Swach says, "I'm vraje."

maciejsynak.blogspot.com 7 months ago



Swanba – otherwise a wedding, an old Polish, Slavic form of wedding, a ceremonial ceremony of matrimony consisting in swearing an oath to the gods in the presence of a feeding or matchmaker.

Today, a sniveling can be identified with a swagger, or matchmaking.

In the erstwhile Slavic matrimony was a voluntary agreement, confirmed by common gifts of equal value binding the household of spouses with constant relationship – inactive in noble Poland the dowry was to be equal to the village – it was said that the matrimony belonged to families.

In the early days of Christianity in Slavic lands, there were times erstwhile incorrect and biased It has been reported that matrimony with Slavs could be concluded by rape, abduction or purchase. [in the village tradition of "hijacking the bride" alive until present - MS] While the acquisition was a secondary phenomenon resulting from the court agreement and the exchange of gifts alternatively than the first one, the abduction of a female for the matrimony was usually apparent, with the agreement of the young – erstwhile a simple road (the court agreement) failed or was besides tedious (usually erstwhile there was a deficiency of funds for the wedding equipment).

The staged eunuch opposed commonly accepted customs (especially for a female erstwhile her parents' acceptance for the union was not possible later), but did not have negative consequences, as in the case of actual abduction. For the actual abduction was due to retaliation – the household of the seduced individual returned the assault and murder, and later the law punished with death. Rape abduction was as uncommon as murder.

An crucial function in the sniveling was the form that enabled it, or matchmaker – a individual of serious and universal recognition. Among the peasants inactive in the 14th and 16th centuries, the matchmaker himself included marriages, and the Church punished with excommunication a layman who would dare to join matrimony without a priest.











Swiss meaning: wedding


Examples: Serbian swish in Błoty → Slavic weddings in Błoty (title of Mato Kósyk track)


etymology:The press.* Oh, my God *svatьba “wedding, feasting, feasting”Cf.st.pol.force ‘Feast, feast’, Bye.svatba ‘wedding’, It's a charm.svadba ‘wedding’

sources:
Heinz Schuster-Šewc, Historisch-etymologisches Wörterbuch der ober- und niedersorbischen Sprache, People's Domovina levy, Budziszyn 1980–1989.





Swat – a individual who is simply a middleman in marriage. The word comes from an old Polish word snakeI mean, the wedding. Depending on the region of Poland besides referred to as cuttlefish, swach, paradise, paradise, paradise, paradise, paradise, raven, raven, paradise, origin or texture.

Its primary function was to present the candidate or candidate for matrimony in the best possible light, and the matchmaker besides encouraged the parents to bestow on the bride a crucial sage.




etymology:


matchmaker, au Yours, p. his, matchmaking, collective; match; bold swach, swach; Swashek; from the verb: snake, ‘wedding’, miswritten force (like sample), and hence influence‘contribute’ (16th century), Sudden next door Swadebny, ‘wedding’ (about songs and t. d.). The matrimony was connected,ContentHouses.



custom - customized (connect) - MS



♪ Baby, baby, baby ♪
– word created as a translation of the Latin expression paranymphus.

This is simply a function related to marriage, which has been suppressed by the word matchmaker. However, in sources originating from the period of early Poland, there is more frequently a brawl.

The origin of both words is different, so it is possible to conclude about their various originally meanings, which the consciousness faded around the 16th century. The word is derived from the words “nine to be oppressed” where it means to be married. In Poles, as in all Slavs, there is simply a word for a wedding as “swats”, which in turn was the basis for creating the word matchmaker.



Bernard Sychta - Kashubian Vocabulary Volumes 5 and 6



swach - matchmaker







Vreje - vreje







paradise - paradise - paradise







Similarly, in Sychty's cat dictionary:

paradise - matchmaking
paradise - matchmaker
Paradise, Paradise, Paradise - Matches




other wiki forews
automatic translation

Svayaṃvara - fragments



Svayaṃvara (Sanskrit: स्वयंवर dł. 'self-bore') is simply a matrimony tradition in ancient Indian society in which the bride, usually of caste Kṣatriya (warlords), elects her husband from a group of assembled suitors either by his own choice, or by a public competition between her suitors. This practice occurs mainly in the 2 main Sanskrit epos, Mahābhārata and Rāmāyaṇa [dated - 400 and 700 years before Christ - tradition is so at least 2,700 years old - MS], although its distribution and presentation vary greatly between them.


The beginnings of Svayaṃvara date back to the Vedic period and fewer researchers propose that it emerged from the matrimony tradition of Gāndharva, moving distant from more ritualistic and arranged forms of marriage, and developed as a communicative tool in eposa to emphasize heroism and valor of heroes, adapting to the ethos of Ksatriya's rivalry and combat performance. Although it is closely related to epos, Svayaṃvara is not mentioned as a form of matrimony in Dharmasastra, a collection of Sanskrit texts on law and conduct. For this reason, Svayaṃvara is sometimes considered the ninth form of Hindu marriage.


Name

The word Svayaṃvara derives from a Sanskrit, where it consists of 2 parts: "svayam" (स्वयम्) meaning "self" and "vara" (वर) meaning "choice" or "desire". Therefore, this word virtually translates as "a self-choice".

paradise - matchmaking
custom

The swach says:
"I am vraje" --- "I am paradise"?

connection in paradise (in matchmaking) ? tip changed, lost - MS



The word "Svaya It is crucial to note that in any crucial cases, erstwhile the bride chooses her husband independently, without formal ceremony, the word "Svayaṃvara" is not used—as in the case of Sāvitri choosing Satyavan. This word appears 52 times in Mahabharat and only 6 times in Rāmāyan.

This word is utilized primarily in Ādiparvan Mahābhārata and Araṇyakāṇḍ Rāmāyaṇa, which experienced crucial expansion in the later epic phase.

Thus, according to John L. Brockington, "this word seems to belong not so much to the earliest, heroic phase of the improvement of the epics, but to the next, more aesthetically, or even romanticly motivated phase, and in fact became much little common in the next phase (phases of the parvans of Sānti and Anusāsan of Mahābhārata and Bāla and Uttara kāṇḍas Rāmāyaē), with his more moral and spiritual accent"



Beginnings and Development

The origin of Svayaṃvar is somewhat ambiguous, and scholars follow this practice until the early Vedic period (c. 1500–1100 BC). Historian Hanns-Peter Schmidt suggests that his origins may lie in ancient Indian customs with counterparts in the Indo-European tradition, as seen in Zratusztrian Iran.

In support of this thesis, linguist Stephanie W. Jamison notes a number of indirect references to the Swajaṃwara in Rigweda, the oldest Hindu writing, and suggests that this customized may have roots in the Indo-European tradition due to a similarity to the stories of Penelope and her many suitors in the Greek poem Odyssey.

[...]



Many scholars, though they accept its existence in the Weds, claims that the actual historical records of the customs of Swabianara are uncommon and claim that in our early era they functioned more as a literary catch in epos than as a commonly practiced tradition.

In the epic stories of Mahabharata and Ramayana (c. 500 BC–500 AD) Svayaṃvara is portrayed as a knightly, glorious and festive ceremony which, according to the indologist Edward W. Hopkins, is not an evolution of the earlier concept of self-objection granted to women, but alternatively a distinct form that developed during the epic period of Hinduism. possibly of Indo-European roots.

Hopkins besides believes that svayaṃvara may have denied the earlier practice of xatriya kidnapping the bride, a customized that may have taken place with or without the bride. [raja - Rajic - Rajbe - Rajber - MS]




Kshatrija (Sanskrit: क्षत्रिय, romanized: Kṣatriya) (from Sanskrit kṣatra, "power, power"; besides called Rajanya) is 1 of 4 faiths (social order) of Hindu society and is associated with a militant aristocracy.

[...]

Although Puruza Sukta uses the word paradisea alternatively than Kshatriya, it is believed to be the first case in preserved Vedic texts, in which 4 social classes are first mentioned.

Use of deadline Rajanya probably indicates that the "bloods of Radjan" (i.e. relatives of the ruler) emerged then as a separate social group, so that at the end of the Vedic period the word paradise was replaced by kshatry; where radjanya emphasizes the relation with the councilan, and kshatriya means power over a peculiar domain. The word rajanya, unlike the word kszatrija, fundamentally meant position within the line.


Kshatrija also called Rajanya ??? - MS



According to Hartmut Scharfe, if the epos svayaṃvara reflects the authentic tradition among the xatris, it could service as a mechanics to mitigate the political pressures associated with matrimony alliances. In the social class where marriages were commonly arranged to safe political alliances, frequently with limited consideration of bride's preferences, svajanvara allowed a female a certain degree of autonomy in her choice of husband. Alternatively, she could submit to the consequence of a skill-based rivalry, which relieved her father of the work for choosing a suitor, thus avoiding possible conflicts with powerful neighboring rulers.

In the epics, the large Svayaṃvars function as crucial communicative tools leading to the matrimony of respective major heroines. Brockington claims that the first svayṃvars in these epos focus on valor, Like svayaṃvara Draupadi, which was written in the early epic phase of Mahabharata, where Arjuna, dressed as a brahmin, gains her hand through an extraordinary show of archery skills.


[...]


Svayaṃvara Draupadi is the most celebrated example in Mahabharata. Text references in Mahabharat supply a detailed description of this event. Ādiparvan describes preparations for Svayaṃvara, a gathering of suitors and details of the competition (Mbh. 1.174-185). Draupadi herself refers to this event in later parts of the epic, pointing to its permanent importance in her life and wider past (Mbh. 2.62.4a).

Draupadi is the daughter of King Drupada of Pankali. The Drupada King arranges Svayanvara to find the right husband for his daughter. He holds a rigorous competition to choice Draupadi's future husband.

The main challenge is simply a massive arch that should be drawn and utilized to shoot the arrow into a rotating target, looking at its reflection in the water below – a task requiring extraordinary strength, precision and focus.

The event attracts princes and warriors from all over the country, including the Kauravs, Karna and Pandavs (who are in disguise). Among Karn players, known for his unparalleled archery skills, he takes on a challenge. However, Draupadi, who was granted a certain choice on this issue, rejects Karna, citing his low birth as a sūta (the chariot carriage driver), although this scene is not mostly consistent in different versions of the text. There is different information on the participation of the Criminal; Many versions of this text describe that he failed to draw a bow on "the width of the hair".

Arjuna, dressed as a brahmin (a cast of priests), takes the challenge. Despite his incognito appearance, Arjuna's innate skills and divine favour let him to execute this task with ease. He manages to pull a bow and hit the target, capturing Draupadi's hand in marriage.

The triumph of Arjuna, a Ksatriya warrior dressed as a brahmin, provokes outrage among another suitors, especially among the Kauravas and Karna. After returning to their parent Kunti of Draupadi, Arjun and his brothers inadvertently put her in a situation where she becomes the joint wife of all 5 Pandavs. This remarkable matrimony arrangement, although rooted in misunderstanding, is sanctioned by divine and biblical reasoning contained in the epic. Draupadi's matrimony to the Pandavas is not only an integral part of the storyline but besides symbolizes unity and shared work among the brothers.


[...]




Svayaṃvara Sita is simply a critical event in Rāmāyaṇa, told in Ayodhyākāṇḍa text. Organized by King Janaka of Mithila, Svayaṃvara aimed to find the right husband for Sita, the daughter of Janaka, who was known for her beauty, virtue and divine origin.

The challenge faced by suitors was to pull and break a colossal bow, A pin that erstwhile belonged to Mr. Shiva. This arch was so powerful that no of the assembled princes and warriors from different kingdoms could even lift it up, let alone cut and break.

The arrival of Rama, Prince of Ajodhji, to Swayana-wara was a turning point in this event.

In the company of his brother Laksmana and the sage Visvamitra, Rama spoke forward in favour of Visvamitra. To the amazement of all present, Rama effortlessly raised the bow, pulled it up and broke it in half, thus gaining Sitā's hand in marriage.

This act was not only a demonstration of Rama's physical strength, but besides a clear indication of his divine grace and destiny as a protector of the dharma. After Rama's success, King Janaka was overjoyed and immediately offered Sītā Ramie. However, Rama, according to the cultural standards of that time, requested approval from his father, King Dasarath of Ayodhya, before accepting Sītā as his wife. erstwhile Dasaratha agreed, the matrimony was arranged with a large ceremony, marking the union of the 2 most respected figures in the Hindu tradition.





paradise - paradise - paradise









It seems that Polish matchmakers and Hindu Svayaṃvara - is the same tradition which is over 2,700 years old.

And actually more, I think, about 6,000 years.







-------


Odyssey - fragments


[...]

Odysseus' identity is discovered by the housekeeper Eurycleia erstwhile she recognizes an old scar erstwhile she washes his feet. Eurycleia tries to tell Penelope about the actual identity of the beggar, but Athena makes certain Penelope can't hear her. Odysseus swears the Euryclei keep a secret.


Killing suitors (Books 21–24)Ulysses and Telemachs kill suitors Penelope, Thomas Degeorge (1812)

The next day, after Athena's suggestion, Penelope manipulates suitors into competing for her hand in an archery competition utilizing the bow of Odysseus. A man who could pull a bow and shoot an arrow through a twelve heads of axe would win.






Odysseus takes part in the competition and only he is strong adequate to pull a bow and shoot an arrow through a twelve heads of axe, making him a winner. He then drops his rags and kills Antinous with his next arrow. paradise - paradise - paradise - paradise ---- Paradise, Paradise, Paradise - MatchesOdysseus kills the remaining suitors, first utilizing the remainder of the shot, then, along with Telemach, Eumajos and shepherd Philoectius, swords and spears.

When the conflict is won, Telemach besides hangs 12 of their maids, which Eurycleia identifies as guilty of cheating on Penelope or having sex with suitors. Odysseus identifies with Penelope. She is indecisive, but recognizes him erstwhile she mentions that he made them a bed of olive tree, which is inactive rooted in the ground. She embraces him and sleeps together.






Assault on Paradise ended with the slaughter of men.








Most Mahabharats was most likely compiled between

3rd century B.C.E. and 3rd century B.C.,

The oldest preserved parts are small older than about 400 B.C.E.


Ramayana - technological estimates of the earliest phase of the text's creation include the period from the seventh to 5th centuries B.C.E. ,





Read Entire Article