Stanisław Michalkiewicz: Theology and Holocaust Politics
Adolf Hitler, overachiever, in hell she rubs her hands, loudly screams: ha! That's great! specified a travesty of the poem by Louis Jerzy Kern could be commented on the scandal that started during the celebration of the next anniversary of the liberation of the Auschwitz camp, which is now celebrated around the planet – well, not all around the world, but in any case – in the planet – as Holocaust Memorial Day. On this occasion, even His Holiness Leon XIV made a declaration of condemnation of “anti-Semitism”.
What this could mean, specifically, that we do not know exactly, but given the evangelical hint that what you will bind (or dissolve) on earth will be bound (or dissolved in Heaven), it may mean that Heaven, respecting this symmetry, besides anti-Semitism will condemn—and this may mean that he will now be treated as a severe sin that will not be forgiven in this planet or in that world.
Perhaps there would be nothing incorrect with it if it were not for the fact that what is anti-Semitism and what is not is not decided by either His Holiness or anyone else—only the fresh York-based Anti-Defamation League, possibly the authorities of priceless Israel. For example, they have late considered the criticism of Israel's priceless conduct towards the Palestinians in the Gaza Strip to be “anti-Semitism”. Does the Holy See feel that way? I think so, due to the fact that – as the authoritative Vatican paper from the pontificate of John Paul II preached – “in the past” there were “inappropriate” interpretations of the Gospel.
This was, of course, about specified interpretations that the Jews did not like – due to the fact that behind the pontificate of John Paul we had to deal with something like an apogee of licking the Jews by the highest circles of the Catholic Church. But since “in the past” there have been “inadequate” interpretations, can we be certain that today’s interpretations are surely right, and do not contain lewd acts of disgusting heaven?
Such certainty will never again be restored—and in the case of anti-Semitism—what is it and what is not—the last word must belong to the Anti-Defamation League, or to Israel—and not only to the Holy See, but besides to Heaven. It seems that theology is promising a real revolution, the consequences of which are hard to foretell today, as it is hard to foretell the consequences of a contract in Metz, concluded between a advanced KGB officer acting as a typical of the Orthodox Church, and Eugenius Cardinal Tisserant, who represented the Catholic Church.
Under this agreement Pope John XXIII He pledged that the Second Vatican Council would not condemn communism. And since then, communism has no longer been condemned, although as far as the number of victims is concerned, there is no comparison with national socialism, to which these victims can be attributed far less. So why are we celebrating Holocaust Memorial Day, and we do not celebrate any day of remembrance of the victims of the Polish NKVD Operation or the Victims of Collectiveization in the USSR, who were at least twice as many as Jews murdered in the Holocaust?
The rude explanation that comes to my head is that Hitler lost the war while Stalin won it. However, that would indicate that Adolf Hitler was right, at least erstwhile he said the winner was not judged. And if he was right about that, why should we say no to him in advance?
However, let us return to the brawl that began during the celebration of another anniversary of the liberation of the temporarily inactive Auschwitz camp. As bitterly stated by Mr Kolarski of the President's Chancellery, president Nawrocki nor was he personally welcomed by the Camp Commandant, nor did he let him to talk during the ceremony and made his message only later.
The commandant in a peculiar message claims that everything was in the best order, due to the fact that it welcomed various environments, among them – the environment “representatives of state authorities”, so no 1 was excluded. All of this, possibly – but if specified a ceremony were attended by Mr Rafał Trzaskowski, as president of the Republic, wouldn't he have been welcomed by the Commandantura with bread and salt, and who knows if the organized ad hoc camp orchestra would not have played for him to welcome “Tang Mong” (“Tango Mong, tango my dreams and dreams, let me hear 1 last time...”)?
But as well as Mr Rafał Trzaskowski would should be satisfied with only an “environmental” welcome – due to the fact that it cannot be excluded that the present Commandment of the Temporary Inactive Camp in Oświęcim, considers this object extraterritorial. This impression could have been taken earlier, erstwhile the Commandant did not agree to usage the Polish flags, and not long ago, erstwhile Grzegorz Braun was not allowed into the camp due to the fact that he wanted to criticize the draft resolution of the Council of Ministers on combating anti-Semitism and supporting judaic life in our unfortunate country.
It is clear that in the area of the temporarily inactive camp, his commandantature feels entitled to establish its own rights, and if so, can it be doubtful that it does not consider the area occupied by the camp to be part of the state territory of the Republic of Poland, but as an extraterritorial area?
It is worth recalling, then, that a akin postulate was made by the representation of judaic parliamentarians during the discussion of the constitution, alleged “March”. Well, judaic parliamentarians demanded that the compact aggregates of judaic population in towns and cities should have extraterritorial status. It did not pass; the constitution recognized Poland as a unitary state, but for Silesia, which within the limits of the Republic had autonomy and its own Sejm.
It was only during the business that Germany implemented this post – but of course in their own way, that is, spending the judaic population to the ghettos, which, what is worth noting, were not subject to local, Polish municipal authorities, but straight to German administration.
It is possible that these experiences will be utilized in the close future, when, following the amendments to the Lisbon Treaty already recommended by the European Parliament, building IV The Reich will begin to gain the Stachanist pace, and Poland will be transformed into a kind of German colony at a akin rate, in the image of the General Government.
Since irresponsible elements would surely effort to torpedo the German reconstruction work in the General Governorate, it would most likely be essential to restart the temporarily inactive camps, specified as the 1 in Oświęcim – of course after rebuilding the infrastructure and recruiting the crew, e.g. from among the citizens of Ukraine who are on the Polish territory, who most likely do not request to be motivated for this purpose. But under these circumstances, would it be essential to consider the condition of extraterritoriality of the camp? I'm not certain even citizen Tusk Donald would be convinced of that.
We besides recommend: Globalists endanger the planet with a fresh Nipah pandemic
