Encouraged by the good course of the experimentation with “safe space” to talk about vaccines, I will effort to do the same with Trump. I would like to remind you: I will keep an eye on the general culture of the conversation, but beyond that all questions on this subject are allowed.
I feel that any part of the Polish right hand needs specified a conversation. You didn't want to end up in 1 camp with people like Adam Johnson - The guy who posed for the photos with Nancy Pelosi's stolen mouthpiece.
He was so cheerful back then! At Pinellas region Sheriff’s Office (photo source) it's like less. It's kind of understandable, it's just, what was he reasoning about?
Adam Johnson, like Richard Barnett (the 1 photographed with his legs on Pelosi's desk), Derrick Evans (a fresh-dressed state MP who was trampling live), Larry Brock (the 1 from tritiques to tie up hostages) or of course Jake Angeli (shaman), did not hide his face during the attack. He was grinning to the cameras!
Now these gentlemen will have many opportunities to pose to police photographers. Without getting into their motivations, 1 thing is certain – they demonstrated cognitive impairment.
Apart from the issues of the left and the right, we all gotta reason in life on the rule of "Decision A will produce effect B". 1 thing is uncontested: these gentlemen have made incorrect decisions that will consequence in undesirable effects.
You don't want to have individual like that as a co-worker, due to the fact that the effects of his outlaw will hit you. Meanwhile, PiS has been building its abroad policy for years on an alliance with people like Adam Johnson.
Nothing can be built with them. due to the fact that even if you start, they'll screw it up. any part of the right hand must see this problem, let us make a safe space for it so that they can work it out.
I'll start with my socialist answers to the troubling questions:
WAS THE CHOICE FALLED?
Irregularities have been accompanied by American democracy for over 2 centuries. Americans even have peculiar words to describe various types of counterfeiting (I had a note on my blog about “gerrymandering“ I wrote about another words in my book. ”
There wasn't much of it in this election. Trump's lawyers had the chance to present them in court and in the Michigan Parliament – “star witness” Melissa Carone, working at Dominion as a cleaning woman has ridiculed them with a gibberish and vulgar speech, she will be liable for obscene behavior. Not for the first time, due to the fact that she was already on parole after an earlier collision with the law (why did Giuliani not find a serious witness?).
Trump's lawyers claimed that the key evidence was preserved at the end, for the mythical minute of the "release of the cracker". Poland's right-wing took a sip of it, which is most likely why president Duda waited for congratulations. He was waiting for a cracker. possibly he's inactive waiting.
The fact that “the evidence behaves at the end” can be believed by individual who knows the law from the series. That's what writers do due to the fact that they want a strong end.
When you file a suit in which you request specified extremist protection of your claims as the annulment of the election (or, in more mundane cases, the immediate withdrawal by the suspect from the sale of the “abibas” brand shoes), the evidence must be presented immediately. If this is not in the first letter, the court will dismiss it without consideration.
Trump's lawyers were happy to talk about these evidence at press conferences, but in lawsuits they wrote even (quote verbatim): "Petitioners do not allege, and there is no evidence of, any fraud in connection with the challenged ballot".
That's not what you compose erstwhile you're in danger of losing your rights for lying – and something else erstwhile you want to make water from Adam Johnson's brain or Andrzej Duda's. Why they wanted to do it, that's a separate question, unfortunately, for pulling a naive client to proceed losing a case, there's no hazard of losing rights.
They put down the TRUMP's account, isn't that tragic?
Of course it's terrible. I threatened it in a book that came out a small over 7 years ago."Internet: Time to FearIt is not known whether or not you are taking advantage of me.
At the time, I was told there was no specified threat, due to the fact that the free market. At the time, especially the right was delighted that journalists were no longer needed due to the fact that politicians spoke straight to voters via Twitter or Facebook. And in general Amazon allows everyone to become a publisher, and Youtube a tv star, yadda yadda yadda.
I knew it would end this way. Who wants to see the communicative about 10 years of my warnings, can click on the category “PCP/IP” on the blog.
From the informing now I went to the grumbling “I told you so?” (how much more pleasant!). What do I gotta offer?
Again, same as 10 years ago. Treating the net like "public utility" – taking cybercorps for execution and forcing society to regulate them.
That's how I see it as a socialist. Anyone have any another free marketplace proposals? Let him introduce them. I promise I won't cut it (but I can't promise to halt the malicious grunting).
WHY DID MEDIA MILL erstwhile THE ANARCHISTS movie THE STEPS?
I mostly don't like force and looting. However, the media cannot act without prioritizing the topics.
"The Stealing of a Capitol Speaker" is more crucial than "the Stealing of a tv from a store in the suburb of Los Angeles" for respective reasons. One: the last time Capitol was looted in 1814, and what's uncommon is media.
Second: due to the fact that government buildings are more crucial (the "break-up in parliament" is more medial than "break-up of glass in a housing store"). Third: due to the fact that the election of the president of the United States is more crucial than even the Mundial or the Wedding Travelling.
I don't like these media priorities either, due to the fact that it always comes out of them, that the most crucial thing is news about white middle-class men. erstwhile 10 people die in Paris in the assassination, it's more crucial than 1,000 people die in Cairo. I don't like it that way.
When I have classes with journalism students, I end up with the words “I have now told you HOW IT IS. How SHOULD YOU BE, is another subject, for another classes.”
I besides dream of a paper specified as "Object News From the World", in which all dead body and all assassination number the same. However, it would be highly costly to produce (it would gotta keep correspondent offices in all major country!) and possibly respective 1000 eccentrics would read it.
Including me, but are you certain you too, dear writers?
What about BIDEN BETTER?
I was there for Warren and Sanders. Biden/Harris is little evil to me.
The President, who pays taxes honestly and does NOT brag about how it catches abroad women for their crotches, is already better for me than 1 who does not pay and catches. So I like Biden.
