Renata Kim wrote in “Newsweek” that Simon Holovnia studied at the Collegium Humanum. He's on the student list, signed a vow. The holovnia explains that he enrolled in 2020 due to the fact that he decided to complete his education, but then he understood what this place was, and did not take classes. This was likely, as was the case with many another students of “Collegium Tumanum” – this was the specificity of the university that 1 could not walk, not count, but get a diploma. Just pay. However, Simon Holovnia, as he convinces, did not pay and has no diploma, which is besides rather credible, due to the fact that after 4 years at least a bachelor's degree in this psychology should be.
Education or the golden toilet?
The direction chosen by the marshal is besides to prove in his defense. There's no synecur for a degree in psychology. It's not an MBA. Psychology comes from an authentic desire to grow knowledge, not for influence or property.
The popularity of Collegium Humanum seems to indicate that in a society where the profession of a teacher is not prestigious and not profitable, education matters. Not a gold toilet brush (remember the protests in Russia in 2021, erstwhile Alexey Navalny showed a video from Putin's villa, and on it a toilet gadget for 700 euros?), not a bicycle journey to work, being the Prime Minister (this is the Netherlands), but "mgr" or "dr" which can be added before his name.
There is inactive hope that at a time erstwhile the media lose to social media platforms, flooded with bullshit, the belief is widely shared that it is fun to know something. And he doesn't know, he suspects, or he thinks. However, education requires work and time, and fewer people have time and space to check the authenticity of diplomas of politicians, so business ventures aiming at this niche are emerging.
Simon Holovnia most likely fell victim to specified a business niche. Anyway, Donald Tusk believes the marshal.
The marshal himself seems not to believe in justice. Asked by journalists He said he could sue "Newsweek", but the trial would most likely proceed so long that his good name would not be cleared before the presidential election. He felt it was besides worth suing Collegium Humanum for illegally turning his data. At the same time, he expressed concern that the information could have been cut from the prosecution or from the service. This in turn was powerfully denied by the head of the Ministry of abroad Affairs Tomasz Siemoniak and the lawyer General and Minister of Justice Adam Bodnar.
Innocent and hurt
Things are getting bigger here. The Marshal of the Sejm says that his only weapon is the truth, suggesting that the services and the prosecution are politicized, or how else to explain this coincide? Simon Holovnia announced that he was moving for president, Then came the candidate Trzaskowski, and then boom, comes the information from the investigation into Collegium Humanum. There are no coincidences, it's a false start to the election campaign, the charts set off before the launch of the race.
The Holovnia seems to think that the voters he tries to scope and wants to represent are innocent and hurt, the small ones, the smallest of the least, characterized by gullibility and uprightness, incomprehensible and afraid of politics, rivalry, games. Therefore, he is portrayed as Simon of Białystok, age 48. It doesn't show organization colors. He convinces that he is untangled and independent.
And now he's hurt. Unfairly treated by state services, so even more convincing, due to the fact that akin to those he wants to go to.
But Simon Holovnia is the talker of the Sejm.
After 8 years of PiS rule, during which the politicization of services was public and intense, the reversal of this process is surely not 1 of the easiest tasks and so needs time and a facade for which renovation work can take place. This facade is created by the authorities of Adam Bodnar and Tomasz Siemoniak, but besides by the behaviour of all another members of the government and parliament. The suggestions that Holovnia has not supported at this time with any evidence have tarnished this facade. The news that the services are acting as they did for the Law and Justice, on the political commission of the ruling party, is simply a major blow to the assurance of voters who, among another things, voted for the coalition on October 15, so that the services would act for the welfare of the state, alternatively than being the strong arm of the ruling faction.
It is appropriate to ask whether the marshal's reaction, even if the basis is the actual harm, caused by the actual talk, is proportional and responsible. Is it more costly for Simon Holownia to love himself, his own ambitions, and regret that he was so close and is getting farther? Is it more crucial and serious to rebuild the services and trust of citizens in the state? What do we anticipate from a presidential candidate?
Maybe it's besides bad the marshal didn't find time to finish his psychology studies.
