This post has been going on somewhere since July 18th, and in the meantime any things have come to my attention, and possibly it is worth paying attention to them.
Information from Interia 21 July.
In military language we usage specified a phrase as "stocks" (in this case: "concentrates forces") and the notion of "equipment and troops" can be called so, all the more so if they are prepared for a circumstantial planned term.
If individual has supplies in a cell (marined cucumbers, compotes, jams) or sand with salt in a box by the pavement, they can say that it is secured for winter and that these supplies will be kept completed in January.
It is absolutely correct form, correct in language.
We know, however, another cases erstwhile editors in the full article compose incomprehensible gibberish, usage quotes as a box, etc.
They're doing it for a purpose.
Right?
The editors, however, believe that it should be said, due to the fact that the reader may not realize the content.
Here we should consider further options:
- possibly the editor didn't realize the message himself and incorrectly stated that it was "plans"
The editor knows it's about supplies, but for any reason, he tells us it's about something else, he's driving us into the woods like any crazy navigation...
I announcement that the word "plans" does not fall into words, is the word "concentrates forces".
Here is the announcement from 1 side:
Is the editor on the bar with Polish??
Why can't any of the PROFESSIONAL editors correct the text?
Nobody sees what's incorrect here?
Isn't there a individual on a bug-correcting phase - a text proofreader?
Can't they afford it?
This page is just 1 of respective views of a truly large release.
We know, however, another cases erstwhile editors in the full article compose incomprehensible gibberish, usage quotes as a box, etc.
They're doing it for a purpose.
Right?
And below in analysis we see this example.
The percent of votes invalid in the 2010 general election - since erstwhile does human indolence strictly apply to the boundaries of the county, gmina, voivodship?
Patriotism in Polish. What is Polishness in the 21st century?
The vast majority of Poles think about their country warm only erstwhile it is good.
17.07.2024
Joanna Świdecka
The image of Poles, which emerges from the study “Poland in the 21st century. The types of national identification, their background and consequences" which is simply a summary of 2 years of investigation conducted by scientists from the laboratory of Political cognition of the Institute of Psychology of the Polish Academy of Sciences does not inspire optimism. The message that Poles are patriots turns out to be increasing up, due to the fact that 60% of our compatriots have, to a greater or lesser extent, a problem with Polishness.
Who's a Pole?
It turned out that the most crucial determinant of Polishness is cognition of language and that the individual feels Polish/Polish. It is definitely little crucial whether individual was born in Poland or if he has Polish ancestors. The criterion of Polishness, which received the least, was the Catholic faith, which means that the message of the Pole-Catholic is increasingly losing its status.
A manifestation of patriotism? The most crucial thing for the respondents is to show respect for the emblem, flag and national anthem, care for the native language, respect for and observance of the law and participation in the general elections.
What are “polskosceptics”? Very different from those for which love for Poland is only superficial, up to people who are ashamed or completely indifferent. According to the report, the surveyed groups agreed more with the statements: “Only erstwhile others appreciate my country do I feel full Polish/Polish” or “I can only interact with Poles who are like me”. In a word – if it is good, I am Polish. If it's bad, I quit my country and my nation.
On the another hand, 40% of our society is able to conclude that Poland is crucial to them and identify with it. These are people who are willing to engage in the country's life and take part in the elections. This group frequently identified with specified statements as: “Even erstwhile things are not good in Poland, my country is crucial to me” and “I feel a bond with another Poles regardless of what divides us”.
And there is simply quite a few this due to the fact that Polish society is becoming polarized. According to the report, about 1 in 4 respondents believe that Poles divide more than they share. – The research, but besides the regular observation, shows that Poles and Poles are dissatisfied with how political topics can divide and argue people. As a society, we are tired of the political divide and conflict that has been going on for years," says Dr hab. Marta Marchlewski, Prof. IP PAS from the laboratory of Political cognition of the Institute of Psychology PAS.
The past and suffering of the nation are important
What unites us and unites us? It turns out that the past – past and suffering. As many as 86% of respondents stated that the communicative is now needed or very needed, but only 45% declared that it was curious in it.
What about suffering? More than half of Poles say that we suffered like another nations. The fact that 43 percent of people are more convinced. According to scientists, this consequence may indicate a strong belief in the uniqueness of its own sufferings, which is partially related to national communicative and historical memory, which places large emphasis on periods of large difficulties and social losses. – People convinced that their nation was exceptionally affected may be more inclined to search hidden enemies or complex explanations for both historical and contemporary events," says Prof. Marchlewski.
Deep religion in conspiracy theories
Hence, most likely a large belief in conspiracy theories – almost half – that the government is utilizing citizens to conceal its criminal activities.
Conspiracy reasoning can besides be a defensive reaction to the situation of the own group, e.g. in the case of a losing organization for which these people voted in the elections. The biggest distrust of the result of the parliamentary elections held in October 2023 showed those voting for parties that did not form the ruling coalition. 28 percent of the polled voters of the United Right agreed that the election results were actually falsified. This thesis was besides supported by 24 percent of the Confederate voters surveyed. As for the voters of the Civic Coalition and its coalitions, only 6% of people suspected that the results could have been falsified.
A N A L I Z A
I've been writing this for days, and it's been resisting, due to the fact that actually, text only boils to repeating certain phrases - negative phrases, and "every" conviction negates the patriotism of Poles.
It turned out that the most crucial determinant of Polishness is...
A manifestation of patriotism? The most crucial thing for the respondents is to show respect for the emblem, flag and national anthem, care for the native language, respect for and observance of the law and participation in the general elections.
A manifestation of patriotism? - Why the question mark?
patriotism - The word means an attitude of respect, love and devotion to our homeland, and The willingness to bear casualties for her. The Patriot puts the welfare of his country above the peculiar interests of his own, his social class, professional group or party.
The encyclopedia of PWN defines the concept of patriotism as any love of homeland as the place of its origin and/or residence.
Patriotism is simply a cognition of the past and culture of their homeland and a concern for their behavior.
KO - in the 2023 election won 6,629 145 votes
On the another hand, 40% of our society is able to conclude that Poland is crucial to them and identify with it. These are people who are willing to engage in the country's life and take part in the elections. This group frequently identified with specified statements as: “Even erstwhile things are not good in Poland, my country is crucial to me” and “I feel a bond with another Poles regardless of what divides us”.
It's only now that any number value appears.
Deep religion in conspiracy theories
Hence, most likely a large belief in conspiracy theories – almost half – that the government is utilizing citizens to conceal its criminal activities.
Conspiracy reasoning can besides be a defensive reaction to the situation of the own group, e.g. in the case of a losing organization for which these people voted in the elections. The biggest distrust of the result of the parliamentary elections held in October 2023 showed those voting for parties that did not form the ruling coalition. 28 percent of the polled voters of the United Right agreed that the election results were actually falsified. This thesis was besides supported by 24 percent of the Confederate voters surveyed. As for the voters of the Civic Coalition and its coalitions, only 6% of people suspected that the results could have been falsified.
Conspiracy Thinking That's the question, What is the patriotism of Poles??
---------------
Polishness is simply a choice of heart, love of language, culture, history, pride of past generations. Faithfulness and adherence to the values recorded in the national tradition.
Poles as a nation developed within Latin civilization adopting the motto of God-Honor-Homeland. The foundation of this civilisation is Catholic ethics, and this means that being a Pole you must meet advanced moral standards.
Polishness is demanding, being Polish is not easy. We must do our work to our homeland and to our country, including at the hazard of our own lives. At a time erstwhile 1 is convinced that 1 should live lightly, easy and pleasantly it is hard to be a Pole.
Polishness irritates and annoys nature morally, weak people can't meet it, mean people will fight, mock, destroy. The Polish court can be based on its enemies."
- Gilbert Keith Chesterton.
www.rp.pl/opinie-political-social/art40821091-patriotism-in-Polish-what-is-Polish-in-xxi-age?utm_medium=Social&utm_source=Facebook#Echobox=1721193672
Skeptic - definition, synonyms, examples of usage (pwn.pl)
Right Eye: Cemetery Plague (maciejsynak.blogspot.com)
----------------------
Especially after this comment as below, the full article - and the survey - is for me - Untrustworthy.
The editors have already forgotten that in 2010 the Mazowieckie state on the board was all red in terms of giving invalid votes?
Or are they just not interested?
Then why are they in the paper???
Editors who compose about the Polish economy and society, and who are indifferent to the fact of non-government violations, should at least be banned from working in the media and companies, institutions that can influence the public opinion.
I pay peculiar attention!
The article does not mention what the questions were or how they were formulated. In many cases, no numbers were given. Only "inferences" and editors' opinions were given.
First the text to read, then the analysis
colour au original text.
reprint
Patriotism in Polish. What is Polishness in the 21st century?
The vast majority of Poles think about their country warm only erstwhile it is good.
17.07.2024
Joanna Świdecka
The image of Poles, which emerges from the study “Poland in the 21st century. The types of national identification, their background and consequences" which is simply a summary of 2 years of investigation conducted by scientists from the laboratory of Political cognition of the Institute of Psychology of the Polish Academy of Sciences does not inspire optimism. The message that Poles are patriots turns out to be increasing up, due to the fact that 60% of our compatriots have, to a greater or lesser extent, a problem with Polishness.
Who's a Pole?
It turned out that the most crucial determinant of Polishness is cognition of language and that the individual feels Polish/Polish. It is definitely little crucial whether individual was born in Poland or if he has Polish ancestors. The criterion of Polishness, which received the least, was the Catholic faith, which means that the message of the Pole-Catholic is increasingly losing its status.
A manifestation of patriotism? The most crucial thing for the respondents is to show respect for the emblem, flag and national anthem, care for the native language, respect for and observance of the law and participation in the general elections.
What are “polskosceptics”? Very different from those for which love for Poland is only superficial, up to people who are ashamed or completely indifferent. According to the report, the surveyed groups agreed more with the statements: “Only erstwhile others appreciate my country do I feel full Polish/Polish” or “I can only interact with Poles who are like me”. In a word – if it is good, I am Polish. If it's bad, I quit my country and my nation.
On the another hand, 40% of our society is able to conclude that Poland is crucial to them and identify with it. These are people who are willing to engage in the country's life and take part in the elections. This group frequently identified with specified statements as: “Even erstwhile things are not good in Poland, my country is crucial to me” and “I feel a bond with another Poles regardless of what divides us”.
And there is simply quite a few this due to the fact that Polish society is becoming polarized. According to the report, about 1 in 4 respondents believe that Poles divide more than they share. – The research, but besides the regular observation, shows that Poles and Poles are dissatisfied with how political topics can divide and argue people. As a society, we are tired of the political divide and conflict that has been going on for years," says Dr hab. Marta Marchlewski, Prof. IP PAS from the laboratory of Political cognition of the Institute of Psychology PAS.
The past and suffering of the nation are important
What unites us and unites us? It turns out that the past – past and suffering. As many as 86% of respondents stated that the communicative is now needed or very needed, but only 45% declared that it was curious in it.
What about suffering? More than half of Poles say that we suffered like another nations. The fact that 43 percent of people are more convinced. According to scientists, this consequence may indicate a strong belief in the uniqueness of its own sufferings, which is partially related to national communicative and historical memory, which places large emphasis on periods of large difficulties and social losses. – People convinced that their nation was exceptionally affected may be more inclined to search hidden enemies or complex explanations for both historical and contemporary events," says Prof. Marchlewski.
Deep religion in conspiracy theories
Hence, most likely a large belief in conspiracy theories – almost half – that the government is utilizing citizens to conceal its criminal activities.
Conspiracy reasoning can besides be a defensive reaction to the situation of the own group, e.g. in the case of a losing organization for which these people voted in the elections. The biggest distrust of the result of the parliamentary elections held in October 2023 showed those voting for parties that did not form the ruling coalition. 28 percent of the polled voters of the United Right agreed that the election results were actually falsified. This thesis was besides supported by 24 percent of the Confederate voters surveyed. As for the voters of the Civic Coalition and its coalitions, only 6% of people suspected that the results could have been falsified.
A N A L I Z A
I've been writing this for days, and it's been resisting, due to the fact that actually, text only boils to repeating certain phrases - negative phrases, and "every" conviction negates the patriotism of Poles.
These are negative phrases loosely combined into a gibberishy manner.
The image of Poles, which emerges from the study “Poland in the 21st century. The types of national identification, their background and consequences" which is simply a summary of 2 years of investigation conducted by scientists from the laboratory of Political cognition of the Institute of Psychology of the Polish Academy of Sciences does not inspire optimism. The message that Poles are patriots turns out to be increasing up, due to the fact that 60% of our compatriots have, to a greater or lesser extent, a problem with Polishness.
First conviction - 32 words, and counting each link is 36 words.
A lot. The average man remembers the last 5 words, the more words, the more illegible the content.
The image of Poles, which emerges from the study “Poland in the 21st century. The types of national identification, their background and consequences" which is simply a summary of 2 years of investigation conducted by scientists from the laboratory of Political cognition of the Institute of Psychology of the Polish Academy of Sciences does not inspire optimism. The message that Poles are patriots turns out to be increasing up, due to the fact that 60% of our compatriots have, to a greater or lesser extent, a problem with Polishness.
First conviction - 32 words, and counting each link is 36 words.
A lot. The average man remembers the last 5 words, the more words, the more illegible the content.
After the introduction, described as Image of Poles emerging from the study (That's six words! The remainder becomes illegible...), we have a conclusion (in a fresh sentence): Determination that Poles are patriots turns out to be increasing up
Do we remember the word utilized by Polish-language media?
"this Pole"
Who's a Pole?
It turned out that the most crucial determinant of Polishness is cognition of language and that the individual feels Polish/Polish.
It turned out that the most crucial determinant of Polishness is cognition of language and that the individual feels Polish/Polish.
not that the survey came out that According to respondents, the most crucial determinant of Polishness is, only that
foundthis phrase is universal, i.e. it can be applied in any situation and here truly destroys both the common and legal knowing of this term
This phrase denies what we know due to the fact that it refers to something What we know,
found - that is, something that had been set up before turned out to be wrong
It refers to something that it does not mention in the first words, so we automatically place that term, we aim, to that-- What we knowso what each of us understands from the concept of Polishness
if any, it should be: According to respondents, the most crucial determinant of Polishness is,
but we inactive don't know what the questions were and how they were formulated, so this conviction should be taken with large distrust
It is definitely little crucial whether individual was born in Poland or if he has Polish ancestors.
These are the impressions of the thesis that individual is trying to bring young people to memory
speaking of immigrants, or common German - Polish identity
The criterion of Polishness, which received the least, was the Catholic faith, which means that the message of the Pole-Catholic is increasingly losing its status.
That's gibberish.
The criterion of Polishness, which received the least - but at least?
That conviction looks like it's torn, like something's missing inside.
The proposition that the Reader would accept the gibberish by telling himself that the editors had broken something in the syntax, or that the text would be repainted?
So again, professional writers can't decently kind their sentences, abruptly they're indolent as if they're even simple school. not completed, and even after publication, they don't check on the website, what they published, they don't read again? Don't they see stylistic mistakes, deficiencies, cut phrases?
That's what they take money for, that's what they do, they're professionals!
These are informing signals.
A manifestation of patriotism? The most crucial thing for the respondents is to show respect for the emblem, flag and national anthem, care for the native language, respect for and observance of the law and participation in the general elections.
A manifestation of patriotism? - Why the question mark?
It looks as if individual was amazed that individual asked about the patriotism of Poles, in a guess - "if it is known that it does not exist".
Yeah? Is that how we read it?
should be
A manifestation of patriotism.
A manifestation of patriotism.
The most crucial thing for the respondents is to show respect for the emblem, flag and national anthem, care for the native language, respect for and observance of the law and participation in the general elections.
These things, they're crucial things, but they're a small extra and for individual who's just being raised to be a patriot.
Internet:
Was there a different choice in the questions, e.g. buying mainly Polish products, paying taxes, supporting each other, supporting Polish athletes, common respect and support, trust, service in the military?
And then again, babbling.
What are “polskosceptics”? Very different from those for which love for Poland is only superficial, up to people who are ashamed or completely indifferent.
What are “polskosceptics”? Very different from those for which love for Poland is only superficial, up to people who are ashamed or completely indifferent.
sceptic is unbelief
How does this relate to Poland??
We say "eurosceptic" and then this word means that individual brings us a fresh idea, the thought of surviving in the European Union, and Eurosceptics, those who do not believe that specified a creation is successful, alternatively think that it will be harmful to them, the main message of Eurosceptics is that - WE DO NOT KNOW IF IT WILL WORK, and if it is, whether it will be good for us.
Is he entitled to say “polskosceptics”?
No, due to the fact that Poland is Polish and Poland is not a fresh creation that individual is proposing to us, but it is simply a permanent creation, known, experienced by us, which has functioned for centuries.
WE KNOW THAT THIS WORKS, due to the fact that we and our predecessors have successfully experienced this. Whether limping or not - we have our own country, in which we respect different rights, while, for example, Ukrainians will not have, due to the fact that it was a temporary creation, invented for the purposes of German politics - attacking Russia and - who knows? - possibly Poland. And surely the goal of weakening Poland, which was realized in the 19th and 20th centuries...
What is different about foreigners - the Czech Republic, Russian, English, Norwegian or French may be “Polish-sceptic” due to the fact that he does not yet know whether Poland will be suitable for him, whether he likes it here, or whether he likes it - so the foreigner may be “Polish-sceptic” - Pole does not.
So “polskosceptics” is simply a word drawn out, which no of Poles use.
The word bears a clear dislike of the author of these words to Poland.
I presume that this is simply a German 5 column against the existence of the Polish state.
Very different from those for which love for Poland is only superficial, up to people who are ashamed or completely indifferent.
classic, I'd say, "sey" catch - with a comma moved, where the second part of the conviction is gibberish, I'm discussing it below...
Very different from those for whom love of Poland is only superficial
means precisely that they are Those who love superficially and are people ...something out there, you don't know what, 'cause the conviction is kind of ripped off. But it's most likely just about grading negatives, but the conviction is only about negative attitudes towards Poland and the word Very even more conquers the negatives (that's a lot).
if, after a comma addition, it should be
What are “polskosceptics”? Very different, from those for whom love of Poland is only superficial, to those who are ashamed or completely indifferent to Polishness.
But anyway, this conviction is misworded, it's inactive gibberish, in the first line names people
for whom love of Poland is superficial
What is it about, anyway? It's neither stylish, nor logical, nor anything.
It's gibberish, so...
It's just a turnaround. love for Poland is superficial - only and exclusively
This is brainwashing.
mentions only negative feelings towards Poland
‘polskosceptics’
love for Poland is superficial
Polishness is ashamed
They are completely indifferent.
This is brainwashing by repeating certain phrases
mentions negative feelings towards Poland and this without support by numbers
all wrapped in fancy complex and gibberish sentences
and does so at the beginning of the review of this research, so... sets up a reader? on further content
These 4 phrases describe a individual indifferent to Poland
And now we're discussing more specifically the choices of specified a person
According to the report, the surveyed groups agreed more with the statements: “Only erstwhile others appreciate my country do I feel full Polish/Polish” or “I can only interact with Poles who are like me”. In a word – if it is good, I am Polish. If it's bad, I quit my country and my nation.
These sentences in quotes are a recipe for a state disaster
If everyone utilized that kind of thinking, there's nothing to collect from the country.
and they besides act as negatives for brainwashing
in the second part is - in my opinion - the editor's malicious commentary, simultaneously repeating the negatives and pointing the way so indifferent, but besides simply - reading this text, a road that is called: quit your country.
Expression If it's good, I'm Polish. It means that individual is to take care of the state, not me,
The point is not to deal with the interests of your country, not to be curious in it
If everyone had followed this phrase - no 1 would have cared for the state and consequently it would have been torn apart by those who would have dealt with him, that is, by a abroad agent whose Polish citizens would not have disturbed, due to the fact that "taking care of you is simply a occupation and at all below my honour, let others effort as well as they can, I will be a Pole, if I do not try, I will leave you, it is simply a shame..."
And the media promotes this way of thinking. They do politics, they control the reasoning and behaviour of society...
A The state is like its own private farm - it should be taken care of and taken care of.
I would like to point out - it is always overlooked by the silence of numerical size - it is not known how many specified people there are, but I think there may be - 3 to 17%, but alternatively 3%...
We remember the poll I wrote on July 5:
The question is: ‘Are you in favour of the liquidation of the Republic of Poland by including its territory and its population in the national European Union with its capital in Brussels?’,
"Definitely not," 69 percent of respondents replied.
14 per cent indicated the consequence "not so", which is 83% in total.
Only 3% of respondents were in favour of resigning from the Polish statehood ("yes definitely" and "yes probably").
14%, i.e. about 4.2 million people - is it hard to say??
3% of 30 million adults give 900,000 citizens
I wonder who's on it...
And if you choose from this group 3%, or these 900,000 people, take of them, Let us give - 1%, i.e. 9,000 people and train them as journalists, place them in politics and universities in the first places - what image of Poland would we have in the media? On TV, in the press on the Internet?
What?
9000 people - 1% of "sceptics"
And then...
On the another hand, 40% of our society is able to conclude that Poland is crucial to them and identify with it. These are people who are willing to engage in the country's life and take part in the elections. This group frequently identified with specified statements as: “Even erstwhile things are not good in Poland, my country is crucial to me” and “I feel a bond with another Poles regardless of what divides us”.
It's only now that any number value appears.
This phrase On the another hand It seems to suggestThat the "first side" is as large as the another side...
Like I said, I think it's intercourse.
3% against Poland
40% for Poland
40% of our society can tell - is most likely a proposition that the remainder of Poles do not have intellectual capacity to measure the situation soberly...
In the second part, again, negatives repeated as part of brainwashing emphasize Poland is not well and What we share.
So typically for Verwolf: highlighting lying stereotypes and mythical "Polish hell",
which truly shows the presence of the German 5th column in Poland - dressed as Poles and sparking feuds and giving a bad example of Polish youth.
And there is simply quite a few this due to the fact that Polish society is becoming polarized. According to the report, about 1 in 4 respondents believe that Poles divide more than they share. – The research, but besides the regular observation, shows that Poles and Poles are dissatisfied with how political topics can divide and argue people. As a society, we are tired of the political divide and conflict that has been going on for years," says Dr hab. Marta Marchlewski, Prof. IP PAS from the laboratory of Political cognition of the Institute of Psychology PAS.
And there is simply quite a few that due to the fact that Polish society is becoming polarized - wishful thinking?
What does that mean? for everyone else, I'm just curious how editors counted and judged this "big" - we remember how the editor estimated that The German soldier's body was robbed...
Why compose about the fact that the corpse had almost nothing on him and that he could be robbed?
These remarks can be regarded as a proposition that the man who hid - the man mentioned above in his name - could commit an act unworthy - right?
And again, the author of the entry is another psychic who knows what was in his pocket erstwhile he died - and what's more - He knows how many people should have in those pockets!
What does "almost nothing" mean? For 1 "almost nothing" is simply a cap and a reel on threads, and for the another 2 100 gold is nothing.
Werwolf, peculiar services, and media, who pander people against the Law and Justice, for example, remember the political execution in Łódź...
Research, but besides regular reflection shows that Poles and Poles are dissatisfied with how political themes can divide and divide people. As a society we are tired of the political divide and conflict that has lasted for years
no topics
It's certain people on tv that share and argue people
We are tired of years of division and political conflict
But wait, wait, isn't that what democracy is about, is that people like hearts or dumplings and their options win or lose????
Are you negating DEMOCRACY??????????
This completely corresponds to what the German writer announced in December last year. Berliner Zeitung:
Shortly after winning the election by the “smiled” coalition Klaus Bachmann, a German writer surviving in Poland advised a possible fresh government what to do now. He did so in public, in Berlin Zeitung, so we could get acquainted with these advices.
“A reasonably unique global experimentation is beginning on the Vistula River, which can be a discipline for many another countries: a democratically elected coalition of democratic parties is trying to make the country democratic again utilizing non-democratic methods.’
It's not the dumplings or hearts that fight people, it's those who march with lightning in the streets, those who say, "This is the war!"
And those who fuel all this...
Because they do not encourage the opposing organization to the consensus, they do not offer from each another "We'll quit on this and that and that, to make a compromise with you."Do you know anyone who says that?
The past and suffering of the nation are important
What unites us and unites us? It turns out that the past – past and suffering. As many as 86% of respondents stated that the communicative is now needed or very needed, but only 45% declared that it was curious in it.
What unites us and unites us? It turns out that the past – past and suffering. As many as 86% of respondents stated that the communicative is now needed or very needed, but only 45% declared that it was curious in it.
Negatives again. It looks like bad will. Constant repetition of negatives.
This introductory conviction sounds like suffering n. is something desirable.
Because it's important.
Yet we do not yet know the context why it is important.
Well? It's brainwashing and teaching people that something bad is good.
Brainwashing.
What unites us and unites us? It turns out that the past – past and suffering.
Again as above - "shows up".
So the editor gives us a amazing conclusion (we presume that it is false, so it "shows itself", due to the fact that it is unexpected) and anticipate that in the further text it will explain why...,
note that the conviction plan has a hidden option - words "unify and unite" refer to words "history and suffering"Not us. Does the author of these words want us to always join together?
Is past suffering? Or is it brainwashing?
And we inactive don't know the context of what this suffering is about!!
The editor appears to us here as an oracle, which he knows better - due to the fact that we don't know any figures, first the editor gives us applications, and then slow reveals what about this suffering...
Nope.
He's not.
At the opening, he claims that The past and suffering of the nation are important
Then it's "surprising" and then it writes, writes, writes... but it doesn't explain.
It's a long conviction about history.
As many as 86% of respondents stated that the communicative is now needed or very needed, but only 45% declared that it was curious in it.
We inactive don't know what the survey is about!
So what if "only"45% curious in history?????
So what??
And why "Strength"? Why specified an assessment?
What is it? I don't know. Only NEGATION remains due to the fact that "only".
What if...
Or possibly it's about brainwashing,
As many as 86 percent of respondents said that they needed it or needed it very much, but only 45 percent declared that they were curious in it.
As much as 86 percent stated, but only 45 percent declared
Is that it? I mean, really, it's "only"45% in favor? By force to say that Poles do not want and are not patriots...
The author goes to suffering.
What about suffering? More than half of Poles say that we suffered like another nations. The fact that 43 percent of people are more convinced.
Well? How does that relate to the question that was at the beginning of this thread about past and patience:
What unites us and unites us?
What?
This text is truly hard, mainly due to the fact that it doesn't make any sense, all these sentences are brainwashing,
text only boils to repeating certain phrases - negative phrases, and all conviction negates the patriotism of Poles.
You want to know something about the patriotism of Poles, and you read negation all the time.
According to scientists, this consequence may indicate a strong belief in the uniqueness of its own sufferings, which is partially related to national communicative and historical memory, which places large emphasis on periods of large difficulties and social losses. – People convinced that their nation was exceptionally affected may be more inclined to search hidden enemies or complex explanations for both historical and contemporary events," says Prof. Marchlewski.
That sounds like talking to fools.
That sounds like talking to fools.
This consequence may indicate a strong belief in the uniqueness of their own sufferings,
It's truly hard to comment on due to the fact that all 1 of your own suffering just always we receive peculiar - due to the fact that it concerns us ourselves
43% - This consequence may indicate strong conviction
And there was - But only 45 percent declared that she was interested
So erstwhile 45% is worth almost nothing, because"Just"
And in a minute 43% are considered significant, because - I'm sorry. "strong conviction"
and even higher:
60% of our countrymen have, to a greater or lesser extent, a problem with Poland
and
86% said
This is simply a public mockery, Talk like a fool. and this is the best comment on this article.
These phrases are expected to lead us to the explanation of conspiracy theories - is this about Sinai and his blog???
Deep religion in conspiracy theories
Hence, most likely a large belief in conspiracy theories – almost half – that the government is utilizing citizens to conceal its criminal activities.
No explanations, no figures, just a cut-off text that suggests that...
I just showed that according to editors
45% is worth almost nothing, because"Just"
43% are considered crucial because - I'm sorry. "strong conviction"
Now about "nearly half" or Okay. 50% - says: "Mighty"
Again:
86% - Strength
60% - rod
50% - huge
45% -only
43% -strong conviction
And all this in 1 text.
This could besides be a graphic illustration with the ratio between columns:
"Mighty" is about the same level as "Just" and "strong"
and "until" You can even express with 26% difference...
Peas with cabbage.
Aren't they mocking people?
And it's in a paper called the Republic of Poland.
What is the credibility of this article?
None.
What is the credibility of the individual who prepared this, what is the credibility of the editor-in-chief who agreed to this publication?
None.
If a student in advanced school had written something like this as part of a Polish language class, he would have received a mediocre rating.
Or possibly even individual would start checking out how he got his graduation certificate...
Looks like we're already on the brink, 'cause they're no longer hiding.
Conspiracy reasoning can besides be a defensive reaction to the situation of the own group, e.g. in the case of a losing organization for which these people voted in the elections. The biggest distrust of the result of the parliamentary elections held in October 2023 showed those voting for parties that did not form the ruling coalition. 28 percent of the polled voters of the United Right agreed that the election results were actually falsified. This thesis was besides supported by 24 percent of the Confederate voters surveyed. As for the voters of the Civic Coalition and its coalitions, only 6% of people suspected that the results could have been falsified.
Conspiracy Thinking That's the question, What is the patriotism of Poles??
Opinion individual groups of voters Does the election consequence indicate a level of patriotism?
What's this investigation about?
It is public, in broad daylight, spitting on people, calling them fools and believers in conspiracy theories.
I propose to myself, erstwhile again, these phrases below you, take in and think...
And if you choose from this group 3%, or these 900,000 people, take of them, Let us give - 1%, i.e. 9,000 people and train them as journalists, place them in politics and universities in the first places - what image of Poland would we have in the media? On TV, in the press on the Internet?
What?
9000 people - 1% of "sceptics"
---------------
I'll effort to hold on to that and usage those phrases forever.
"Poland is not just a substance of being born a Pole.
"Smolensk year (2010)"
"Non-government"
disorder - German government
for fb:
Polishness is simply a choice of heart, love of language, culture, history, pride of past generations. Faithfulness and adherence to the values recorded in the national tradition.
Poles as a nation developed within Latin civilization adopting the motto of God-Honor-Homeland. The foundation of this civilisation is Catholic ethics, and this means that being a Pole you must meet advanced moral standards.
Polishness is demanding, being Polish is not easy. We must do our work to our homeland and to our country, including at the hazard of our own lives. At a time erstwhile 1 is convinced that 1 should live lightly, easy and pleasantly it is hard to be a Pole.
Polishness irritates and annoys nature morally, weak people can't meet it, mean people will fight, mock, destroy. The Polish court can be based on its enemies."
- Gilbert Keith Chesterton.
www.rp.pl/opinie-political-social/art40821091-patriotism-in-Polish-what-is-Polish-in-xxi-age?utm_medium=Social&utm_source=Facebook#Echobox=1721193672
Skeptic - definition, synonyms, examples of usage (pwn.pl)
Right Eye: Who is against Poland? (maciejsynak.blogspot.com)
Right Eye: Cemetery Plague (maciejsynak.blogspot.com)
Right Eye: German publicist announces force proceeding (maciejsynak.blogspot.com)
Right Eye: Poland under Non-government (maciejsynak.blogspot.com)
