Jerzy Owsiak, an eternal boy with a red nose and crayon in his hand, one more time screams that he has been hurt. This time, however, it is not about questions about the financing of the WOŚP, or about public confrontations with those who have the nerve not to kiss asphalt after its footsteps. This time – more serious: individual anointed his fence. Spray. Vulgar. Scandal! The media went on to fight: "attack for good", "traumatic experience", "speak of hatred".
Only before we start turning the barrier into Golgot, let's remember who Jerzy Owsiak truly is. due to the fact that not everyone who distributes equipment to hospitals (for the money of donors, not his own!), must immediately become the infallible guru of morality. And Oatsiak has been utilizing this umbrella of impunity for years. Shouts, insults, challenges. Publicly, with large power and even greater sense of mission. Of course, only erstwhile his opponent is individual from the "wrong side" of the political scene.
Remember erstwhile he spoke to the politicians of the right to “fuck”? How did he attack journalists who had the courage to ask questions about the transparency of the foundation? How did the crowd impose, under the appearance of “love and equality”? And all this with accompaniment of music and light to heaven. A sweet-bitter version of the PRL of the festival, but with a modern narrative: “If you are not with us, you are a vile man.”
And now that individual on that barrier has written out what they think – drama. "At risk", "trauma", "hate". Really? After years of scorning anyone who doesn't applaud the command? possibly it's just a right of reaction. Bad, rude – yes. But is it truly surprising?
Oatsiak was never “only” from helping. It has long been a symbol of 1 side. The symbolic frontman of the ideological establishment of the 3rd Republic of Poland, with strong support of the media, celebrities and this part of the society, which tears the robes apart in view of all scratch in the image of "modern Poland". What if individual doesn't want to fall for it? This is no longer a difference of opinion – it is simply a ‘hejter’, ‘crazy’, ‘a hater’.
No, I don't approve of scribbles on the fence. But I think it's time to halt treating Pork like an untouchable secular saint. He's a man with a mission – political. And like any man like that, it's got to number for not all to be his clapping crowd. And sometimes, alternatively of looking at the fence, it's worth looking in the mirror.
