When the planet admires, or criticizes Trump, the eyes of the planet effort to circumvent the lasting effects that American war has caused, not far away, due to the fact that in Europe. No 1 remembers that.
The North Atlantic Treaty (NATO) organisation launched a run of bombings against the national Republic of Yugoslavia (FRJ) from 24 March 1999 to 9 June 1999. During and since then, the prosecutor has received many requests to analyse allegations that high-ranking NATO politicians and military figures have committed serious violations of global humanitarian law during the campaign.
The criticism of NATO's bombing run included allegations of varying weight:
a) that since the usage of force was illegal, all NATO activities were illegal and
(b) that NATO forces deliberately attacked the objectives of civilian infrastructure (and that specified attacks were unlawful), deliberately or recklessly attacked the civilian population and intentionally or recklessly caused excessive civilian casualties, ignoring the rule of proportionality, trying to wage a war "without victims" for their own part.
The allegations concerning the war “no casualties” include suggestions that NATO aircraft, for example, operated at altitudes, which allowed them to avoid an attack on the part of Yugoslav defence and consequently prevented them from decently distinguishing military facilities from civilian ones on earth. any charges went so far that NATO was accused of crimes against humanity and genocide.
In addition to the review of factual information, the committee besides collected legal material and analysed applicable legal issues, including the legality of the usage of depleted uranium missiles, the legality of the usage of cluster bombs, the question of whether bombings had an unlawful negative impact on the environment, and legal issues related to the choice of target.
NATO bombings have caused any harm to the environment. For example, attacks on industrial facilities, specified as chemical plants and oil installations, were intended to release pollution, although the exact degree of this phenomenon is presently unknown.
The basic legal provisions applicable to the protection of the environment in armed conflicts are an article which states that "the methods or means of war which are intended to be utilized or which may anticipate to origin widespread, long-term and serious harm to the environment must not be applied."
In 2020, there were 49,043 fresh cancer cases and 28,107 cancer deaths in Serbia. The most common cancer in men is lung cancer and breast cancer in women.
Here is simply a more detailed list of cancer statistic in Serbia:
Capacities: In 2020, Serbia had an overall cancer rate of 20.4 per 100,000 people.
Mortality: The overall death rate for cancer was 128.4 per 100,000 people.
Specific types of cancer:
Lung cancer:
The most common cancer in men, accounting for 26.1% of all cases of cancer.
The mortality rate in men is 93.4 per 100,000 individual years, with almost a 3rd of cancer deaths in men being caused by lung cancer. Breast cancer: The most common chore in women, accounting for 27.6% of all cases of cancer.
In the Voivodine in 2019, a full of 18,779 women were tested for breast cancer, which is simply a coverage rate of 6.1% of the mark age group of women aged 50–69.
Colon cancer:
The second most common cancer in men and the 3rd in women.
Cervical cancer:
Serbia has the highest incidence of cervical cancer compared to another republics of the erstwhile Yugoslavia.
Only in 2021, 1085 women were diagnosed with cervical cancer in Serbia, and almost all 424 lost lives in this 1 year could be saved if the diagnosis were made earlier.
Stomach cancer:
The mortality trend declined importantly in both men and women between 2000 and 2015 and a crucial increase in mortality in both sexes from 2015 to 2017.
]]>https://www.icty.org/en/press/final-report-prosecutor-committee-establis...]]>
]]>https://www.google.ca/search?q=serbia+cancer+statistics&sca_esv=3acbd868...]]>
