The Catholic Church opens to sodomites and polygamists?

The church where sodomites, divorcees, and polygamyists feel well, fresh secular services and the lesser function of a priest. These are just any aspects of the changes that will be the subject of a modernist debate at the October Synod of Synodality in Rome.

The Catholic Church goes further towards the heresy of modernism. On 20 June this year, Rome published a working paper on the Synod on Synodality, which will take place in October – alleged Instrumentum laboris. The full paper covers more than 70 pages. The text was presented in the Eternal City, among others, by Cardinals Mario Grech and Jean-Claude Hollerich. The erstwhile is head of the Synod Secretariat, the second will be liable for the content of the final synod document. Both purples emphasized that Instrumentum laboris is not a text giving ready answers; it is, as they said, a set of questions to inspire this year's Synod on Synodity in Rome. This assembly, pointing out, will make preliminary lines of consequence and will identify areas for further reflection, so that yet in the autumn of 2024 it can be gathered at the second part of the Synod about Synodality – and adopt final conclusions, from which authoritative conclusions the pope will later draw. Many elements of the text are completely devoid of content, speaking exclusively of the magnificence of the synod model. And there are no shortages of places that are refreshing and surviving religion in Christ. Unfortunately, that's not all. The paper is full of passages that indicate clearly revolutionary direction of synodality; the dream of building a completely fresh Church.

The Catholic Church plunges into a crisis caused by modernism

Point 23 Instrumentum laboris reads:

As a listening Church, the Synod Church desires to be humble and knows that she must ask for forgiveness and has much to teach. In any papers collected during the first phase, it was noted that the synod way is necessarily penance, considering that we did not always live according to the constitutional synod dimension of the church community.

The words "we have not always lived according to the constitutional synod dimension of the church community" are profoundly disturbing for 2 reasons. First of all, who and erstwhile did the synodity call "constitutional" for the Church? The paper repeatedly quotes various statements by Pope Francis on the subject, but no of them are infallible – these are not solemn proclamations ex cathedra. If the Church has never been authentically referred to as "synodal", why does the paper say it is? What would that mean, if there is inactive no – and the paper itself admits it – the definition of synodity. How constitutional for the Church is something that we cannot truly describe precisely? Secondly, how can we condemn the past for insinosity erstwhile synodity is simply a product of our times, literally: fresh years? It's strictly ideological. Similarly, colonialism is condemned by the criteria adopted by the political community only today. The church apologizing for its deficiency of synodality fits into the pattern of specified ideologies.

Unfortunately, everything is moving towards the complete demolition of the Church. erstwhile again, conventional conventions specified as Priesthood of St. Pius X.

Detailed task discussion can be found on the portal push24.

We besides recommend: Prigojin versus Putin. Russian civilian war or a clever setup?