Absurd alleged Clean Transport Zone. Simple example

konfederacja.pl 5 months ago
Paul Sit down On X.

Fiat Cinquecento burns 4l/100 km. Meanwhile, Boeing 747 burns 4l fuel per secunda! Guess which device cannot appear in the center of Warsaw. Of course, an economical car does not meet idiotic EU standards. It's another installment of the absurdity of the Clean Transport Zone.

Chopin Airport is located straight in Warsaw, it is closer to the centre than to districts specified as Ursynów or Ursus. all day hundreds of aircraft take off, and its maximum bandwidth is 600 operations. Planes burn immense amounts of fuel. In the case of Boeing 747 it is about 15,000 litres per hr of flight. What is older, frequently economical cars are worse than passenger aircraft?

Fiat Cinquecento burns 4l/100 km. Meanwhile, Boeing 747 burns 4l fuel per secunda! Guess which device cannot appear in the center of Warsaw. Of course, an economical car does not meet idiotic EU standards. This is another installment of the absurdity of the Clean Transport Zone... pic.twitter.com/M69KNcYetz

— Paweł Usiećek (@PUsiadek) January 8, 2025

It can besides be pointed out that the Polish LOT Airlines have 17-year-old aircraft in their fleet (Boeings 737-800NG), there are besides Embraery 170-year-olds. Nobody's come by yet to ban them, like old petrol and comparatively young diesel?

This is not, of course, a request to extend the Clean Transport region to include aircraft, it is an indication of the senselessness of these zones. What is funny, Tusk intends to grow the airport in Warsaw alternatively of building an airport from a real event within the CPK. And where's the fresh air?

Support Sławomir Mentzen

Read Entire Article