Chess with a pigeon or AS response

Saturday “Dispute” under my text “The Nation” proves 1 thing. Well, the ability to read knowing is inactive not available to many bloggers.

PI want you to treat it yourself.

I compose brightly like a cattle by a ditch:

The improvement of the modern concept of the Nation was beautifully described by Dr. Agnieszka Nogal Prof. UW:

The evolution of nations was possible thanks to 3 historical phrases. The first were spiritual wars and the adoption of the cuius regio principle, eius religio, the second – the connection of power to the collective identity, and yet the 3rd – designation that, like the individual, they should constitute themselves, so do the collectives have the right to self-determination – says Agnieszka Nogal in “Political Theology all Week”: “The thought of the nation”.

And that's most likely why I'm getting a ripost cut from that AS:

Creating national awareness and integrating the nation over the centuries:

Age X to XIII - integration of Slavic tribes by inclusion in Christian culture

The 14th to 17th centuries - creation and expansion of Polish noble consciousness

The 18th to 19th century - Polish psyche flourished on the misfortunes of partitions and struggles for independency (community of people with the same history, culture, language, traditions)

The 20th century - regained independency and modern identity

So, the Polish nation has developed since the 10th century, contrary to what the above note communicates.

AS has no thought what he's writing about. In fact, we have been faced with the creation of a state. The fact that it was not national proves neighborhood breakdown. The last large King of the First Sands Boleslaw Krzywousty he divided his estates among his sons, what we now call a two-century territory breakdown, while in the position of lasting failure of Silesia (actually until 1945).

He just made the curves while he was inactive alive. inheritance. In the 12th century, the notion of a nation did not exist.

Only Łokietek in 1320 began the process of integrating Poland into 1 organism. But not as a "national state," but as a monarchy under the authority of 1 king.

The long way has not only been between us, but besides between Europe and today's concept.

AS completely ignores my claim about the modern concept of the Nation.

And he writes about the creation and expansion of Polish noble consciousness.

But this “awareness” afraid 8-10% of the full population of then Poland! Outside its margin, there were peasants and townspeople.

However, since the 19th century, all social classes have been accepted as the Nation.

In addition, the concept of "nation" is not only appropriate for Poland and Poles. It should be recalled that the rule of self-determination of nations was at the heart of political order after planet War I!

Agnisia, on the another hand, is comic erstwhile she writes:

You may personally consider Agnieszka Nogel the eventual authority. But don't forget another views:

Roman Dmowski – a community of blood and culture

Joseph Tischner – a nation as a community of values

Ernest Renan – a nation as a community of memory and will

And that's pure neobolshevik bullshit. The charge is important, not the facts.

Apparently AS speaking to others and this about the sovietization and this about the subjection of German propaganda itself is simply a typical example of homo sovieticus.

Prof. Nogel writes about this, how specified concepts as those of Fr Tischner, Dmowski or Renan developed.

And that's all you gotta understand. I think even a individual with an IQ greater by 2 points than the intelligence of an automatic washing device should understand. 😉

And finally, a tiny quote by prof. Nogel, who according to the American housewife has different views than Renan:

In a speech entitled What is simply a nation? Ernst Renan pointed to the political process of the emergence of nations. In this interpretation, as a consequence of historical conquests, the imposition of language and dominant culture, modern national communities developed. Renan stressed the function played by monarchs in this process. The king of France united the lands, imposed their language, administration, and uniform law, aligning and harmonising their subjects. And although the revolution deprived him of power, it besides revealed the existence of the monarchy-shaped collective existence, a nation – a unified and self-conscious group. specified a view has been determined by the political concept of the nation.

I don't anticipate you to worshipper of Ukrainian murderers of Poles She was going to apologize for her blankets.

Honestly, it's a lotto to me. AS has not been a valued author of Russian propaganda portal since today, so her attacks on Polish bloggers do not surprise anyone. It's specified a putiniada.

But general discipline is the same for everyone.

Before you start criticizing anything, read the text.

Otherwise, you're making fun of yourselves.

Like AS.

28.09 2025