Warsaw Sejm revised the penal code. 1 component of the fresh government is to change the definition of rape. 335 Members voted in favour of the fresh Criminal Code, 44 parliamentarians opposed, 47 abstained. The fresh government is in line with the demands of the hateful man, the far left. They are besides perverting the legal order according to which to convict, it is essential to prove the suspect's guilt.
The Sejm voted out a fresh definition of rape. According to the amendment, rape will be considered to bring another individual to sexual contact with violence, unlawful threats, deceit or otherwise despite deficiency of consent. It besides includes raising the advanced limit of imprisonment to 15 years.
The erstwhile definition of rape, which is to be replaced by this amendment, came from 1932 and read: “Whoever brings another individual to surrender to a fornication... is subject to prison punishment.”
It besides contains a provision that erstwhile a perpetrator of violence, a threat of illegality, deceit or otherwise, despite his or her deficiency of consent, or utilizing his or her inability to admit the meaning of the act or to direct his or her conduct, leads another individual to submit to another sexual act or execute specified act, he or she shall be sentenced to imprisonment from six months to 8 years.
Policy MPs, Confederates and Kukiz’15 raised doubts about the amendment. MP of Law and Justice Grzegorz Lorek stated that the redefining of the crime of rape shifts the burden of proof to the accused. According to him, this raises constitutional doubts as to the breach of the rule of the right of defence and the presumption of innocence.
“Even in a long-term relationship, it is better for a partner to make a sex deal with each partner. due to the fact that if she changes her mind, she will have a problem," he said. In his opinion, “if you do not have your written consent”, all proceedings concerning rape charges will be lost to men.
“New law is pure demagoguery, a gift for ruthless and vengeful women who will be able to usage this right to attack their erstwhile lover. The man is in a losing position in advance," he said.
According to Mr Kukiz’15, Mark Jakubiak, the amendment is flawed due to the fact that it will be hard to prove to the individual wrongfully accused of rape that “the second individual wanted too”.
In a akin tone, Mr Lumanovich spoke on behalf of the Confederacy. He stated that the fresh government would be an chance “to abuse and false accusations”. On Friday, all 3 Members voted against the amendment.
OUR COMMENTS: akin regulations functioned in the russian Union. The accused of anti-state action had no presumption of innocence. He was fundamentally guilty. and the complainant did not gotta prove it. The acquittal was only if the suspect successfully proved his innocence. This shows us how barbaric Tusk's far-left camp pushes us into.
We besides recommend: Belgium: Bishops convicted for not accepting a female to the seminary
