Nawrocki's housing scandal is indeed the pathology of the state!

Is Karol Nawrocki truly "stealing" a permanent site? Or did he simply do what the bans do all day – back without a pot and a stamp? The alleged locality example is not a long-term scan, but it is besides a bruttal survey of the native language: it is simply a preferred back marketplace for the selected, and it is simply a fair arrangement based on defiance. What would have happened if the state had yet ceased to interact with people?

The locality of Nawrockie – whether it is possible to make a difference in life and the country's network!

It deals with the site of Karol Nawrokie, the candidate of PiS and the typical of IPN, which, contrary to the conditions, is simple. What happened is an unforgivable occipital revision of the schoolroom will let for life. Only that it is carried out in an untransparent way, unfairly and emotionally overriding the trust of an older man.

In turn, he took over the village after his retirement, promising him protection. One, to establish an honest, notary contract for life – which in Poland is completely legal and available for each citizen – has chosen a short way. He took possessions, but – according to the protection – he did not supply any evidence. These activities are not voluntary markets. It's just a diagonal transaction of an uneven force and hidden intelligence.

Lifetime – the marketplace of free-to-air vehicles available for each.

In Poland, there is simply a full legal-instruction, which is precisely what he wanted to do, the second being made Nawrocci: he wants to live. It is predicted by the Digital Codex and can be formed between 2 physical groups. Emérite can transfer ownership in exchange for life-long care, maintenance, overhead, and in any cases on vet money.

The agreement must be made to include fresh features, due to the fact that it involves non-traffic – which will be an additional protection component for both parties. It is an honest, creative and – most importantly – available to anyone, not to the back of the banes or the foundations.

The reverse Himpotheka is simply a ban­king rel­tion reserved for the initiative.

With the second side we have the alleged reverse hi­composite kredyt – mochel – the reserve right behind for the instigation of the physico­ties, which means that the section takes money from the ban, and after its death the bank takes over non-ruchomity. This is simply a clean-finnish solution, without any protection, which is simply a separate resolution from 2014.

This is where the task is based: the country trains this second forma – the strict money – and I am going to turn off the bans. Primitively, they cannot legislate the "returned hippotheca" sen­te – if both sides want it voluntarily.

Problem not in mechanism, but in the context of reglamentation.

The free marketplace is not due to the West – it is simply a space where each organization can honestly make a free agreement, if the planet is active in it and voluntarily. The problem does not lie in the fact that there is simply a failure to pass for witness – only in the case of those who can do it.

The state has utilized a strategy in which the back-up of the favored investments – banks, realists, developers – have the possible for certain forg­ings. It is hoped that there may be a back-up activity in the roundabout, and that, under the threat of a prairie approach, will be fair if their investments are honest.

The left and the right – the common front of the hypocrisis.

The left-wing accrues the reverse hipothecary to older ones. The aim is to "transmit to the native property". Effect? It is not the backdrop, but besides the schizophrenic schizophrenic state: the country fort has made life agreements, but it is not the favourite of the large capital, but it has made it hard to make a fair living.

If Ka­rol Nawrocci had made a transparent life-saving agreement, it would have been transparent and inclusive. Thus, he chose a diagonal, non-formatic solution, which does not rearrange the underlying doubts, but besides makes it – rightly – in the fire of criticism.

The State was a full participant, not a guardian – the Bastiat was correct.

As Frédéric Bástiat wrote: “The state is simply a fiction, which will make all individual want to live with the cost of each other”. This is the example of how the country ceased to be a guide to the contract, and became a associate in it: regu­ing, conce­­­­ing and revoting all marketplace component – on the another hand, the most innovative one: the relation between the land and its property.

Until the State has returned to the market, it will be able to re-establish its own business. And they will not be the consequence of wanting 1 – but the consequence of a strategy that promotes intelligence, not transparency.

Grzegorz GPS Swiderski
]]>https://t.me/CanalBlogeraGPS]]>
]]>https://Twitter.com/gps65]]>