On 26 July 2020, after the riots after George Floyd yet stopped, the CDC (American NFZ – ed.) issued a plan to make a national “quarantine camp”. Fortunately, he was resigned.
Biden's administration planned to establish concentration camps. 26 July 2020, The CDC issued a plan to make national quarantine camps. People were to be isolated. Only food and cleaning agents were planned to be supplied. They were banned from attending any spiritual services or even meetings with residents of neighboring barracks. The plan besides included circumstances to prevent suicide. There are no legal appeals or even the right to legal aid for detainees.
The plan's authors were not named but included 26 footnotes. The plan was authoritative and was not removed from the CDC website until around 26 March 2023. The paper was entitled ‘Temporary operational considerations on the implementation of a shielding approach to prevent COVID-19 infections in humanitarian situations’.
As we read in the preamble of the document: This paper presents considerations from the position of the U.S. Centres for illness Control and Prevention (CDC) on the implementation of a humanitarian shielding approach, in line with the guidelines presented in the camp documents, displaced populations and low-resourced environments. ...
The intent of this paper is to discuss possible challenges related to the implementation of the shielding approach from the CDC position and to focus reasoning on implementation in the absence of empirical data. Considerations are based on current evidence of transmission and severity of coronavirus illness (COVID-19) and may request to be reviewed as more information appears.
The nonsubjective of the ‘guard actions’ was to ‘reduction of the number of serious Covid-19 cases by limiting contact between people with a higher hazard of developing severe illness (‘high risk’) and the general population (‘low risk’). advanced hazard persons would be temporarily transferred to safe or "green zones" established at camp/sector level or community level, depending on the context and environment. They would have minimal contact with household members and another low-risk residents’.
In another words, this is about erstwhile concentration camps.
Who were the people to be detained? As the paper explains, these are ‘older people and people of all ages who have serious underlying diseases’. Who was to find the transfer to the concentration camp? Public wellness authorities. What was the purpose? The CDC explains: "Physical separation of high-risk persons from the general population" which had allow the authorities "establish priorities for the usage of limited resources available".
Sounds like putting people to death for their protection.
The plan established 3 isolation levels. The first is the household level. Here high-risk people are “physically isolated from another household members”. It's unacceptable. Older people request people to take care of them. They request love and companionship by their family. The CDC should never have imagined that it would intervene in households to force older people to stay in separate places.
This model shifts from households to the "neighborhood level". Here we have the same approach: forced separation. From there, the model goes back to the “camp/sector level”. It's different here:
"A group of shelters, specified as schools, community buildings in the camp/sector (a maximum of 50 high-risk people per green zone), where high-risk people are physically isolated together. 1 entry point is utilized to exchange food, stocks, etc. The gathering area is utilized to interact residents and guests while maintaining physical distance (2 meters). No movement to or outside the green zone.’
In addition: ‘To minimise external contact, each green region should include efficient high-risk persons capable of caring for residents who have disabilities or are little mobile. Otherwise, low-risk persons should be designated for these tasks, preferably those who have recovered from confirmed COVID-19 and are assumed to be immune."
The plan rejects thousands of years of medical experience: "Currently, we do not know if an earlier infection gives immunity, so the only solution is to minimise all vulnerability throughout the population."
As we read, concentration camps require ‘dedicated staff’ au "monitoring each green zone. Monitoring shall cover both compliance with the protocols and the possible negative effects or results resulting from isolation and stigmatisation. It may be essential to delegate individual within the green zone, if possible, to minimise movements to/from green zones."
People in these camps must have a good explanation for why they are denied even basic spiritual freedom. The study explains:
"Proactive planning in advance, including strong community engagement and hazard communication, is needed to better realize the problems and concerns of reducing the participation of individuals in Community practices as they are protected. Failure to fulfil this work may lead to interpersonal and Community violence."
In addition, there must be certain mechanisms to prevent suicide:
“Additional stress and concern are common during any epidemic and can be more pronounced in the case of COVID-19 due to the novelity of the illness and increased fear of infection, increased responsibilities associated with childcare due to school closure and failure of livelihoods.
Thus, in addition to the hazard of stigmatisation and isolation, shielding actions can have a crucial intellectual impact and can lead to crucial emotional suffering, exacerbate existing intellectual illness or contribute to anxiety, depression, helplessness, grief, substance abuse or suicidal thoughts. Protected people with serious intellectual wellness problems should not be left alone. They must be assigned a guardian to prevent further risks.”
The top risk, as explained in the document, is as follows: "Although the shielding approach is not a compulsion, in the context of humanitarian aid it can be perceived as forced or misunderstood".
OUR COMMENTS: 4 years after the beginning of the COVID-19 madness, this paper surely ranks at the top of the list of totalitarian social control schemes. It is simply stunning that specified a strategy may have always been considered. And that's why we don't know who made the document.
We besides recommend: Ukrainians desert during training in Poland
