You won't learn that from mainstream media. The content of the contract with Pfizer was disclosed for the transportation of vaccines. No, not in Europe. Here Mandarins do what they want, acting against our harm and gaining even more at our expense, and there is nothing to dream about the transparency of their actions and public finances. The billion-dollar contracts for our money are handled by the head of the European Commission through private text messages, which, of course, will not be disclosed due to the fact that they are private. As you can see in the photo, possibly very private. As early as January, any EU parliamentarians demanded an investigation, but they could dream, due to the fact that Mrs Ursula is much more armored than Marian Banas, president of NIK. It is worth reading about this case where we can, as our media do not overly divorce it. I'm certain not many have heard of this case, and that's besides bad. With the scale and impertinence of what the EU Mandarins do, the money heist is simply a tiny mice.
28 January 2022
16 January 2023
https://www.gasetarawna.pl/news/world/article/8637100,pfizer-contractual-von-der-leyen-pe.html
17 April 2023
The content of the contract with Pfizer was disclosed for the transportation of vaccines. No, not in Europe. South Africa. A group of citizens associated with wellness Justice Initiative requested the South African authorities to disclose the 2021 contract under the provisions on access to information. The government refused, so HJI in February 2022 went on trial. After over a year of legal struggles for his own money, while the government generously spent taxpayers' money dragging the case, HJI gained access to the document. You can find it at this link: https://healthjusticeinitiative.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/OCRPfizer-1_Redacted.pdf
The full past of the conflict for access to the contract and respective another activities of the organisation can be found on HJI websites: https://healthjusticeinitiative.org.za/
Observers estimation that both the South African government and Pfizer were hysterically opposed to the disclosure of the contract. Now you can tell the reason. The paper has 46 pages, but already a tiny passage from page 21 shown in the image above explains a lot:
The purchaser further confirms that the long-term effects and efficacy of the vaccine are presently unknown and that adverse effects of the vaccine, which are presently unknown, may occur.
Clearly, while in its confidential legal agreements the company Pfizer claimed that she is not even certain what they contain and how these injections work, we were publically assured that they were the best tested vaccines in history, not to mention the safest and most effective ones in history. Ninety-five percent effectiveness. Safe for pregnant women and children. Remember?
In section 8 on pages 23-24 a long and complicated enumeration.
8. INJURY
8.1 Compensation from the Buyer. The purchaser hereby agrees to the security, defence and exemption from liability of Pfizer, BioNTech, all their affiliates, contractors, subcontractors,
[...this is simply a long list...],
and the applicable predecessors, successors and assignees of any of the above ("Indernites") before any process, claim, action, claim, loss, compensation, liability, settlement, ...
And so on, another page.
Turning from legal to human language, section 8 of the contract states that if Pfizer is always sued by anyone – for whatever reason – in connection with injections, South Africa will gotta pay for Pfizer's full defence and then in the event of Pfizer's failure to pay the consequences, including compensation. Since South Africa, like most countries, consists mainly of its own citizens and their taxes, the agreement fundamentally states that citizens must pay for their injuries themselves.
And since South Africa has acknowledged and agreed that the injections may not work and agreed that Pfizer does not warrant that the injections will not harm people, South Africa cannot in any event claim that it has been induced to contract fraudulently or that Pfizer has supplied a defective product.
Reports coming from many countries where contract fragments have been revealed indicate that most likely all these contracts look the same. Now we know why governments are working so hard to deny that injections are dangerous, hide injury statistic and tell victims another causes of their wellness problems. They do so due to the fact that they do not want to pay for mass claims or endure the consequences of specified contracts or for forcing people to inject.
With us in Poland it was inactive mild, we avoided the mass compulsions of vaccination so common in countries of Western freedom and democracy. It is simply a fear to think about what would happen if alternatively of these disgusting populists there were lights in Poland and a pro-European organization of freedom proclaimers. Would it be like in New average Reich? Or like in close Baltic countries? We did it by mistake.
In addition, our government was rather clever in putting a message of supposedly conscious consent to the signature, so it has a tool to get distant with in case of a wave of claims. Of course, the question arises as to the degree to which this consent was conscious (false and incomplete information was provided or not provided at all) and voluntary (some professions, specified as physicians, were obliged to vaccinate, and it was besides hard to get unvaccinated medical assistance).
None of these followers of religion in discipline and following it without asking questions will have anything to say. Nothing happened, and with the next “pandemic” they will again politely put on masks and stand in line.
