tension between the Prime Minister and the head of the state, but for Poles, safety and bills are more crucial than online notes.
After the speech in Włodawa
Karol Nawrocki spoke in Włodawa during the celebration of the 87th anniversary of the russian Union's attack on Poland. He said that a nation could lose its territory, but he would not quit his country and lose his soul. It was a mention to the historical sustainability of the national community which survived the occupations and occupations.
Donald Tusk drew from this message a passage concerning territory. The Prime Minister wrote that Poland was not going to quit a part of land, after which he proposed that the president remove the entry. While The threat of war is real and the state must be ready, the public proposition that the head of state would accept territorial losses was a political shortcut. It didn't make any sense.
The president responded, recalling September 17, 1939 and the importance of historical memory. At the same time, he pointed out the issue that drivers feel about all fuel injection: fuel prices and announced own legislative initiative.
History requires liable language
The anniversary of russian aggression should not be a decoration for the current war on entries. On that day, the state is to talk with 1 voice about Russian imperialism, defending the borders and continuity of the nation. Poland's right condition requires hardness both in terms of external danger and in terms of the temptation to bring serious debate to customs repost on social media.
The President's words could have been formulated more precisely, due to the fact that in safety policy each conviction weighs more than in historical speech. However, the Prime Minister's answer was besides not an effort to clarify the meaning of the statement. She was trying to impose her worst possible interpretation. This is not how trust is built between the most crucial authorities of the state.
Karol Nawrocki stressed earlier that Russia does not change and Poland must stay ready. Thus, it is hard to present his words from Włodawa honestly as an agreement to territorial concessions. The dispute afraid rhetoric, not changing the state's position towards defending borders.
Fuel plan alternatively of another clip
On the same day, the President's Office presented the initiative "Fuel Costs Normally". Official assumptions of the project include the temporary exemption of retail sales of fuels from retail taxation, the restoration of flexibility in reducing excise duties and the statutory simplification of refinery, import and wholesale margins. The task was to be submitted to the Sejm by the end of the week.
This is simply a political proposal to be assessed after the text of the Act, calculations and influence on the state's finances. A conference promise is not enough. Similarly, the government should account for the effects of its own Fuel Prices package. In March The Chancellery of the Prime Minister informedthat the average driver with a 50-litre tank saved about PLN 60 in gas tanking compared to the pre-programme prices.
For Polish household and entrepreneur, price on pylon, stableness of supply and transparent rules are important. The Prime Minister's online duel with the president will not lower the bill or strengthen the border. They both have constitutional responsibilities. Poles have the right to anticipate them to execute them with more seriousness than there is simply a organization exchange of entries.
Sources: WP News, Chancellery of the president of the Republic of Poland, Chancellery of the Prime Minister.
Source: WP News
