A survey on the veto of the Nawrock president's amendment of the education law on the improvement of "Compass Tomorrow. improvement 26" showed. that the responses of the supporters and the opposers were equal – 48%.
What does that mean? Not only about the size, as would be the consequence of the probe, the indifference of a large number of Poles towards the school and its impact on the young generation. Moreover, in the voices not supporting veto, the function of the supporters of Tusk and his arrangement could have been played by Dr. Nawrocki, which may have led to the vote being voted, not even knowing what the Nowacka task was all about. Knowing the “level of politicization” of most Poles, it could have been so.
due to the fact that I have been teaching for more than 50 years and the effects of the celebrated 1948 school improvement have besides affected me in part, so all manipulations in these matters rise my objections in advance. However, I will add that this reform, although very low in secondary education, did not in any way lay down the relaxation of school discipline or pave the way for moral relaxation or distortion of the educational model. Actually, it's the first time that Mrs. Nowack always had a chance.
Of course, her education improvement projects would should be confronted with global and nonsubjective cognition in this area. Meanwhile, as Agnieszka Paprocka states
(Post ZNP) TThere was no "veto reform" but a halt to ideological experimentation on children. Finally, individual separated the real affairs of teachers (wages, hours) from the programme chaos and ideology of the school. The school is to teach knowledge, not to be a groundbreaking for passwords and narratives. MEN plays narrative, not facts. The announcement of the press conference is simply a classical message management, not a solution to the problems of education. Lots of passwords, small knowledge, no work for the effects.
The president has clearly justified his position. stating that the amendment would lead to chaos in schools, ideology of education and "experimentation on full children's yearbooks". “The Polish school needs peace, cognition and stability, not thoughtless, chaotic changes that will request to be improved immediately after the introduction”, he added. He stressed that the proposed solutions, alternatively of improving the situation in the field, could make it worse.
Mrs. Nowacka has peculiar nerve and does not dress in words erstwhile she wants to justify her rations, possibly aware of their pettyness and substantive nothingness. It is worth quoting respective epithets in Nowack's performance on the President's veto. Here are a fewer of them: “I don’t think there was a stupider veto”, “gibberish”, “poor argument.” The President's consultation gathering assesses it as ‘Frequency’“antyvaccinating, quaziekspertami or ‘Ultra-right organisations operating against free environments’. It is characteristic of this individual that erstwhile there is no argument, the rudeness comes out.
Even Marcin Józefaciuk did not stand for this, surely not a measurement of the values of the president, but seemingly delicate to the foolishness of Nowack and Lubnauer. It states that ‘This conference was primarily a political speech, devoid of maturity appropriate to the function of the Minister of Education. alternatively of the subject matter, emotions, ridicule and divisions prevailed - aimed at teachers, schools, local governments and the president of Poland".
Without entering into the assessment of Nowack's activities in the field of education and education, we should pay attention to the level of her speeches and ideas and ask Prime Minister Tusk: what intent does he have in demolishing specified an crucial field as the Polish school? Is this 1 of the tasks assigned to him by the German-EU tandem to organise Europe's funeral?
It all points to the fact that entrusting education to individual who has no thought about education, and who is simply a believer of all kinds of ideological novelties and permissive upbringing in the form of threatening the upbringing of the kid according to his intellectual and physical development, only shows 1 thing: it is about preparing Poles for specified a developed Poland, in which identity, treasure of culture and morals acquired by generations will go to lame. Tusk, calling Mrs. Nowacka to the position of Minister of Education, did so with deliberate thought, due to the fact that not only the economical collapse of Poland – even though late we hear Tusk's mouth about the extraordinary prosperity in this field – but much more foolishness and depravedness of her society will bring Poland closer to the state erstwhile the rescue will be only in the European Union and in EURO – vide Greece.
Nowacka may be hulking like Mrs. Leschina. The second Tusk dismissed, but only due to the fact that the wellness Service under her direction was sicker than the ones she was expected to be helping. The fact that school children are exposed to toxicity, the consequences of which do not make each another wait, does not concern Tusk or those who support him. Today, it is apparent that all this machinery tampering with the sick of this state body is doing it according to the liquidation plan, and the fierce attacks on the president trying to suppress this process, taking the form of a simple hucpa, as illustrated here, or semi-inteligent fencing of phrases, as with Mr.Sikorski, who does not gotta bother to organize even a seemingly ambitious diplomacy, due to the fact that there is no chance, like Tusk. Both can see the White home or legislature either in a image or from an acceptable distance.
All this. Of course, it does not service Poland, but on the contrary it will sink into the European and even global political scene. But an irreversible threat for at least decades is what Nowacka does, while allowing herself to have rude and ridiculous responses to relations with the President, who does not even scope his heels.
