Stanisław Michalkiewicz: We Mutate
Recently in Warsaw, a group of citizens protested against the alleged “Bieruta's decree”, i.e. – “Decree on land ownership and usage in the area of Warsaw”, issued by the National Council on 26 October 1945, on the sixth anniversary of Adolf Hitler's establishment of the General Government. Not without a code do I mention this anniversary, due to the fact that while Adolf Hitler's decision to make the General Government was revolutionary, likewise revolutionary was mentioned in the decree.
On the basis of it, all the land in the area of the capital city of Warsaw, was owned by the municipality. It is worth noting that the decree did not concern buildings. These may inactive have been owned by afraid owners – but the land under buildings – no longer. It was 1 of the communist inventions in the form of “perpetual use” – due to the fact that it was essential to make any appearance of legality for the owner of the building, who has since stood on another's ground. Thus, the owner of the building became a “everlasting user” of the urban land – and this “everlasting use” had to be renewed all 99 years.
This has been the case so far, due to the fact that erstwhile the second communist invention in the form of “household communities” in the 1950s and especially the 1960s and later developed, they erected buildings on urban grounds, being “everlasting users”. Since according to the communist superstition, “cooperative property” was considered to be a “higher” form of property than private property, cooperatives – although they benefited from “own contributions” from “cooperatives” – were owners of buildings and apartments.
The tenants – and only in the case of alleged “ownership” apartments – were granted the alleged “cooperative right to the premises”. It was another communist invention intended to be a substitute for property rights. “The right to a place” was – like any another rights on another’s thing – a tradable right, that is – it could be sold. And specified a state, with all these communist inventions, has survived to this day and will last God knows how much.
Because not only the “Decree of Bieruta” survived the celebrated systemic transformation, but 30 years later, already in “free Poland” The Sejm issued a bill according to which Bierut's decree was approved. If it has been 30 years since the administrative decision to take over the property, it will no longer be possible to initiate a procedure for contesting it and regaining the lost property. This besides applies to cases where the decision was issued “with a gross violation of the law”, or even without a legal basis at all.
Like all revolutionary acts, the “Bieruta decree” is laconic; it counts all 12 articles. It is worth noting that it is 10 articles shorter than the 1944 Agricultural improvement Decree, but the agricultural improvement decree afraid the full country, while the “Bieruta decree” – only the Warsaw land. But already the Act of 3 January 1946 on the taking over of the state of the basic sectors of the national economy only counts 11 articles.
The Act introduced exceptions, e.g. in Article 3(4), allowed the anticipation that companies confiscated by b. occupying authorities — that is, the authorities of the General Government — could not be transferred to the ownership of the State unless they had previously been state-owned, or if the owner had abandoned the company after 1 September 1939 under threat. I wonder if this bill, like the aforementioned regulations, will be someway modified in the case of the transformation of the III Republic to the General Government, or will stay the foundation of the legal strategy besides in the conditions of the 4th Reich.
It is worth noting that the 3rd Reich was a socialist state and – as it is shown from the diary of Albnert Speer, who had to know something about the economy there – socialist changes took place there despite the ongoing war, and even utilizing it as a pretext. For example, property law was formally preserved, but under the pretext of war it was washed out of all content, so the Soviets did not have any peculiar problems to transform their business region into a model socialist state – the German Democratic Republic.
It is simply a kind of paradox that the foundations of the 3rd Republic legal strategy are communist decrees or laws. It's kind of like the basis of the legal strategy of the national Republic of Germany is, for example, the Nuremberg laws, or something like that. That is why prof. Bogusław Wolniewicz was right erstwhile he said that communism in Poland did not "fall" but "mutated".
How he would have fallen, since due to Kukuńek and known for his “handmaiden stand” Tadeusz Mazowiecki, the first president of “free Poland” became the leader of these “fallen” communists, General Wojciech Jaruzelski, and after a brief episode with Kukuńek, whose presidency was a mockery of the Polish nation by General Kiszczak (you do not want Jaruzelski, you will have Kukuńek), Aleksander Kwaśniewski, who was born in the cap of the commune.
So not only did he fail, but he left so many spores that his reactivation would not be a problem – evidently no longer according to the Bolshevik strategy, but according to the modern one, which – just to look – the US exports to the full world.
In what direction will this fresh communism mutate? We do not know this, but in whatever way it does not mutate, the goals of the communist revolution stay unchanged. The first goal is to grow a russian man. specified Soviets are already bred in our country. How do we identify a russian man; how is he different from a average man? After the russian man renounced his free will, that is, what the Christian religion sees as God's likeness in man.
When we see how herd behaviour is becoming more dominant in our social life, the presence of Soviets is not in doubt. But there is simply a problem with russian people. They cannot live in a average planet where independent choices must be made. Therefore, the second goal of the communist revolution is to make an artificial environment for russian people to live in. This environment is simply a totalitarian state – and will it be called the PRL or the General Government – is it so important?
We besides recommend: Magna Polonia on mark Moscow!
