Deputy talker of the Sejm Krzysztof Bosak
I have a negative assessment of the behaviour of Members the day before yesterday in the Sejm.
I am besides negative about today's decisions of the Presidency of the Sejm, consisting of large financial penalties imposed on Members who shouted their insults at the Sejm.
From punishment for insult and defamation is the court. Why should a common citizen wait years for a conviction and pay for lawyers in the meantime, and a rich lawyer from the ruling coalition should have his opponents punished the next day? After all, those who decree specified express penalties are liable for the collapse of the Polish judiciary, for the deficiency of any reforms accelerating its operation and removing current mess.
I have a negative assessment of the behaviour of Members the day before yesterday in the Sejm.
I am besides negative about today's decisions of the Presidency of the Sejm, consisting of large financial penalties imposed on Members who shouted their insults at the Sejm.
From punishment for insult and defamation is...
Furthermore, it is most likely a fundamental rule of the regulation of law not to be a justice in its own case. Coalition politicians taking wages from their opposition rivals, with whom they are in a toxic and long-term conflict, is simply a blatant violation of the rule of court independence.
If the Presidium of the Sejm is considered to be competent to measure the matter, then politicians should “disable” from the “judgmental composition”, draw any neutral lawyers, ask them for a legal assessment of the case and then accept and approve their judgement during the bureau.
PS Members may appeal against penalties imposed by the Sejm bureau only... again to the bureau, where coalition politicians have the majority. This is simply a violation of the rule of duality.
And utilizing the Justice-Bodnarist codet argument, it can be said that the Presidium of the Sejm established itself by a peculiar court, and the existence of specified courts is contrary to the Constitution, which means that the provisions of the Presidium of convictions do not have binding legal force, according to the doctrine of distributed constitutional control.
Does that sound anarchist? Oh, no!
Support Sławomir Mentzen.
Mentzen2025 tour. gathering information: Fb/SlawomirMentzen and == sync, corrected by elderman ==.
Entry The Bureau of the Sejm took on the function of a court which gives express punishment pochodzi z serwisu Confederation.
